Literature DB >> 34311291

Sexual dimorphisms in three-dimensional masticatory muscle attachment morphometry regulates temporomandibular joint mechanics.

Xin She1, Shuchun Sun1, Brooke J Damon2, Cherice N Hill2, Matthew C Coombs2, Feng Wei1, Michael K Lecholop3, Martin B Steed3, Thierry H Bacro4, Elizabeth H Slate5, Naiquan Zheng6, Janice S Lee7, Hai Yao8.   

Abstract

Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disorders disproportionally affect females, with female to male prevalence varying from 3:1 to 8:1. Sexual dimorphisms in masticatory muscle attachment morphometry and association with craniofacial size, critical for understanding sex-differences in TMJ function, have not been reported. The objective of this study was to determine sex-specific differences in three-dimensional (3D) TMJ muscle attachment morphometry and craniofacial sizes and their impact on TMJ mechanics. Human cadaveric TMJ muscle attachment morphometry and craniofacial anthropometry (10Males; 11Females) were determined by previously developed 3D digitization and imaging-based methods. Sex-differences in muscle attachment morphometry and craniofacial anthropometry, and their correlation were determined, respectively using multivariate general linear and linear regression statistical models. Subject-specific musculoskeletal models of the mandible were developed to determine effects of sexual dimorphisms in mandibular size and TMJ muscle attachment morphometry on joint loading during static biting. There were significant sex-differences in craniofacial size (p = 0.024) and TMJ muscle attachment morphometry (p < 0.001). TMJ muscle attachment morphometry was significantly correlated with craniofacial size. TMJ contact forces estimated from biomechanical models were significantly, 23% on average (p < 0.001), greater for females compared to those for males when generating the same bite forces. There were significant linear correlations between TMJ contact force and both 3D mandibular length (R2 = 0.48, p < 0.001) and muscle force moment arm ratio (R2 = 0.68, p < 0.001). Sexual dimorphisms in masticatory muscle morphology and craniofacial sizes play critical roles in subject-specific TMJ biomechanics. Sex-specific differences in the TMJ mechanical environment should be further investigated concerning mechanical fatigue of TMJ discs associated with TMJ disorders.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Craniofacial morphology; Muscle attachment; Musculoskeletal modelling; Sexual dimorphism; Temporomandibular joint

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34311291      PMCID: PMC8453136          DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110623

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.789


  51 in total

1.  Cranial change in Americans: 1850-1975.

Authors:  R L Jantz
Journal:  J Forensic Sci       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 1.832

2.  Study methods, recruitment, sociodemographic findings, and demographic representativeness in the OPPERA study.

Authors:  Gary D Slade; Eric Bair; Kunthel By; Flora Mulkey; Cristina Baraian; Rebecca Rothwell; Maria Reynolds; Vanessa Miller; Yoly Gonzalez; Sharon Gordon; Margarete Ribeiro-Dasilva; Pei Feng Lim; Joel D Greenspan; Ron Dubner; Roger B Fillingim; Luda Diatchenko; William Maixner; Dawn Dampier; Charles Knott; Richard Ohrbach
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 5.820

3.  Dynamic stereometry of the temporomandibular joint.

Authors:  S Palla; L M Gallo; D Gössi
Journal:  Orthod Craniofac Res       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.826

4.  Variation of mandibular sexual dimorphism across human facial patterns.

Authors:  J A Alarcón; M Bastir; A Rosas
Journal:  Homo       Date:  2016-01-23

5.  Relationships between jaw muscle cross-sections and craniofacial morphology in normal adults, studied with magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  P H van Spronsen; W A Weijs; J Valk; B Prahl-Andersen; F C van Ginkel
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Craniofacial characteristics as determinants of age, race and sex in forensic dentistry. A hands-on guide.

Authors:  C T Botha
Journal:  J Forensic Odontostomatol       Date:  1991-12

7.  Reliability of electromyographic activity vs. bite-force from human masticatory muscles.

Authors:  Y Gonzalez; L R Iwasaki; W D McCall; R Ohrbach; E Lozier; J C Nickel
Journal:  Eur J Oral Sci       Date:  2011-05-05       Impact factor: 2.612

8.  EMG activities of two heads of the human lateral pterygoid muscle in relation to mandibular condyle movement and biting force.

Authors:  K Hiraba; K Hibino; K Hiranuma; T Negoro
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Correlations between the cross-sectional area of the jaw muscles and craniofacial size and shape.

Authors:  W A Weijs; B Hillen
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 2.868

10.  Effect of Measurement Technique on TMJ Mandibular Condyle and Articular Disc Morphometry: CBCT, MRI, and Physical Measurements.

Authors:  Matthew C Coombs; Daniel J Bonthius; Xingju Nie; Michael K Lecholop; Martin B Steed; Hai Yao
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2018-07-10       Impact factor: 1.895

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.