Background The long-term post acute pulmonary sequelae of COVID-19 remain unknown. Purpose To evaluate lung injury in patients affected by COVID-19 pneumonia at six-month follow-up compared to baseline chest CT. Methods From March 19th,2020 to May 24th,2020, patients with moderate to severe COVID-19 pneumonia and baseline Chest CT were prospectively enrolled at six-months follow-up. CT qualitative findings, semi-quantitative Lungs Severity Score (LSS) and well-aerated lung quantitative Chest CT (QCCT) were analyzed. Baseline LSS and QCCT performances in predicting fibrotic-like changes (reticular pattern and/or honeycombing) at six-month follow-up Chest CT were tested with receiver operating characteristic curves. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis were used to test clinical and radiological features predictive of fibrotic-like changes. The multivariable analysis was performed with clinical parameters alone (clinical model), radiological parameters alone (radiological model) and the combination of clinical and radiological parameters (combined model). Results One-hundred-eighteen patients, with both baseline and six-month follow-up Chest CT, were included in the study (62 female, mean age 65±12 years). At follow-up Chest CT, 85/118 (72%) patients showed fibrotic-like changes and 49/118 (42%) showed GGOs. Baseline LSS (>14), QCCT (≤3.75L and ≤80%) showed an excellent performance in predicting fibrotic-like changes at Chest CT follow-up. In the multivariable analysis, AUC was .89 (95%CI .77-.96) for the clinical model, .81 (95%CI .68-.9) for the radiological model and .92 (95%CI .81-.98)for the combined model. Conclusion At six-month follow-up Chest CT, 72% of patients showed late sequelae, in particular fibrotic-like changes. Baseline LSS and QCCT of well-aerated lung showed an excellent performance in predicting fibrotic-like changes at six-month Chest CT (AUC>.88). Male sex, cough, lymphocytosis and QCCT well-aerated lung were significant predictors of fibrotic-like changes at six-month with an inverse correlation (AUC .92). See also the editorial by Wells and Devaraj.
Background The long-term post acute pulmonary sequelae of COVID-19 remain unknown. Purpose To evaluate lung injury in patients affected by COVID-19 pneumonia at six-month follow-up compared to baseline chest CT. Methods From March 19th,2020 to May 24th,2020, patients with moderate to severe COVID-19 pneumonia and baseline Chest CT were prospectively enrolled at six-months follow-up. CT qualitative findings, semi-quantitative Lungs Severity Score (LSS) and well-aerated lung quantitative Chest CT (QCCT) were analyzed. Baseline LSS and QCCT performances in predicting fibrotic-like changes (reticular pattern and/or honeycombing) at six-month follow-up Chest CT were tested with receiver operating characteristic curves. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis were used to test clinical and radiological features predictive of fibrotic-like changes. The multivariable analysis was performed with clinical parameters alone (clinical model), radiological parameters alone (radiological model) and the combination of clinical and radiological parameters (combined model). Results One-hundred-eighteen patients, with both baseline and six-month follow-up Chest CT, were included in the study (62 female, mean age 65±12 years). At follow-up Chest CT, 85/118 (72%) patients showed fibrotic-like changes and 49/118 (42%) showed GGOs. Baseline LSS (>14), QCCT (≤3.75L and ≤80%) showed an excellent performance in predicting fibrotic-like changes at Chest CT follow-up. In the multivariable analysis, AUC was .89 (95%CI .77-.96) for the clinical model, .81 (95%CI .68-.9) for the radiological model and .92 (95%CI .81-.98)for the combined model. Conclusion At six-month follow-up Chest CT, 72% of patients showed late sequelae, in particular fibrotic-like changes. Baseline LSS and QCCT of well-aerated lung showed an excellent performance in predicting fibrotic-like changes at six-month Chest CT (AUC>.88). Male sex, cough, lymphocytosis and QCCT well-aerated lung were significant predictors of fibrotic-like changes at six-month with an inverse correlation (AUC .92). See also the editorial by Wells and Devaraj.
