Zohre Mahmoodi1, Morteza Salarzaei2, Mahboobeh Sheikh3. 1. Department of Cardiology, Zabol University of Medical Sciences, Zabol, Iran. 2. General Physician, Zabol University of Medical Sciences, Zabol, Iran. 3. Department of Cardiology, Zabol University of Medical Sciences, Zabol, Iran. 30biran@gmail.com.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: There is a high risk of mortality and morbidity associated with Vascular Graft Infections (VGI) which requires early diagnosis. The aim of the present systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of 18FDG PET/CT in diagnosing VGI. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines through a search in Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane databases. We evaluated five parameters including specificity, sensitivity, negative and positive predictive values (NPV and PPV), and accuracy. We used STATA/MP 15.0 (StataCorp, College Station, TX) for all of our analyses. RESULTS: Overall 10 studies including 320 patients undergone 18FDG PET/CT were included. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios along with their 95% CI were 0.92 (95% CI 0.88-0.95), 0.76 (95% CI 0.76-0.70), 3.49 (95% CI 3.49-2.32) and 0.14 (95% CI 0.09-0.23), respectively. The diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) for diagnosis of VGI was 37.12 (95% CI 14.84-92.82). The mean cut-off value of the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) for diagnosis of VGI was 5.39 while the overall mean SUVmax among patients with VGI was 8.47. CONCLUSION: According to our results, 18FDG PET/CT is a useful diagnostic method in detecting active VGI with high diagnostic accuracy. Because of its ability to evaluate morphology and main texture using SUVmax, the 18FDG PET/CT provides an objective assessment of aspects and extent of disease activity, which results in preventing unnecessary surgery, proper treatment planning, and evaluating the effectiveness of treatment.
INTRODUCTION: There is a high risk of mortality and morbidity associated with Vascular Graft Infections (VGI) which requires early diagnosis. The aim of the present systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of 18FDG PET/CT in diagnosing VGI. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines through a search in Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane databases. We evaluated five parameters including specificity, sensitivity, negative and positive predictive values (NPV and PPV), and accuracy. We used STATA/MP 15.0 (StataCorp, College Station, TX) for all of our analyses. RESULTS: Overall 10 studies including 320 patients undergone 18FDG PET/CT were included. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios along with their 95% CI were 0.92 (95% CI 0.88-0.95), 0.76 (95% CI 0.76-0.70), 3.49 (95% CI 3.49-2.32) and 0.14 (95% CI 0.09-0.23), respectively. The diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) for diagnosis of VGI was 37.12 (95% CI 14.84-92.82). The mean cut-off value of the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) for diagnosis of VGI was 5.39 while the overall mean SUVmax among patients with VGI was 8.47. CONCLUSION: According to our results, 18FDG PET/CT is a useful diagnostic method in detecting active VGI with high diagnostic accuracy. Because of its ability to evaluate morphology and main texture using SUVmax, the 18FDG PET/CT provides an objective assessment of aspects and extent of disease activity, which results in preventing unnecessary surgery, proper treatment planning, and evaluating the effectiveness of treatment.
Authors: J L M Bruggink; A W J M Glaudemans; B R Saleem; R Meerwaldt; H Alkefaji; T R Prins; R H J A Slart; C J Zeebregts Journal: Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg Date: 2010-06-23 Impact factor: 7.069
Authors: B-R Sah; L Husmann; D Mayer; A Scherrer; Z Rancic; G Puippe; R Weber; B Hasse Journal: Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg Date: 2015-01-31 Impact factor: 7.069
Authors: J W Hallett; D M Marshall; T M Petterson; D T Gray; T C Bower; K J Cherry; P Gloviczki; P C Pairolero Journal: J Vasc Surg Date: 1997-02 Impact factor: 4.268
Authors: Walter R Wilson; Thomas C Bower; Mark A Creager; Sepideh Amin-Hanjani; Patrick T O'Gara; Peter B Lockhart; Rabih O Darouiche; Basel Ramlawi; Colin P Derdeyn; Ann F Bolger; Matthew E Levison; Kathryn A Taubert; Robert S Baltimore; Larry M Baddour Journal: Circulation Date: 2016-10-13 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: O T A Lyons; M Baguneid; T D Barwick; R E Bell; N Foster; S Homer-Vanniasinkam; S Hopkins; A Hussain; K Katsanos; B Modarai; J A T Sandoe; S Thomas; N M Price Journal: Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg Date: 2016-10-19 Impact factor: 7.069