Literature DB >> 34308589

[Comparison of early effectiveness of arthroscopic suture bridge technique and conventional double tunnel suture technique in treatment of avulsion fracture of posterior cruciate ligament insertion].

Shichun Wu1, Weihua Xu1, Wenxiang Lin1, Honghan Li1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the early effectiveness of arthroscopic suture bridge technique and conventional double tunnel suture technique in the treatment of avulsion fracture of posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) insertion.
METHODS: Between June 2013 and December 2018, 62 patients with tibial avulsion fracture of PCL insertion that met the criteria were selected and randomly divided into trial group (using arthroscopic suture bridge technique) and control group (using conventional double tunnel suture technique), 31 cases in each group. There was no significant difference in gender, age, injured side, cause of injury, time from injury to operation, Meyers & McKeever classification, Kellgren-Lawrence classification, and preoperative knee range of motion, difference of posterior relaxation of bilateral knee joints, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, and Lysholm score between the two groups ( P>0.05). The operation time and IKDC score, Lysholm score, knee range of motion, the difference of posterior relaxation of bilateral knee joints (measured by KT-2000 under knee flexion of 90° and 30 lbs) were recorded and compared between the two groups before operation and at 3 and 12 months after operation.
RESULTS: Both groups successfully completed the operation, and the operation time of the trial group and the control group were (61.81±6.83) minutes and (80.42±4.22) minutes respectively, showing significant difference between the two groups ( t=12.911, P=0.000). All the incisions healed by first intention, and there was no wound infection and other early postoperative related complications. All patients were followed up 13-18 months (mean, 14.6 months). The fractures in both groups healed at 3 months after operation. No knee pain, limited movement, or other complications occurred. At 3 and 12 months after operation, the IKDC score, Lysholm score, knee range of motion, and the difference of posterior relaxation of bilateral knee joints in both groups were significantly improved when compared with preoperative ones, and further improved at 12 months after operation when compared with at 3 months after operation ( P<0.05). At each time point after operation, the above indexes and the grade of the difference of posterior relaxation of bilateral knee joints in the trial group were significantly better than those in the control group ( P<0.05).
CONCLUSION: Arthroscopic suture bridge technique in the treatment avulsion fracture of PCL insertion is simple and reliable, which can significantly improve the function and stability of the knee joint and obtain satisfactory early effectiveness.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arthroscopy; avulsion fracture of posterior cruciate ligament insertion; suture bridge technique; suture technique

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34308589      PMCID: PMC8311220          DOI: 10.7507/1002-1892.202102080

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi        ISSN: 1002-1892


  13 in total

1.  Proximity of the posterior cruciate ligament insertion to the popliteal artery as a function of the knee flexion angle: implications for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  M J Matava; N S Sethi; W G Totty
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.772

2.  Fixation with anchors for posterior cruciate ligament avulsion by arthroscopy: a new technique.

Authors:  Felipe Camara-Arrigunaga; Pedro Camposeco-Longo; Jorge Nieves-Silva; Michele D'Apuzzo
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.772

3.  Arthroscopic 4-point suture fixation of anterior cruciate ligament tibial avulsion fractures.

Authors:  Achilleas Boutsiadis; Dimitrios Karataglis; Filon Agathangelidis; Konstantinos Ditsios; Pericles Papadopoulos
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2014-11-24

4.  Arthroscopic Treatment of Greater Tuberosity Avulsion Fractures.

Authors:  Jonathan A Godin; J Christoph Katthagen; Erik M Fritz; Jonas Pogorzelski; Peter J Millett
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2017-06-12

5.  Arthroscopic Fixation of Tibial Eminence Fractures: A Biomechanical Comparative Study of Screw, Suture, and Suture Anchor.

Authors:  Ji Li; Yang Yu; Chunhui Liu; Xiangzheng Su; Weixiong Liao; Zhongli Li
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 4.772

6.  Biomechanical comparison of different fixation techniques for reconstruction of tibial avulsion fractures of the anterior cruciate ligament.

Authors:  Marco Ezechieli; Madeline Schäfer; Christoph Becher; Antonios Dratzidis; Richard Glaab; Christian Ryf; Christof Hurschler; Max Ettinger
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-03-02       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Biomechanical Properties of Different Fixation Techniques for Posterior Cruciate Ligament Avulsion Fractures.

Authors:  Christoph Domnick; Clemens Kösters; Friederike Franke; Michael J Raschke; Wolf Petersen; Christian Fink; Mirco Herbort
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 4.772

8.  Suture Bridge Fixation Technique for Posterior Cruciate Ligament Avulsion Fracture.

Authors:  Kwang Won Lee; Dae Suk Yang; Gyu Sang Lee; Won Sik Choy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2015-11-13

9.  Arthroscopic Reduction and Internal Fixation of Posterior Cruciate Ligament Avulsion Fracture Using an Adjustable-Length Loop Device.

Authors:  Ryuichiro Akagi; Yuta Muramatsu; Shunsuke Mukoyama; Hiroshi Sugiyama; Satoshi Yamaguchi; Seiji Ohtori; Takahisa Sasho
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2020-12-21

10.  Treatment of tibia avulsion fracture of posterior cruciate ligament with high-strength suture fixation under arthroscopy.

Authors:  W Zhu; W Lu; J Cui; L Peng; Y Ou; H Li; H Liu; W You; D Wang; Y Zeng
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 3.693

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.