At 6-month follow-up chest CT, COVID-19 postacute sequelae were detected in
72% of patients: fibrotic-like changes were the most common residual
findings (72%), followed by ground-glass opacities (42%).Baseline Lung Severity Score (>14) showed an optimal performance
in predicting fibrotic-like changes at follow-up (AUC: .91; sensitivity:
88%; specificity: 80%).Multivariable analysis showed that male sex, cough, lymphocytosis and
Quantitative Chest Computed Tomography well-aerated lung volume were
significant predictors of fibrotic-like changes at six-month follow-up
with an inverse correlation (AUC: .92; sensitivity: 100%;
specificity: 73%).
Introduction
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is caused by a novel coronavirus, known as severe
acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and has been declared a
pandemic by the World Health Organization (WHO) on March 11, 2020 (1).Chest CT qualitative findings of COVID-2019 pneumonia have been deeply investigated
in literature (2), as well as quantitative
Chest CT (QCCT) methods (3–5) and semiquantitative lung severity scores
(LSS) (6, 7). Typical Chest CT findings of COVID-19 pneumonia include bilateral
and multilobe ground glass opacities (GGOs) with posterior and peripheral
distribution associated with consolidations, interlobular septal thickening and
subsegmental pulmonary vessels enlargement (> 3 mm) (8).The short- and mid-term Chest CT outcomes in COVID-19patients (9, 10) have been reported
in some studies, with both qualitative and semiquantitative methods (11–13); fibrosis was a common finding at few weeks from the onset of the
symptoms (14–16).A recent study demonstrated that approximately one-third of COVID-19 survivors showed
pulmonary fibrotic-like changes at six-month follow-up Chest CT (17); nevertheless, as a novel pathological
entity, further long-term investigations are needed for a full comprehensive
knowledge of COVID-19 pulmonary sequelae. Indeed, there is great concern that some
of these findings will resolve over time, and are therefore not fibrosis (18).In fact, for previous different severe viral pneumonias, several studies demonstrated
how long-term lung impairment is a common sequelae (19); among them the long-term follow-up study on severe acute
respiratory syndrome (SARS) by Zhang et al. (20) and Wu et al. (21)
demonstrated the persisting pulmonary interstitial damage several months after
recovery.Thus, the aims of our study are: 1) to prospectively investigate Chest CT late
sequelae in patients affected by COVID-19 pneumonia at six-month follow-up and
comparing CT features with those present at baseline Chest CT; 2) to evaluate the
role of Chest CT and clinical parameters in predicting pulmonary fibrotic-like
changes at six-month follow-up.
Materials and Methods
Patient Population and Study Design
This prospective study was approved by our local institutional review board and
written informed consent was obtained from all study participants.Patients admitted at Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Rome, Italy, from
March 19th, 2020 to May 24th, 2020, with the both following inclusion criteria
of (a) selected patients with diagnosis of moderate to severe COVID-19 (22), confirmed by reverse transcription
polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) who underwent Chest CT and (b) positive
baseline Chest CT scans with diagnosis of interstitial pneumonia performed at
admission, were prospectively enrolled for a six-month follow-up Chest-CT
evaluation. In order to define the severity of COVID-19 pneumonia, the
WHO's interim guidance diagnostic criteria for adults with severe
COVID-19 pneumonia were used (22).Exclusion criteria were as follows: (a) patientdeath during follow-up interval;
(b) refusal of the patient to undergo follow-up Chest CT; (c) severe motion
artifacts at first Chest CT.On the day of follow-up CT, all patients filled out a questionnaire about the
long-lasting symptoms after COVID-19, the smoking habit; oxygen saturation was
also measured and recorded for each patient. Patients' demographic
characteristics, clinical findings, laboratory results and eventual ventilation
support and corticosteroid therapy during the hospitalization were also
retrieved from the internal hospital records.
CT Acquisition Technique
All patients underwent six-month (± 14 days) follow-up unenhanced Chest CT
scans. Chest CT acquisitions were obtained with the patients in supine position
during end-inspiration without contrast medium injection. Chest CT was performed
on a 128-slice CT (GE Revolution EVO CT Scanner, GE Medical Systems, Milwaukee,
WI, USA). The following technical parameters were used: tube voltage: 120 kV;
tube current modulation 100-250 mAs; spiral pitch factor: 0.98; collimation
width: 0.625. Reconstructions were made with convolution kernel BONEPLUS at a
slice thickness of 1.25mm.
