| Literature DB >> 34309633 |
H Manisha Yapa1,2, Hae-Young Kim2,3, Kathy Petoumenos1, Frank A Post4, Awachana Jiamsakul1, Jan-Walter De Neve5, Frank Tanser2,6,7,8, Collins Iwuji2,9, Kathy Baisley2,10, Maryam Shahmanesh2,11, Deenan Pillay2,12, Mark J Siedner2,6,13, Till Bärnighausen2,5,11,14, Jacob Bor2,15,16.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: South Africa implemented universal test and treat (UTT) in September 2016 in an effort to encourage earlier initiation of antiretroviral therapy (ART).Entities:
Keywords: CD4; HIV/AIDS; antiretroviral therapy initiation; universal test and treat (UTT)
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 34309633 PMCID: PMC9049265 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciab650
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Infect Dis ISSN: 1058-4838 Impact factor: 20.999
Figure 1.Participant flow diagram for inclusion in regression models. Abbreviation: ART, antiretroviral therapy.
Figure 2.CD4 categories overall (A) and by sex,women (B) and men (C).
Figure 3.Time trends in proportion of individuals without a within-window CD4 count recorded. Dashed vertical lines depict policy change: January 2015, CD4 eligibility cutoff ≤500 cells/μL for adults or Option B+ for pregnant/breastfeeding women (Option B+ era); September 2016, Universal Test and Treat. Abbreviation: ART, antiretroviral therapy.
Figure 4.CD4 count at ART initiation among women and men. Dashed vertical lines depict policy change: January 2015, CD4 eligibility cutoff ≤500 cells/μL for adults or Option B+ for pregnant/breastfeeding women (Option B+ era); September 2016, Universal Test and Treat. Abbreviation: ART, antiretroviral therapy.
Interrupted Time Series Regression: Mean CD4 Count at Antiretroviral Therapy Initiation by Time Period
| Model parameter | Pre-Option B+ (July 2014–December 2014) | Option B+ Implementation (January 2015–December 2015) | Pre-UTT (January 2016–August 2016) | UTT Implementation (September 2016–August 2017) | Post-UTT (September 2017–March 2019) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coefficient (95% CI) | Coefficient (95% CI) | Coefficient (95% CI) | Coefficient (95% CI) | Coefficient (95% CI) | |
| Underlying time trend | –1.5 (–7.8 to 4.9) | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Level change | N/A | 52.7 (30.9 to 74.5) | N/A | 124.2 (102.2 to 146.1) | N/A |
| Trend change | N/A | –1.7 (–8.3 to 4.8) | 6.3 (2.6 to 10.0) | –8.7 (–11.9 to –5.5) | 6.6 (3.9 to 9.3) |
| Absolute trend | –1.5 (–7.8 to 4.9) | –3.2 (–4.7 to –1.7) | 3.1 (0.5 to 5.7) | –5.6 (–7.5 to –3.8) | 1.0 (–0.3 to 2.2) |
The regression model included inverse probability weights for availability of a within-window CD4 count, and a covariate for sex.
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; N/A, not applicable; UTT, universal test and treat.
a The underlying time trend refers to the “baseline” trend of CD4 count at antiretroviral therapy (ART) initiation in the analysis. Based on our models, this refers to the time trend in CD4 count at ART initiation during the pre-option B+ period. Subsequent “absolute” time trends for each study period are calculated from this baseline, drawing on the modeled trend changes as described below.
bLevel changes were modeled at immediate policy change (option B+ policy change and UTT policy change) but not at 12 months after implementation of the policy.
cEach trend change is the change in trend relative to the (absolute) trend in the time period immediately preceding it. Therefore, the trend change for option B+ implementation relative to the pre-Option B+ trend is –1.7 cells/µL, and the trend change in pre-UTT relative to Option B+ implementation is +6.3 cells/µL.
dAbsolute trends were calculated using regression post-estimation commands (lincom in Stata). For example, the absolute trend for Option B+ implementation = pre-Option B+ time trend plus Option B+ implementation trend change; the absolute trend for pre-UTT = pre-Option B+ time trend plus Option B+ implementation trend change plus pre-UTT trend change.