Literature DB >> 34309695

Displaced mid-shaft clavicular fractures: state of the art for athletes and young active people.

Dominique Saragaglia1, Ramsay Refaie2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Fractures ofthe clavicle are frequent injuries (between 4 and 10% of adult fractures) and mid-shaft diaphyseal fractures represent more than 80% of clavicle fractures. In a recent study from the USA in 2019, an incidence of 22.4 fractures per year per 100,000 people was reported. Multiple injury mechanisms are recognised, with sport accounting for 50 to 85% of these injuries. There is little or no consensus as to the optimal treatment but in recent years multiple studies have suggested operative management should be favoured in athletes and young active patients.
OBJECTIVES: These are (1) to present the anatomy and the anatomical-pathology of the fractures of the clavicle as well as the mechanisms of injury, (2), (3) to describe non-operative and operative treatment methods, (4) to review the literature around different treatment modalities and (5) to attempt to describe the best treatment for athletes.
METHODS: To collect and analyse the most recent articles of the literature regarding the management of displaced mid-shaft fractures of the clavicle for athletes and young active people.
RESULTS: Looking at studies of the general population, the results tend to favour surgical treatment with a smaller incidence of non-union and faster return to function. These results are mirrored in the athlete population where several studies have shown excellent anatomic restoration and functional recovery after plate fixation.
CONCLUSION: Based on this analysis, with the exception of patients who refuse operative management after an informed discussion, the treatment of choice in displaced clavicle fractures in athletes seems to be operative treatment with a plate and screws. However, prospective randomised studies comparing non-surgical treatment and plate osteosynthesis are missing and it is not possible to state that the latter is the best treatment.
© 2021. SICOT aisbl.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clavicle; Fracture; Non-operative treatment; Return to sport; Surgical treatment

Year:  2021        PMID: 34309695     DOI: 10.1007/s00264-021-05113-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  37 in total

Review 1.  Clavicle fractures.

Authors:  M Ropars; H Thomazeau; D Huten
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2016-12-30       Impact factor: 2.256

2.  Fractures of the distal third of the clavicle.

Authors:  C S Neer
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1968 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Screw-plate fixation for displaced middle-third clavicular fractures with three or more fragments: A report of 172 cases.

Authors:  Dominique Saragaglia; Guillaume Cavalié; Brice Rubens-Duval; Régis Pailhé; Gabriel Lateur
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 2.256

4.  Long-term functional outcome assessment of plate fixation and autogenous bone grafting for clavicular non-union.

Authors:  Damien O'Connor; Satish Kutty; John P McCabe
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.586

5.  Surgical management of midshaft clavicle nonunions is associated with a higher rate of short-term complications compared with acute fractures.

Authors:  Braden McKnight; Nathanael Heckmann; J Ryan Hill; William C Pannell; Amir Mostofi; Reza Omid; George F Rick Hatch
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 3.019

6.  Fractures of the clavicle in the adult. Epidemiology and classification.

Authors:  C M Robinson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1998-05

7.  Comparison of simple arm sling and figure of eight clavicular bandage for midshaft clavicular fractures: a randomised controlled study.

Authors:  A Ersen; A C Atalar; F Birisik; Y Saglam; M Demirhan
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 5.082

Review 8.  Management of Midshaft Clavicle Fractures in Adults.

Authors:  Brent Wiesel; Sameer Nagda; Samir Mehta; Ryan Churchill
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 3.020

9.  Incidence and mechanism of injury of clavicle fractures in the NEISS database: Athletic and non athletic injuries.

Authors:  Steven F DeFroda; Nicholas Lemme; Justin Kleiner; Joseph Gil; Brett D Owens
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2019-01-26

10.  Epidemiology of Clavicle Fractures Among US High School Athletes, 2008-2009 Through 2016-2017.

Authors:  Meagan M McCarthy; Jonathan H Bihl; Rachel M Frank; Hytham S Salem; Eric C McCarty; R Dawn Comstock
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2019-07-26
View more
  1 in total

1.  The German version of the Nottingham Clavicle Score is a reliable and valid patient-reported outcome measure to evaluate patients with clavicle and acromioclavicular pathologies.

Authors:  Sebastian Scheidt; Jakob Zapatka; Richard Julius Freytag; Malin Sarah Pohlentz; Matteo Paci; Koroush Kabir; Christof Burger; Davide Cucchi
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2022-08-29       Impact factor: 4.114

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.