Zackary S Cicone, Brett S Nickerson1, Youn-Jeng Choi2, Clifton J Holmes3, Bjoern Hornikel4, Michael V Fedewa4, Michael R Esco4. 1. College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Texas A&M International University, Laredo, TX. 2. Department of Education, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, REPUBLIC OF KOREA. 3. Program in Physical Therapy, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO. 4. Department of Kinesiology, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Anthropometric-based equations are used to estimate percent body fat (%BF) when laboratory methods are impractical or not available. However, because these equations are often derived from two-compartment models, they are prone to error because of the assumptions regarding fat-free mass composition. The purpose of this study was to develop a new anthropometric-based equation for the prediction of %BF, using a five-compartment (5C) model as the criterion measure. METHODS: A sample of healthy adults (52.2% female; age, 18 to 69 yr; body mass index, 15.7 to 49.5 kg·m-2) completed hydrostatic weighing, dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, and bioimpedance spectroscopy measurements for calculation of 5C %BF (%BF5C), as well as skinfolds and circumferences. %BF5C was regressed on anthropometric measures using hierarchical variable selection in a random sample of subjects (n = 279). The resulting equation was cross-validated in the remaining participants (n = 78). New model performance was also compared with several common anthropometric-based equations. RESULTS: The new equation [%BFNew = 6.083 + (0.143 × SSnew) - (12.058 × sex) - (0.150 × age) - (0.233 × body mass index) + (0.256 × waist) + (0.162 × sex × age)] explained a significant proportion of variance in %BF5C (R2 = 0.775, SEE = 4.0%). Predictors included sum of skinfolds (SSnew, midaxillary, triceps, and thigh) and waist circumference. The new equation cross-validated well against %BF5C when compared with other existing equations, producing a large intraclass correlation coefficient (0.90), small mean bias and limits of agreement (0.4% ± 8.6%), and small measures of error (SEE = 2.5%). CONCLUSIONS: %BFNew improved on previous anthropometric-based equations, providing better overall agreement and less error in %BF estimation. The equation described in this study may provide an accurate estimate of %BF5C in healthy adults when measurement is not practical.
INTRODUCTION: Anthropometric-based equations are used to estimate percent body fat (%BF) when laboratory methods are impractical or not available. However, because these equations are often derived from two-compartment models, they are prone to error because of the assumptions regarding fat-free mass composition. The purpose of this study was to develop a new anthropometric-based equation for the prediction of %BF, using a five-compartment (5C) model as the criterion measure. METHODS: A sample of healthy adults (52.2% female; age, 18 to 69 yr; body mass index, 15.7 to 49.5 kg·m-2) completed hydrostatic weighing, dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, and bioimpedance spectroscopy measurements for calculation of 5C %BF (%BF5C), as well as skinfolds and circumferences. %BF5C was regressed on anthropometric measures using hierarchical variable selection in a random sample of subjects (n = 279). The resulting equation was cross-validated in the remaining participants (n = 78). New model performance was also compared with several common anthropometric-based equations. RESULTS: The new equation [%BFNew = 6.083 + (0.143 × SSnew) - (12.058 × sex) - (0.150 × age) - (0.233 × body mass index) + (0.256 × waist) + (0.162 × sex × age)] explained a significant proportion of variance in %BF5C (R2 = 0.775, SEE = 4.0%). Predictors included sum of skinfolds (SSnew, midaxillary, triceps, and thigh) and waist circumference. The new equation cross-validated well against %BF5C when compared with other existing equations, producing a large intraclass correlation coefficient (0.90), small mean bias and limits of agreement (0.4% ± 8.6%), and small measures of error (SEE = 2.5%). CONCLUSIONS: %BFNew improved on previous anthropometric-based equations, providing better overall agreement and less error in %BF estimation. The equation described in this study may provide an accurate estimate of %BF5C in healthy adults when measurement is not practical.
Authors: Lance E Davidson; Jack Wang; John C Thornton; Zafar Kaleem; Federico Silva-Palacios; Richard N Pierson; Steven B Heymsfield; Dympna Gallagher Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2011-03 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: A S Jackson; P R Stanforth; J Gagnon; T Rankinen; A S Leon; D C Rao; J S Skinner; C Bouchard; J H Wilmore Journal: Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord Date: 2002-06
Authors: Jordan R Moon; Jeffrey R Stout; Abbie E Smith; Sarah E Tobkin; Christopher M Lockwood; Kristina L Kendall; Jennifer L Graef; David H Fukuda; Pablo B Costa; Matt S Stock; Kaelin C Young; Patrick S Tucker; Eonho Kim; Trent J Herda; Ashley A Walter; Steven L Ferguson; Vanessa D Sherk; Joel T Cramer Journal: Br J Nutr Date: 2010-07-12 Impact factor: 3.718
Authors: Brett S Nickerson; Michael R Esco; Phillip A Bishop; Michael V Fedewa; Ronald L Snarr; Brian M Kliszczewicz; Kyung-Shin Park Journal: J Strength Cond Res Date: 2018-01 Impact factor: 3.775
Authors: Virginia A Hughes; Walter R Frontera; Ronenn Roubenoff; William J Evans; Maria A Fiatarone Singh Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2002-08 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: José Ronaldo Ribeiro da Costa; Roberto Fernandes da Costa; Ciro Alexandre Mercês Goncalves; Michelle Vasconcelos de Oliveira Borges; Paulo Francisco De Almeida-Neto; Gilmara Gomes De Assis; Breno Guilherme De Araujo Tinoco Cabral; Paulo Moreira Silva Dantas Journal: Front Nutr Date: 2022-08-25