BACKGROUND: Guinea worm (Dracunculus medinensis) was detected in Chad in 2010 after a supposed ten-year absence, posing a challenge to the global eradication effort. Initiation of a village-based surveillance system in 2012 revealed a substantial number of dogs infected with Guinea worm, raising questions about paratenic hosts and cross-species transmission. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We coupled genomic and surveillance case data from 2012-2018 to investigate the modes of transmission between dog and human hosts and the geographic connectivity of worms. Eighty-six variants across four genes in the mitochondrial genome identified 41 genetically distinct worm genotypes. Spatiotemporal modeling revealed worms with the same genotype ('genetically identical') were within a median range of 18.6 kilometers of each other, but largely within approximately 50 kilometers. Genetically identical worms varied in their degree of spatial clustering, suggesting there may be different factors that favor or constrain transmission. Each worm was surrounded by five to ten genetically distinct worms within a 50 kilometer radius. As expected, we observed a change in the genetic similarity distribution between pairs of worms using variants across the complete mitochondrial genome in an independent population. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: In the largest study linking genetic and surveillance data to date of Guinea worm cases in Chad, we show genetic identity and modeling can facilitate the understanding of local transmission. The co-occurrence of genetically non-identical worms in quantitatively identified transmission ranges highlights the necessity for genomic tools to link cases. The improved discrimination between pairs of worms from variants identified across the complete mitochondrial genome suggests that expanding the number of genomic markers could link cases at a finer scale. These results suggest that scaling up genomic surveillance for Guinea worm may provide additional value for programmatic decision-making critical for monitoring cases and intervention efficacy to achieve elimination.
BACKGROUND:Guinea worm (Dracunculus medinensis) was detected in Chad in 2010 after a supposed ten-year absence, posing a challenge to the global eradication effort. Initiation of a village-based surveillance system in 2012 revealed a substantial number of dogsinfected with Guinea worm, raising questions about paratenic hosts and cross-species transmission. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We coupled genomic and surveillance case data from 2012-2018 to investigate the modes of transmission between dog and human hosts and the geographic connectivity of worms. Eighty-six variants across four genes in the mitochondrial genome identified 41 genetically distinct worm genotypes. Spatiotemporal modeling revealed worms with the same genotype ('genetically identical') were within a median range of 18.6 kilometers of each other, but largely within approximately 50 kilometers. Genetically identical worms varied in their degree of spatial clustering, suggesting there may be different factors that favor or constrain transmission. Each worm was surrounded by five to ten genetically distinct worms within a 50 kilometer radius. As expected, we observed a change in the genetic similarity distribution between pairs of worms using variants across the complete mitochondrial genome in an independent population. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: In the largest study linking genetic and surveillance data to date of Guinea worm cases in Chad, we show genetic identity and modeling can facilitate the understanding of local transmission. The co-occurrence of genetically non-identical worms in quantitatively identified transmission ranges highlights the necessity for genomic tools to link cases. The improved discrimination between pairs of worms from variants identified across the complete mitochondrial genome suggests that expanding the number of genomic markers could link cases at a finer scale. These results suggest that scaling up genomic surveillance for Guinea worm may provide additional value for programmatic decision-making critical for monitoring cases and intervention efficacy to achieve elimination.
Authors: Duygu Balcan; Vittoria Colizza; Bruno Gonçalves; Hao Hu; José J Ramasco; Alessandro Vespignani Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2009-12-14 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Tori L Cowger; Cara C Burns; Salmaan Sharif; Howard E Gary; Jane Iber; Elizabeth Henderson; Farzana Malik; Syed Sohail Zahoor Zaidi; Shahzad Shaukat; Lubna Rehman; Mark A Pallansch; Walter A Orenstein Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-07-25 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Philippe Lemey; Andrew Rambaut; Trevor Bedford; Nuno Faria; Filip Bielejec; Guy Baele; Colin A Russell; Derek J Smith; Oliver G Pybus; Dirk Brockmann; Marc A Suchard Journal: PLoS Pathog Date: 2014-02-20 Impact factor: 6.823
Authors: Mark L Eberhard; Christopher A Cleveland; Hubert Zirimwabagabo; Michael J Yabsley; Philippe Tchindebet Ouakou; Ernesto Ruiz-Tiben Journal: Emerg Infect Dis Date: 2016-11-15 Impact factor: 6.883
Authors: Wesley Wong; Sarah Volkman; Rachel Daniels; Stephen Schaffner; Mouhamad Sy; Yaye Die Ndiaye; Aida S Badiane; Awa B Deme; Mamadou Alpha Diallo; Jules Gomis; Ngayo Sy; Daouda Ndiaye; Dyann F Wirth; Daniel L Hartl Journal: PNAS Nexus Date: 2022-09-10
Authors: Donald R Hopkins; Adam Weiss; Fernando J Torres-Velez; Sarah G H Sapp; Kashef Ijaz Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2022-06-27 Impact factor: 3.707
Authors: Todd A Castoe; David D Pollock; Elizabeth J Carlton; Andrea J Lund; Kristen J Wade; Zachary L Nikolakis; Kathleen N Ivey; Blair W Perry; Hamish N C Pike; Sara H Paull; Yang Liu Journal: Elife Date: 2022-08-30 Impact factor: 8.713