Qualitative Analysis
DICOM data were transferred into a PACS workstation (Centricity Universal Viewer
v.6.0, GE Medical Systems, Milwaukee, WI, USA). Two radiologists in consensus
(AC and CDD, with 5 and 20 years in thoracic imaging experience respectively),
qualitatively analyzed Chest CT images and evaluated the presence of motion
artifacts. The following CT findings were recorded: (a) GGOs, (b) GGOs pattern,
(c) GGOs location, (d) multilobe involvement, (e) total lobar involvement, (f)
bilateral distribution, (g) location of consolidation or GGOs, (h)
consolidation, (i) interlobular septal thickening, (j) fibrotic-like changes
(reticular pattern and/or honeycombing) (23), (k) bronchiectasis, (l) air bronchogram, (m) bronchial wall
thickening, (n) pulmonary nodules surrounded by GGOs, (o) halo sign or reversed
halo sign, (p) pleural and (q) pericardial effusion, (r) lymphadenopathy
(defined as lymph node with short axis > 10mm) (s) subsegmental vessel
enlargement (≥3mm) and (t) pulmonary trunk diameter (<31mm).All mentioned Chest CT findings were defined as in the Fleischner Society
glossary (24).
Lung Severity Score Analysis
The presence of GGOs, consolidation and fibrotic-like changes were
semi-quantitatively analyzed in consensus by the same two radiologists
above-mentioned, using the LSS ranging from 0 to 40 points, previously used in
literature to quantify COVID-19 pneumonia lung impairment (25). Ten segments for each lung were considered; each
segment was evaluated 0-2 points on the basis of the area involved, with score 0
for normal parenchyma, 1 for less than 50% segmental involvement and 2
for up to 50% segmental involvement. The final LSS was obtained from the
sum of all lung's segments; furthermore, individual segmental scores were
added together in total score to perform the statistical analysis.
Quantification Chest CT Analysis
Other two radiologists in consensus (GG and DC, with 3 and 7 years of experience
in thoracic imaging respectively) performed QCCT analysis to quantify
well-aerated lung by using a dedicated software (Thoracic VCAR v13.1, GE).
Attenuation value < −1000 HU was used to exclude trachea air from
the analysis, before segmentation. In order to select well-aerated lung for
software segmentation, a range between -950 HU and -700 HU density, was selected
(26–28). The software automatically calculated the healthy lung
expressed both in percentage and liters; in case of unsatisfactory or incorrect
lung segmentation, the radiologists manually adjust the lung contours.
Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 21.0 (SPSS Inc. Chicago,
IL) and MedCalc Statistical Software version 17.9.7 (MedCalc Software bvba,
Ostend, Belgium). P values <.05 were considered statistically
significant. All data are expressed as mean ± Standard Deviation (SD).
Categorical variables were described as counts and percentage; qualitative CT
findings comparison was performed using the Chi-square test. The comparison
between baseline and follow-up LSS and well-aerated lung QCCT analysis were
tested with Student's t test in case of Gaussian
distribution of data, otherwise while Wilcoxon test was applied.Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and Area under the curve (AUC)
were calculated to test the performance of the baseline LSS and QCCT to predict
fibrotic-like changes at six-month follow-up Chest CT. Univariable and backward
multivariable logistic regression analysis were used to test clinical and
radiological features as predictor of fibrotic-like changes at six-month
follow-up. At first, univariable analysis was individually performed on clinical
variables: age, gender, comorbidities (dichotomizing with presence/absence),
smoking habit (dichotomizing with present and former smoker grouped together and
non-smokers), and baseline parameters as cough, dyspnea, fever, CRP, d-Dimer,
LDH, lymphocytes, saturation, ventilation support; baseline radiological
variables as LSS, pulmonary bilateral involvement, consolidations and
well-aerated lung QCCT analysis (L and %). The multivariable analysis was
performed on three different models: the clinical model included age, gender,
comorbidities, smoking habit, cough, dyspnea, fever, CRP, d-Dimer, LDH,
lymphocytes, saturation at admission and ventilation support; the radiological
model contained LSS, pulmonary bilateral involvement, consolidations and
well-aerated lung QCCT analysis (L and %); finally the combined model
comprised all these parameters.
