| Literature DB >> 34307660 |
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the voids in root canal treatment of deciduous molar canals using three obturating materials and two obturation systems using micro-CT. Study Design. Thirty freshly extracted deciduous molars were used in this study. The specimens were instrumented using a ProTaper Universal rotary instrument and randomly assigned into six groups (n = 5). Mesiobuccal root canals were obturated using Ca(OH)2 and iodoform-Ca(OH)2 and ZOE cement. The materials were applied straight from the syringe up to the 2 mm coronal level of the apex. Subsequently, the Lentulo spiral and ultrasonic activation with endoactivator were used for obturation. All samples were scanned by micro-CT with 9.1 μm isotropic voxel resolution. The voids in cross-sectional images and 3D volumes of voids were measured. Differences among materials were statically evaluated (p < 0.05).Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34307660 PMCID: PMC8272653 DOI: 10.1155/2021/6567161
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Figure 1Axial micro-CT images showing (a) obturated mesiobuccal canal, (b) ROI for measurements, (c) binary registration scale for canals, and (d) white pixels in the canal showing void (arrow).
Figure 2(a) 3D representation of the root canal obturation with voids. (b) 3D representation showing the root and canal obturation. (c) Image showing voids in white color. (d) Axial image showing voids to canal wall (arrow).
Table showing the mean percentage (standard deviation) of the obturation percentage of the root canal in 2D slices. Bold numbers show statistical significance.
| Groups |
| Mean (range) | SD | Statistical test | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pairwise comparison |
| ||||
| Group I | 5 | 83% (26.3-100) | ±0.6 | 1-4 |
|
| 1-6 | |||||
|
| |||||
| Group II | 5 | 86% (29.2-100) | ±0.5 | 2-4 |
|
| 2-6 | |||||
|
| |||||
| Group III | 5 | 88% (24.7-100) | ±0.3 | 3-4 |
|
| 3-6 | |||||
|
| |||||
| Group IV | 5 | 94% (25.5-100) | ±0.4 | 1-4 |
∗
|
| 2-4 | |||||
| 3-4 | |||||
| 4-5 | |||||
|
| |||||
| Group V | 5 | 89% (24.3-100) | ±0.5 | 5-4 |
|
|
| |||||
| Group VI | 5 | 94% (28.7-100) | ±0.3 | 1-6 |
∗
|
| 2-6 | |||||
| 3-6 | |||||
| 5-6 | |||||
Mean volume (standard deviation) of voids of the root canal obturation materials in 3D volumes. Bold numbers show statistical significance.
| Groups |
| Mean (range) (mm3) | SD | Statistical test | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pairwise comparison |
| ||||
| Group I | 5 | 3.116 | ±0.125 | 1-4 |
|
| 1-6 | |||||
|
| |||||
| Group II | 5 | 2.725 | ±0.145 | 2-4 |
|
| 2-6 | |||||
|
| |||||
| Group III | 5 | 2.618 | ±0.214 | 3-4 |
|
| 3-6 | |||||
|
| |||||
| Group IV | 5 | 2.217 | ±0.195 | 1-4 |
∗
|
| 2-4 | |||||
| 3-4 | |||||
| 4-5 | |||||
|
| |||||
| Group V | 5 | 2.415 | ±0.218 | 5-4 |
|
|
| |||||
| Group VI | 5 | 2.223 | ±0.174 | 1-6 |
∗
|
| 2-6 | |||||
| 3-6 | |||||
| 5-6 | |||||