PURPOSE: The most common fixation techniques for tibial avulsion fractures of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) described in the literature are screw and suture fixation. The fixation of these fractures with the TightRope® device might be an alternative. Up to now it has been commonly used in other injuries, such as acromioclavicular joint or syndesmosis ruptures. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical properties of different fixation techniques for the reconstruction of tibial avulsion fractures. METHODS:Type III tibial avulsion fractures were simulated in 40 porcine knees. Each specimen was randomly assigned to one of four groups: (1) anterograde screw fixation, (2) suture fixation, (3) TightRope® fixation or (4) control group. The initial displacement, strength to failure and the failure mode were documented. RESULTS: The maximum load to failure was 1,345 ± 155.5 N for the control group, 402.5 ± 117.6 N for the TightRope® group, 367 ±115.8 N for the suture group and 311.7 ± 120.3 N for the screw group. The maximum load to failure of the control group was significantly larger compared to all other groups. The initial dislocation was 0.28 ± 0.09 mm for the control group, 0.55 ± 0.26 mm for the TightRope® group, 0.84 ± 0.15 mm for the screw group and 1.14 ± 0.9 mm for the suture group. The initial dislocation was significantly larger for the suture group compared to the TightRope® and control groups. CONCLUSIONS: The TightRope® fixation shows significantly lower initial displacement compared to the suture group. The TightRope® fixation might be an alternative for the repair of ACL tibial avulsion fractures that can be used arthroscopically.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: The most common fixation techniques for tibial avulsion fractures of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) described in the literature are screw and suture fixation. The fixation of these fractures with the TightRope® device might be an alternative. Up to now it has been commonly used in other injuries, such as acromioclavicular joint or syndesmosis ruptures. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical properties of different fixation techniques for the reconstruction of tibial avulsion fractures. METHODS: Type III tibial avulsion fractures were simulated in 40 porcine knees. Each specimen was randomly assigned to one of four groups: (1) anterograde screw fixation, (2) suture fixation, (3) TightRope® fixation or (4) control group. The initial displacement, strength to failure and the failure mode were documented. RESULTS: The maximum load to failure was 1,345 ± 155.5 N for the control group, 402.5 ± 117.6 N for the TightRope® group, 367 ± 115.8 N for the suture group and 311.7 ± 120.3 N for the screw group. The maximum load to failure of the control group was significantly larger compared to all other groups. The initial dislocation was 0.28 ± 0.09 mm for the control group, 0.55 ± 0.26 mm for the TightRope® group, 0.84 ± 0.15 mm for the screw group and 1.14 ± 0.9 mm for the suture group. The initial dislocation was significantly larger for the suture group compared to the TightRope® and control groups. CONCLUSIONS: The TightRope® fixation shows significantly lower initial displacement compared to the suture group. The TightRope® fixation might be an alternative for the repair of ACL tibial avulsion fractures that can be used arthroscopically.
Authors: Janne T Nurmi; Harri Sievänen; Pekka Kannus; Markku Järvinen; Teppo L N Järvinen Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2004 Apr-May Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Anne Kathleen Eggers; Christoph Becker; Andre Weimann; Mirco Herbort; Thore Zantop; Michael J Raschke; Wolf Petersen Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2006-12-14 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Matthew R Bong; Anthony Romero; Erik Kubiak; Kazuho Iesaka; Christian S Heywood; Fredrick Kummer; Jeffrey Rosen; Laith Jazrawi Journal: Arthroscopy Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 4.772
Authors: Kenneth D Montgomery; John Cavanaugh; Steven Cohen; Thomas L Wickiewicz; Russell F Warren; Field Blevens Journal: Arthroscopy Date: 2002-02 Impact factor: 4.772
Authors: Tran Trung Dung; Hoang Gia Du; Nguyen Hoang Long; Le Manh Son; Dao Xuan Thanh; Dinh Ngoc Son; Nguyen Trung Tuyen; Do Van Minh; Nguyen Huy Phương; Vu Tu Nam; Pham Trung Hieu; Ma Ngoc Thanh Journal: Ann Med Surg (Lond) Date: 2019-07-08
Authors: Faizah Safina Bakrin; Mohd Makmor-Bakry; Wan Hazmy Che Hon; Shafeeq Mohd Faizal; Mohamed Mansor Manan; Long Chiau Ming Journal: Pharmacy (Basel) Date: 2020-12-08