Results
Patient population, clinical data and laboratory findings
From an initial population of 288 patients, 98 (34%) died during the
follow-up period, 45 (16%) refused the follow-up Chest CT since already
performed elsewhere and 27 (9.4%) patients were excluded for the presence
of severe motion artifacts on Chest CT at admission; thus, the final population
comprised 118 patients, 56 male (48%), mean age 65 ± 12 years
(range 37-84 years). The enrollment flowchart of the study is showed in .
Figure 1.
Enrollment flow-chart of the study. From an initial cohort of 288
Patients, 118 patients with both baseline and six-month follow-up Chest
CT were enrolled.
Enrollment flow-chart of the study. From an initial cohort of 288
Patients, 118 patients with both baseline and six-month follow-up Chest
CT were enrolled.Twenty-four/118 (20%) patients had smoking habit, 27/118 (23%) had
quit tobacco and 67/118 (57%) had never smoked. Twenty-four/118 patients
(20%) had one underlying comorbidities, while 58/118 patients
(49%) had two or more comorbidities; common comorbidities included
hypertension (40/118 cases, 34%), cardiovascular diseases (18/118 cases,
15%) and diabetes mellitus (11/118 cases, 9%).Ninety-one/118 patients (77%) reported persisting or new symptoms,
including cough (22/91, 24%), dyspnea (38/91, 42%), fatigue (7/91,
8%), GI symptoms (15/91, 17%), hair loss (18/91, 20%),
decline of visual acuity (11/91, 12%), olfactory and gustatory
dysfunctions (13/91, 14% and 18/91, 20%, respectively); 27/118
patients (23%) were asymptomatic and mean oxygen saturation was
97% ± 1.97.Full data about patients' demographics, clinical records, laboratory
findings and eventual ventilation support and corticosteroid therapy are
reported in .
Table 1:
Patient Population, Clinical Data, and Laboratory Findings
Patient Population, Clinical Data, and Laboratory FindingsAt six-month Chest CT follow-up, 33/118 (28%) presented with normal lungs.
Eight-five/118 (72%) patients presented with fibrotic-like changes,
49/118 (42%) with GGOs, peripheral in distribution in 40/118 (34%)
cases. Multilobe involvement (≥ 2 lobes) was observed in 45/118
(38%) patients and involvement of all lobes in 16/118 (14%) cases.
Interstitial septal thickening was detected in 33/118 (28%) cases and
consolidative opacities were observed in 2/118 patient (2%).All Chest CT findings were reduced at follow-up Chest CT, except for the
fibrotic-like changes which was the only feature showing a significant increase
(all p<.05). Full results about the follow-up Chest CT findings and the
comparison with baseline Chest CT findings are shown in .
Table 2:
Comparison between Baseline and Follow-up Chest CT Findings in COVID-19
Patients
Comparison between Baseline and Follow-up Chest CT Findings in COVID-19PatientsChest CT examples of baseline and six-month follow-up are shown in and .
Figure 2.
(a) Baseline and (b) six-month follow-up axial
thin-section unenhanced Chest CT scans of 83-year-old man, former
smokers, who presented fever, cough and worsening dyspnea; COVID-19 was
confirmed by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)
testing. (a) Baseline scan shows multiple bilateral and
confluent ground-glass opacities with predominantly linear pattern and
peripheral distribution (red arrows). (b) Six-month
follow-up scan shows complete resolution of ground-glass opacities
without fibrotic-like changes.
Figure 3.
(a,b) Baseline and (c,d) six-month follow-up
axial thin-section unenhanced Chest CT scans of 84-year-old man, smoker,
admitted to the Emergency Department presenting fever and cough;
COVID-19 was confirmed by reverse transcription polymerase chain
reaction (RT-PCR) testing. (a,b) Images show bilateral
consolidative pulmonary opacities (black arrow) with diffuse
ground-glass opacities and interstitial septal thickening (red arrow).
