PURPOSE: Despite their widespread use in research and fitness settings, Durnin and Womersley's (DW) 1974 prediction equations using skinfold thickness to estimate body fat percent by hydrodensitometry have not been systematically evaluated in racial or ethnic groups using body fat percent measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (%BF(DXA)) as the standard. METHODS: This cross-sectional, population-based study examined whether the DW skinfold equations predict %BF(DXA) in a large, multiracial sample. Four skinfold measures (biceps, triceps, subscapular, and suprailiac), other clinical anthropometrics, and %BF(DXA) were obtained from 1675 healthy adults, age 18-110 yr, who were classified into four racial or ethnic categories: Caucasian, African American, Hispanic, or Asian. Predicted body fat percent using DW equations was compared with %BF(DXA) and evaluated within race/ethnicity- and sex-specific groups. RESULTS: Mean body fat percent predicted by DW equations was significantly different from %BF(DXA) in four of eight race/ethnicity- and sex-specific groups, particularly in Asian women and African American men (3.3 and 2.4 percentage point overestimates, respectively, P < 0.0001). New linear regression equations were developed estimating %BF(DXA) specific to each race/ethnicity and sex group, using the original DW skinfold sites. Body weight, height, and waist circumference independently predicted fat percent and were also included in the new equations. CONCLUSIONS: The 1974 DW equations did not predict %BF(DXA) uniformly in all races or ethnicities. Using %BF(DXA) as the criterion measure, the original DW skinfold equations have been updated specific to sex and race/ethnicity while maintaining the DW options for a minimalistic model using fewer predictors.
PURPOSE: Despite their widespread use in research and fitness settings, Durnin and Womersley's (DW) 1974 prediction equations using skinfold thickness to estimate body fat percent by hydrodensitometry have not been systematically evaluated in racial or ethnic groups using body fat percent measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (%BF(DXA)) as the standard. METHODS: This cross-sectional, population-based study examined whether the DW skinfold equations predict %BF(DXA) in a large, multiracial sample. Four skinfold measures (biceps, triceps, subscapular, and suprailiac), other clinical anthropometrics, and %BF(DXA) were obtained from 1675 healthy adults, age 18-110 yr, who were classified into four racial or ethnic categories: Caucasian, African American, Hispanic, or Asian. Predicted body fat percent using DW equations was compared with %BF(DXA) and evaluated within race/ethnicity- and sex-specific groups. RESULTS: Mean body fat percent predicted by DW equations was significantly different from %BF(DXA) in four of eight race/ethnicity- and sex-specific groups, particularly in Asian women and African American men (3.3 and 2.4 percentage point overestimates, respectively, P < 0.0001). New linear regression equations were developed estimating %BF(DXA) specific to each race/ethnicity and sex group, using the original DW skinfold sites. Body weight, height, and waist circumference independently predicted fat percent and were also included in the new equations. CONCLUSIONS: The 1974 DW equations did not predict %BF(DXA) uniformly in all races or ethnicities. Using %BF(DXA) as the criterion measure, the original DW skinfold equations have been updated specific to sex and race/ethnicity while maintaining the DW options for a minimalistic model using fewer predictors.
Authors: O Ortiz; M Russell; T L Daley; R N Baumgartner; M Waki; S Lichtman; J Wang; R N Pierson; S B Heymsfield Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 1992-01 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Robyn E Karlage; Carmen L Wilson; Nan Zhang; Sue Kaste; Daniel M Green; Gregory T Armstrong; Leslie L Robison; Wassim Chemaitilly; Deo Kumar Srivastava; Melissa M Hudson; Kirsten K Ness Journal: Cancer Date: 2015-02-27 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Zackary S Cicone; Brett S Nickerson; Youn-Jeng Choi; Clifton J Holmes; Bjoern Hornikel; Michael V Fedewa; Michael R Esco Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2021-12-01 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: David S Freedman; John C Thornton; F Xavier Pi-Sunyer; Steven B Heymsfield; Jack Wang; Richard N Pierson; Heidi M Blanck; Dympna Gallagher Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2012-04-09 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Francesco Lucertini; Marco Gervasi; Giancarlo D'Amen; Davide Sisti; Marco Bruno Luigi Rocchi; Vilberto Stocchi; Piero Benelli Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-09-06 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Roxana Maria Martin-Hadmaș; Ștefan Adrian Martin; Adela Romonți; Cristina Oana Mărginean Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-05-25 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Kelsey H Collins; Behnam Sharif; Raylene A Reimer; Claudia Sanmartin; Walter Herzog; Rick Chin; Deborah A Marshall Journal: BMC Obes Date: 2018-09-03