Literature DB >> 10994804

The "Hawthorne effect"--what did the original Hawthorne studies actually show?

G Wickström1, T Bendix.   

Abstract

The "Hawthorne effect" is often mentioned as a possible explanation for positive results in intervention studies. It is used to cover many phenomena, not only unwitting confounding of variables under study by the study itself, but also behavioral change due to an awareness of being observed, active compliance with the supposed wishes of researchers because of special attention received, or positive response to the stimulus being introduced. At times, the term seems to be used as a social equivalent to "placebo effect". In social research, there is much critical literature indicating that, in general, the term "Hawthorne effect" should be avoided. Instead of referring to the ambiguous and disputable Hawthorne effect when evaluating intervention effectiveness, researchers should introduce specific psychological and social variables that may have affected the outcome under study but were not monitored during the project, along with the possible effect on the observed results.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10994804

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health        ISSN: 0355-3140            Impact factor:   5.024


  111 in total

1.  Criterion-related validity of a diarrhea questionnaire in HIV-infected patients.

Authors:  Nathan M Thielman; Philip F Rust; Richard L Guerrant
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Bias.

Authors:  Miguel Delgado-Rodríguez; Javier Llorca
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.710

3.  LASIK in children?

Authors:  P Lempert
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  Effects of green buildings on employee health and productivity.

Authors:  Amanjeet Singh; Matt Syal; Sue C Grady; Sinem Korkmaz
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2010-07-15       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 5.  Concordance of adherence measurement using self-reported adherence questionnaires and medication monitoring devices.

Authors:  Lizheng Shi; Jinan Liu; Yordanka Koleva; Vivian Fonseca; Anupama Kalsekar; Manjiri Pawaskar
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  Answering physicians' clinical questions: obstacles and potential solutions.

Authors:  John W Ely; Jerome A Osheroff; M Lee Chambliss; Mark H Ebell; Marcy E Rosenbaum
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2004-11-23       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 7.  Conceptual knowledge acquisition in biomedicine: A methodological review.

Authors:  Philip R O Payne; Eneida A Mendonça; Stephen B Johnson; Justin B Starren
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2007-03-27       Impact factor: 6.317

8.  Combined strength and endurance training in competitive swimmers.

Authors:  Stian Aspenes; Per-Ludvik Kjendlie; Jan Hoff; Jan Helgerud
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 2.988

9.  Barriers and facilitators to the use of computer-based intensive insulin therapy.

Authors:  Thomas R Campion; Lemuel R Waitman; Nancy M Lorenzi; Addison K May; Cynthia S Gadd
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 4.046

10.  Randomised controlled trial of the effects of physical activity feedback on awareness and behaviour in UK adults: the FAB study protocol [ISRCTN92551397].

Authors:  Clare Watkinson; Esther M F van Sluijs; Stephen Sutton; Theresa Marteau; Simon J Griffin
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.