(c,d) Six-month follow-up scans show residual
ground-glass opacities with decreased density compared to baseline,
interstitial septal thickening and peripheral fibrotic-like changes
(white arrows).
(a) Baseline and (b) six-month follow-up axial
thin-section unenhanced Chest CT scans of 83-year-old man, former
smokers, who presented fever, cough and worsening dyspnea; COVID-19 was
confirmed by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)
testing. (a) Baseline scan shows multiple bilateral and
confluent ground-glass opacities with predominantly linear pattern and
peripheral distribution (red arrows). (b) Six-month
follow-up scan shows complete resolution of ground-glass opacities
without fibrotic-like changes.(a,b) Baseline and (c,d) six-month follow-up
axial thin-section unenhanced Chest CT scans of 84-year-old man, smoker,
admitted to the Emergency Department presenting fever and cough;
COVID-19 was confirmed by reverse transcription polymerase chain
reaction (RT-PCR) testing. (a,b) Images show bilateral
consolidative pulmonary opacities (black arrow) with diffuse
ground-glass opacities and interstitial septal thickening (red arrow).
(c,d) Six-month follow-up scans show residual
ground-glass opacities with decreased density compared to baseline,
interstitial septal thickening and peripheral fibrotic-like changes
(white arrows).At six-month follow-up total LSS was 4.37 ± 5.29 (range 0-20; LSS in right
and left lung 2.15 ± 2.68 and 2.22 ± 2.79 respectively), showing a
significant decrease compared with the total sum of baseline LSS 15.34 ±
8.32 (range 0-30; LSS in the right and left lung 7.58 ± 4.13 and 7.75
± 4.71 respectively), (all p<.001). A per-segment analysis was
also performed and fully reported in .
Table 3:
Comparison between Baseline and Follow-up Lung Severity Score
Comparison between Baseline and Follow-up Lung Severity Score
Quantitative Chest CT Analysis
Six-month follow-up QCCT analysis of well-aerated lung expressed in percentage
and liters was 82% ± 12.27 and 3.84 L ± 1.34, respectively,
showing significant differences compared to baseline (69% ± 18.2
and 2.99 L ± 1.5, all p<.001). An example of baseline and
follow-up comparison QCCT analysis is provided in .
Figure 4.
(a,b) Baseline and (c,d) six-month follow-up
coronal thin-section unenhanced Chest CT scans of 79-year-old man,
admitted to the Emergency Department presenting fever, dyspnea and
cough; COVID-19 was confirmed by reverse transcription polymerase chain
reaction (RT-PCR) testing. (a) Chest CT scan shows
bilateral ground-glass opacities tending to consolidation (black arrow).
(b) The same scan after Quantitative Chest CT Analysis
highlighted in light-blue well-aerated lung (1.5 liters, 50%) and
in yellow pulmonary injury of COVID-19 pneumonia. (c)
Six-month follow-up scan shows residual fibrotic-like changes (white
arrows) and persisting of low-density ground glass (asterisks).
(d) The same scan after Quantitative Chest CT Analysis
highlighted in light-blue well-aerated lung (3.5 liters, 82%) and
in yellow residual findings of COVID-19 pneumonia at six months
follow-up.
(a,b) Baseline and (c,d) six-month follow-up
coronal thin-section unenhanced Chest CT scans of 79-year-old man,
admitted to the Emergency Department presenting fever, dyspnea and
cough; COVID-19 was confirmed by reverse transcription polymerase chain
reaction (RT-PCR) testing. (a) Chest CT scan shows
bilateral ground-glass opacities tending to consolidation (black arrow).
(b) The same scan after Quantitative Chest CT Analysis
highlighted in light-blue well-aerated lung (1.5 liters, 50%) and
in yellow pulmonary injury of COVID-19 pneumonia. (c)
Six-month follow-up scan shows residual fibrotic-like changes (white
arrows) and persisting of low-density ground glass (asterisks).
