Literature DB >> 26852041

Variation of mandibular sexual dimorphism across human facial patterns.

J A Alarcón1, M Bastir2, A Rosas2.   

Abstract

This study analysed how sex-specific features differed in male and female adult mandibles throughout the spectrum of vertical facial patterns (i.e., meso-, dolicho- and brachyfacial) and sagittal variations (the so-called skeletal Classes I, II and III; normal maxillo-mandibular relationship, maxillary prognathism vs. mandibular retrognathism, and maxillary retrognathism vs. mandibular prognathism, respectively). Specifically, we test the hypothesis that sexual dimorphism in the mandible is independent of such facial vertical and sagittal patterns. A sample of 187 European adults (92 males, 95 females; age range, 20-30 years; mean age 25.6 years, sd=4.2 years) from Granada (southern Spain) were randomly selected and grouped according to the standard cephalometric criteria of the sagittal and vertical patterns. Geometric morphometrics were used to analyse the size (centroid size) and shape (principal components analysis, mean shape comparisons) of the mandible. The patterns of sexual dimorphism were evaluated with a generalised linear model with interaction term. We found that sagittal and vertical facial patterns are associated with different mandibular morphologies (size and shape). Also, sexual dimorphism was present in all comparisons. The hypothesis was rejected only for vertical facial patterns. That is, the nature of sexual dimorphism was similar among the skeletal classes but different (e.g., distribution of dimorphic variables, interaction term) in meso-, dolicho-, and brachyfacial mandibles. In conclusion, sex-specific mandibular traits behave in a different way across vertical facial patterns. These results imply that an assessment of the vertical facial pattern of the individual is required before a sexual diagnosis of the mandible is proposed.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26852041     DOI: 10.1016/j.jchb.2015.11.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Homo        ISSN: 0018-442X


  3 in total

1.  Which one closes extraction spaces faster: en masse retraction or two-step retraction? A randomized prospective clinical trial.

Authors:  Patricia Pigato Schneider; Ki Beom Kim; André da Costa Monini; Ary Dos Santos-Pinto; Luiz Gonzaga Gandini
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Sexual dimorphisms in three-dimensional masticatory muscle attachment morphometry regulates temporomandibular joint mechanics.

Authors:  Xin She; Shuchun Sun; Brooke J Damon; Cherice N Hill; Matthew C Coombs; Feng Wei; Michael K Lecholop; Martin B Steed; Thierry H Bacro; Elizabeth H Slate; Naiquan Zheng; Janice S Lee; Hai Yao
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2021-07-10       Impact factor: 2.789

3.  Three-dimensional photographic analysis of the face in European adults from southern Spain with normal occlusion: reference anthropometric measurements.

Authors:  M L Menéndez López-Mateos; J Carreño-Carreño; J C Palma; J A Alarcón; C Menéndez López-Mateos; M Menéndez-Núñez
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 2.757

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.