T P Hansen1, J Cain1, O Thomas2, A Jackson3. 1. From the Centre for Imaging Sciences (T.P.H., J.C., A.J.), Wolfson Molecular Imaging Centre, University of Manchester, Greater Manchester, UK. 2. Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust (O.T.), Salford, UK. 3. From the Centre for Imaging Sciences (T.P.H., J.C., A.J.), Wolfson Molecular Imaging Centre, University of Manchester, Greater Manchester, UK Alan.Jackson@Manchester.ac.uk.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Dilated perivascular spaces have been shown to be a specific biomarker of cerebral small-vessel disease in young patients with dementia. Our aim was to examine the discriminative power of dilated cerebral perivascular spaces as biomarkers of small-vessel disease in a very elderly population of patients with dementia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied healthy volunteers (n = 65; mean age, 78 ± 5.6 years) and subjects with vascular dementia (n = 39; mean age, 76.9 ± 7.7 years) and Alzheimer disease (n = 47; mean age, 74.1 ± 8.5 years). We compared white matter hyperintensity and 2 semiquantitative perivascular space scoring systems (perivascular space-1 and perivascular space-2). Intra- and interobserver agreement was assessed by using a weighted Cohen κ statistic. Multinomial regression modeling was used to assess the discriminative power of imaging features to distinguish clinical groups. RESULTS: White matter hyperintensity scores were higher in vascular dementia than in Alzheimer disease (P < .05) or healthy volunteers (P < .01). The perivascular space-1 score was higher in vascular dementia and Alzheimer disease than in healthy volunteers (P < .01). The perivascular space-2 score in the centrum semiovale showed no intergroup differences. However, perivascular space-2 in the basal ganglia was higher in vascular dementia than in Alzheimer disease (P < .05) or healthy volunteers (P < .001) and higher in Alzheimer disease than in healthy volunteers (P < .001). Modeling of dementia versus healthy volunteers, Alzheimer disease versus healthy volunteers, and vascular dementia against Alzheimer disease demonstrated perivascular space-2basal ganglia as the only imaging parameter with independent significant discriminative power (P < .01, P < .01, and P < .05) with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.855, 0.774, and 0.71, respectively. Modeling of vascular dementia versus healthy volunteers showed that perivascular space-2basal ganglia (P < .01) and the modified Scheltens score (P < .05) contributed significant, independent discriminatory power, accounting for 34% and 13% of the variance in the model respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Dilated perivascular spaces remain a valuable biomarker of small-vessel disease in an elderly population.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Dilated perivascular spaces have been shown to be a specific biomarker of cerebral small-vessel disease in young patients with dementia. Our aim was to examine the discriminative power of dilated cerebral perivascular spaces as biomarkers of small-vessel disease in a very elderly population of patients with dementia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied healthy volunteers (n = 65; mean age, 78 ± 5.6 years) and subjects with vascular dementia (n = 39; mean age, 76.9 ± 7.7 years) and Alzheimer disease (n = 47; mean age, 74.1 ± 8.5 years). We compared white matter hyperintensity and 2 semiquantitative perivascular space scoring systems (perivascular space-1 and perivascular space-2). Intra- and interobserver agreement was assessed by using a weighted Cohen κ statistic. Multinomial regression modeling was used to assess the discriminative power of imaging features to distinguish clinical groups. RESULTS: White matter hyperintensity scores were higher in vascular dementia than in Alzheimer disease (P < .05) or healthy volunteers (P < .01). The perivascular space-1 score was higher in vascular dementia and Alzheimer disease than in healthy volunteers (P < .01). The perivascular space-2 score in the centrum semiovale showed no intergroup differences. However, perivascular space-2 in the basal ganglia was higher in vascular dementia than in Alzheimer disease (P < .05) or healthy volunteers (P < .001) and higher in Alzheimer disease than in healthy volunteers (P < .001). Modeling of dementia versus healthy volunteers, Alzheimer disease versus healthy volunteers, and vascular dementia against Alzheimer disease demonstrated perivascular space-2basal ganglia as the only imaging parameter with independent significant discriminative power (P < .01, P < .01, and P < .05) with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.855, 0.774, and 0.71, respectively. Modeling of vascular dementia versus healthy volunteers showed that perivascular space-2basal ganglia (P < .01) and the modified Scheltens score (P < .05) contributed significant, independent discriminatory power, accounting for 34% and 13% of the variance in the model respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Dilated perivascular spaces remain a valuable biomarker of small-vessel disease in an elderly population.
Authors: T Patankar; E Widjaja; H Chant; C McCollum; R Baldwin; S Jeffries; C Sutcliffe; A Burns; A Jackson Journal: Eur J Neurol Date: 2006-01 Impact factor: 6.089
Authors: G C Román; T K Tatemichi; T Erkinjuntti; J L Cummings; J C Masdeu; J H Garcia; L Amaducci; J M Orgogozo; A Brun; A Hofman Journal: Neurology Date: 1993-02 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Margaret M Esiri; Catharine Joachim; Carolyn Sloan; Sharon Christie; Grzegorz Agacinski; Leslie R Bridges; Gordon K Wilcock; A David Smith Journal: Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord Date: 2014 Jan-Mar Impact factor: 2.703
Authors: Joanna M Wardlaw; Eric E Smith; Geert J Biessels; Charlotte Cordonnier; Franz Fazekas; Richard Frayne; Richard I Lindley; John T O'Brien; Frederik Barkhof; Oscar R Benavente; Sandra E Black; Carol Brayne; Monique Breteler; Hugues Chabriat; Charles Decarli; Frank-Erik de Leeuw; Fergus Doubal; Marco Duering; Nick C Fox; Steven Greenberg; Vladimir Hachinski; Ingo Kilimann; Vincent Mok; Robert van Oostenbrugge; Leonardo Pantoni; Oliver Speck; Blossom C M Stephan; Stefan Teipel; Anand Viswanathan; David Werring; Christopher Chen; Colin Smith; Mark van Buchem; Bo Norrving; Philip B Gorelick; Martin Dichgans Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2013-08 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Giuseppe Barisano; Meng Law; Rachel M Custer; Arthur W Toga; Farshid Sepehrband Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am Date: 2020-11-02 Impact factor: 1.376
Authors: Rosalind Brown; Helene Benveniste; Sandra E Black; Serge Charpak; Martin Dichgans; Anne Joutel; Maiken Nedergaard; Kenneth J Smith; Berislav V Zlokovic; Joanna M Wardlaw Journal: Cardiovasc Res Date: 2018-09-01 Impact factor: 10.787
Authors: Karl Mercieca; John Cain; Thomas Hansen; Laura Steeples; Amy Watkins; Fiona Spencer; Alan Jackson Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2016-02-29 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Robert Perneczky; Oren Tene; Johannes Attems; Panteleimon Giannakopoulos; M Arfan Ikram; Antonio Federico; Marie Sarazin; Lefkos T Middleton Journal: BMC Med Date: 2016-11-03 Impact factor: 8.775
Authors: Sara Shams; Juha Martola; Andreas Charidimou; Mykol Larvie; Tobias Granberg; Mana Shams; Maria Kristoffersen-Wiberg; Lars-Olof Wahlund Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2017-09-22 Impact factor: 5.501