(d) The same scan after Quantitative Chest CT Analysis
highlighted in light-blue well-aerated lung (3.5 liters, 82%) and
in yellow residual findings of COVID-19 pneumonia at six months
follow-up.
ROC curves and logistic regression
Baseline LSS showed an excellent performance in predicting fibrotic-like changes
at six-month Chest CT follow-up with AUC of .91, 95%CI .8-.97,
sensitivity of 88% and specificity of 80% when the LSS cutoff was
>14. Baseline QCCT of well-aerated lung, expressed both in liters and
percentage, showed an AUC of .88 (95%CI .77-.96, sensitivity of
86%, specificity of 80%, cutoff of ≤3.75L) and .88
(95%CI .76-.95, sensitivity of 74%, specificity of 100%,
cutoff of ≤80%), respectively, as shown in .
Figure 5.
(a) Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves tested
the performance of baseline lung severity score to predict fibrotic-like
changes at six-month follow-up Chest CT, showing an area under the curve
(AUC) of .91, 95%CI .8-.97, sensitivity of 88% and
specificity of 80% when the cut-off was >14.
(b,c) ROC curves tested the performance of baseline
quantitative Chest CT (QCCT) analysis of well-aerated lung, expressed in
percentage (b) and Liters (c) to predict
fibrotic-like changes at six-month follow-up Chest CT: (b)
with the cut-off of ≤3.8L an AUC of .88, 95%CI .77-.96, a
sensitivity of 86% and a specificity of 80% was found,
(c) the cut-off of ≤80% showed an AUC of
.88, 95%CI .76-.95, 74% of sensitivity and 100% of
specificity.
(a) Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves tested
the performance of baseline lung severity score to predict fibrotic-like
changes at six-month follow-up Chest CT, showing an area under the curve
(AUC) of .91, 95%CI .8-.97, sensitivity of 88% and
specificity of 80% when the cut-off was >14.
(b,c) ROC curves tested the performance of baseline
quantitative Chest CT (QCCT) analysis of well-aerated lung, expressed in
percentage (b) and Liters (c) to predict
fibrotic-like changes at six-month follow-up Chest CT: (b)
with the cut-off of ≤3.8L an AUC of .88, 95%CI .77-.96, a
sensitivity of 86% and a specificity of 80% was found,
(c) the cut-off of ≤80% showed an AUC of
.88, 95%CI .76-.95, 74% of sensitivity and 100% of
specificity.In the univariable analysis, age >65 (OR, 1.1; 95%CI, 1.03-1.17;
p=.004) and baseline LSS (OR, 1.15; 95%CI, 1.05-1.25;
p=.003) have proven to be significant positive independent variable for
fibrotic-like changes at six-month follow-up Chest CT (all p<.05). On the
other side, male gender (OR, .33; 95%CI, .92-1.14; p=.002),
saturation=96-97 (OR, .13; 95%CI, .02-.95; p=.04), the
absence of the need for ventilation (OR, .16; 95%CI, .04-.63;
p=.008), bilateral lung involvement (OR, .28; 95%CI, .06-.92;
p=.04), pulmonary consolidations (OR, .27; 95%CI, .08-.96;
p=.04) and baseline QCCT well-aerated lung expressed in liters (OR, .4;
95%CI, .22-.71; p=.002) and in percentage (OR, .93; 95%CI,
.88-.99; p=.01), showed significant inverse correlation for the presence
of fibrotic-like changes at six-month follow-up Chest CT (all p<.05).In the multivariable clinical model analysis, the best positive predictors of
fibrotic-like changes at six-month follow-up Chest CT were age >65 years
(OR, 1.12; 95%CI, 1.03-1.21; p=.007) and the need for mechanical
ventilation (OR, 14.02; 95%CI, 1.07-185.55; p=.04). Otherwise, the
radiological model showed an inverse correlation between quantified well-aerated
lung and fibrotic-like changes (OR, .4; 95%CI, .22-.71; p=.002).
Finally, the combined model showed that male gender (OR, .03; 95%CI,
.001-.89; p=.04), cough (OR, .08; 95%CI, .01-.88; p=.04),
lymphocytosis (OR, .08; 95%CI, .01-.86; p=.04) and QCCT
well-aerated lung expressed in liters (OR, .05; 95%CI, .01-1.19;
p=.03) were significant predictors of fibrotic-like changes at six-month
follow-up with an inverse correlation. Univariable and multivariable logistic
regression analysis full results are shown in .
Table 4:
Univariable and Multivariable Logistic Regression Analysis: The
Relationship between Clinical and Radiological Variables in 118 Patients
with Moderate to Severe COVID-19 at Six-month Follow-up CT
Univariable and Multivariable Logistic Regression Analysis: The
Relationship between Clinical and Radiological Variables in 118 Patients
with Moderate to Severe COVID-19 at Six-month Follow-up CTDiagnostic performance of the three models is reported in . AUC was .89 (95%CI .77-.96,
sensitivity 82%, specificity 93%) for the clinical model, .81 for
the radiological model (95%CI .68-.9, sensitivity 84%, specificity
67%) and .92 for the combined model (95%CI .81-.97, sensitivity
100%, specificity 73%). Even if the clinical model already
performed well, combined model was analyzed too, in order to fully investigate
possible stronger results with data derived from different fields of
investigation.
Figure 6.
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves tested the performance of
clinical (blue line), radiological (green line) and combined model
(orange line) in predicting the presence of fibrotic-like changes at
six-month follow-up Chest CT. The AUC for the clinical model was .89
(95%CI .77-.96, sensitivity: 82%, specificity:
93%), .81 for radiological model (95%CI .68-.9,
sensitivity: 84%, specificity: 67%,) and .92 for combined
model (95%CI .81-.97, sensitivity: 100%, specificity:
73%).
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves tested the performance of
clinical (blue line), radiological (green line) and combined model
(orange line) in predicting the presence of fibrotic-like changes at
six-month follow-up Chest CT. The AUC for the clinical model was .89
(95%CI .77-.96, sensitivity: 82%, specificity:
93%), .81 for radiological model (95%CI .68-.9,
sensitivity: 84%, specificity: 67%,) and .92 for combined
model (95%CI .81-.97, sensitivity: 100%, specificity:
73%).
Discussion
The results of our study showed that 72% of patients showed fibrotic-like
changes at six-month follow-up Chest CT and baseline LSS (>14) was an
excellent predictor of fibrotic-like changes (AUC .91). Furthermore, in the
multivariable analysis, a model combining clinical and radiological findings reached
an excellent diagnostic performance (AUC 0.92). In this model male gender, cough,
lymphocytosis and QCCT well-aerated lung expressed in liters showed an inverse
correlation with lung fibrotic-like changes. Even if the clinical model already
performed well (AUC .89), we decided to analyze also the combined model to fully
investigate possible stronger results with data derived from different fields of
investigation. The percentage of late sequelae of our population at six-month
follow-up Chest CT (72%) is in agreement with the study conducted by Zhao et
al. (75%) who found that the most common feature at three-month follow-up was
interstitial septal thickening (27 % vs our study 28%) (10). On the other hand, our results differ from
those of Tabatabaei et al. who reported residual CT findings in 42% of
patients examined at three-month follow-up; among them 55% presented residual
GGOs (42%) (9). These different results
may be related to the younger age of their population and the lower percentage of
patients hospitalized in intensive care unit (ICU), compared to our older population
with a higher rate of ventilation support needed during hospitalization. In fact,
the older age increased the need for ventilation support and might be related with a
more aggressive damage on lung parenchyma, with consequent higher percentage of late
sequelae (29). Further studies of long-term
effects in COVID-19patients are mandatory to confirm this hypothesis.A remarkable six-month follow-up study performed by Han et al. (17) showed approximately one-third (35%) of COVID-19
survivors with pulmonary fibrotic-like changes while 62% of patients
presented GGOs. In our population, fibrotic-like changes do not arise de novo, but
evolved from GGOs and/or consolidations. Discrepancies with our results might be
related with demographics differences such as the prevalence of male and younger
patients, even if demographic data on fibrosis development are still lacking and
confirmation on Chest CT are needed on larger population sample. In addition, all
non-fibrotic-like abnormalities have been reduced at six months, probably because
almost all our patients have received steroid therapy during hospitalization.As a novel disease, it is crucial to perform risk stratification of COVID-19patients
already at baseline stage, in order to identify who will be at high risk to develop
residual disease hereafter.In fact, recent studies have found that semiquantitative Chest CT score is a useful
tool to stratify the severity of pneumonia and to predict clinical and radiological
outcome in COVID-19patients at short-term follow-up (9, 10, 30). Our baseline LSS showed an optimal performance in
predicting residual findings at follow-up Chest CT (AUC .91); seventy-six patients
(64.4%) presented a baseline LSS higher than 14. This result supports a
similar analysis conducted at three-month follow-up by Tabatabaei et al. (9) and Zhao et al. (10) who demonstrated that patients with residual lung disease
had significantly higher CT severity score compared to the group completely healed.
Also the total Chest CT score performed by Han et al. (17) showed correlation in predicting pulmonary fibrotic-like
changes at six-month follow-up Chest CT, despite some differences between the two
lung score performed.Likewise, baseline QCCT analysis of well-aerated lung demonstrated a good performance
to predict residual findings at follow-up Chest CT, expressed in both liters (AUC
.88) and percentage (AUC .88). Our results concerning the role of QCCT well-aerated
lung support the previous study conducted by Colombi et al. (27) who showed that low rate of well-aerated lung was a
predictor of ICU admission or death, and by Lanza et al. (31) who demonstrated that compromised lung volume was a
predictor for oxygen support, need for intubation needed and patientdeath.In line with the study conducted at short-term follow-up by Yu et al. (14), we found that older age is a potential
predictor of six-month fibrotic-like changes. Moreover, we found that fibrotic-like
changes at Chest CT follow-up were more frequent in women. In previous mid-term
follow-up studies (9, 10) no significant correlation between gender and follow-up
fibrotic-like changes were found (32).Even if the clinical model already performed well (AUC .89), we decided to analyze
also the combined model to fully investigate possible stronger results with data
derived from different fields of investigation. Despite the encouraging results, our
study had some limitations. First, the relatively small sample size; second, the
potential selection bias due to patients' refusal to undergo follow-up CT
examinations at our Hospital since already performed in other centers; third, the
inter- and intra-reader agreement was not performed.In conclusion, at six-month follow-up, 72% of patients showed late sequelae,
in particular fibrotic-like changes. Baseline LSS and QCCT of well-aerated lung
showed an excellent performance in predicting fibrotic-like changes at six-month
Chest CT (AUC > .88). Male gender, cough, lymphocytosis and QCCT well-aerated
lung (liters) were significant predictors of fibrotic-like changes at six-month with
an inverse correlation (AUC .92).
Authors: Thomas Sonnweber; Piotr Tymoszuk; Sabina Sahanic; Anna Boehm; Alex Pizzini; Anna Luger; Christoph Schwabl; Manfred Nairz; Philipp Grubwieser; Katharina Kurz; Sabine Koppelstätter; Magdalena Aichner; Bernhard Puchner; Alexander Egger; Gregor Hoermann; Ewald Wöll; Günter Weiss; Gerlig Widmann; Ivan Tancevski; Judith Löffler-Ragg Journal: Elife Date: 2022-02-08 Impact factor: 8.140
Authors: Carlos Roberto Ribeiro Carvalho; Rodrigo Caruso Chate; Marcio Valente Yamada Sawamura; Michelle Louvaes Garcia; Celina Almeida Lamas; Diego Armando Cardona Cardenas; Daniel Mario Lima; Paula Gobi Scudeller; João Marcos Salge; Cesar Higa Nomura; Marco Antonio Gutierrez Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2022-06-13 Impact factor: 3.006
Authors: Bavithra Vijayakumar; James Tonkin; Anand Devaraj; Keir E J Philip; Christopher M Orton; Sujal R Desai; Pallav L Shah Journal: Radiology Date: 2021-10-05 Impact factor: 29.146