| Literature DB >> 34307190 |
Xiao-Feng Ruan1,2, Ying-Xuan Zhang1, Si Chen1, Xiao-Rong Liu1, Fang-Fang Zhu1, Yan-Xi Huang3, Xiao-Jing Liu3, Song-Ping Luo3, Gao-Pi Deng3, Jie Gao3.
Abstract
The features of the vaginal microbiota (VM) community can reflect health status, and they could become new biomarkers for disease diagnosis. During pregnancy, domination of bacteria of the genus Lactobacillus in the VM community is regarded as a keystone because they stabilize the VM by producing antimicrobial compounds and competing adhesion. An altered VM composition provides a marker for adverse pregnancy outcomes. This nested case-control study aimed to characterize the VM in women with a tubal pregnancy (TP) presenting with pain and/or uterine bleeding in early pregnancy. Chinese women with a symptomatic early pregnancy of unknown location were the study cohort. 16S rDNA gene-sequencing of V3-V4 variable regions was done to assess the diversity, structures, taxonomic biomarkers, and classification of the VM community. The primary outcome was the location of the early pregnancy. The VM community in women with a TP showed higher diversity (PD-whole-tree, median: 8.26 vs. 7.08, P = 0.047; Shannon Diversity Index, median: 1.43 vs 0.99, P = 0.03) and showed different structures to those in women with an intrauterine pregnancy (IUP) (R = 0.23, P < 0.01). Bacteria of the genus Lactobacillus were significantly enriched in the IUP group, whereas bacteria of the genera Gardnerella and Prevotella were significantly enriched in the TP group. Lactobacillus abundance could be used to classify the pregnancy location (AUC = 0.81). Non-Lactobacillus-dominated microbiota (≤ 0.85% Lactobacillus) was significantly associated with a TP (adjusted odds ratio: 4.42, 95% confidence interval: 1.33 to 14.71, P = 0.02). In conclusion, among women with a symptomatic early pregnancy, a higher diversity and lower abundance of Lactobacillus in the VM is associated with a TP.Entities:
Keywords: Lactobacillus; non-Lactobacillus dominated microbiota; symptomatic early pregnancy; tubal pregnancy; vaginal microbiota
Year: 2021 PMID: 34307190 PMCID: PMC8294389 DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.659505
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cell Infect Microbiol ISSN: 2235-2988 Impact factor: 5.293
Figure 1Flowchart of the study.
Characteristics of subjects with tubal pregnancy compared with those with intrauterine pregnancy.
| Tubal pregnancy | Intrauterine pregnancy |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subjects | 32 | 63 | – |
| Gestational age, days | 46.4 ± 6.9 | 48.0 ± 8.0 | 0.34 |
| Age, years | 30.1 ± 5.7 | 29.4 ± 5.4 | 0.56 |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 22.0 ± 3.4 | 21.1 ± 2.8 | 0.15 |
| Current smoker, yes | 0 | 0 | – |
| Uterine bleeding, yes | 26 (81.2%) | 38 (60.3%) | 0.04* |
| Abdominal pain, yes | 27 (84.4%) | 42 (66.7%) | 0.07 |
| Menstrual cycle, days | 29.6 ± 3.8 | 34.9 ± 10.2 | <0.01* |
| Gravidity | 3.0 (1.0-4.0) | 2.0 (2.0-3.0) | 0.41 |
| Previous spontaneous abortion, yes | 9 (28.1%) | 29 (46.0%) | 0.09 |
| Previous ectopic pregnancy, yes | 6 (18.8%) | 3 (4.8%) | 0.03* |
| Previous infertility, yes | 6 (18.8%) | 14 (22.2%) | 0.70 |
| Previous pelvic inflammatory disease, yes | 17 (53.1%) | 10 (15.9%) | <0.01* |
| Previous uterine cavity surgery, yes | 18 (56.2%) | 41 (65.1%) | 0.40 |
| Previous tubal surgery, yes | 6 (18.8%) | 4 (6.3%) | 0.06 |
| Previous pelvic surgery, yes | 12 (37.5%) | 21 (33.3%) | 0.70 |
| Vaginal environments | |||
| Vaginal pH | 4.7 ± 0.4 | 4.5 ± 0.3 | <0.01* |
| non- | 18 (56.2%) | 8 (12.7%) | <0.01* |
Continuous variables were presented as mean ± SD, categorical variables were expressed as percentages (%). P was calculated by t test for normally distributed continuous variables, chi-squared test, or Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables.
BMI body mass index.
*P < 0.05
Figure 2Diversity measures in subjects with intrauterine pregnancy and with tubal pregnancy. (A) Alpha diversity represented by PD-whole-tree and Shannon diversity index in subjects with intrauterine pregnancy and with tubal pregnancy. Boxes with inside line represented interquartile range (IQR) and median, whiskers represented values within 1.5 × IQR of the first and third quartiles, points represented individual subjects. P was calculated by Wilcoxon test. (B) Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) based on weighted UniFrac distances between the subjects with intrauterine pregnancy and with tubal pregnancy. Points represented individual subjects, and ellipses represented 95% confidence intervals around the cluster centroid. ANOSIM calculated R and P to determine the significance of clustering. Red indicated intrauterine pregnancy and blue indicated tubal pregnancy.
Figure 3Vaginal microbial composition in subjects with intrauterine pregnancy and with tubal pregnancy. (A) Phylum level; (B) Genus level; (C) Species level composition in subjects with intrauterine pregnancy and with tubal pregnancy. Bar charts showing the vaginal microbial taxa composition in mean values (on the right side) and individual subjects with intrauterine pregnancy and with tubal pregnancy (on the left side).
Figure 4The establishment of Lactobacillus dominated microbiota (LDM) and non-Lactobacillus dominated microbiota (NLDM). (A) Cladogram and scores identified by linear discriminant analysis (LDA) using LEfSe. The nodes of cladogram from the inner to the outer circles indicated the abundant taxa from the kingdom (D0) to the species (D6) level. Colors represented the groups in which differentially abundant taxa were enriched (red indicated intrauterine pregnancy, blue indicated tubal pregnancy, yellow indicated non-significant), and the diameter of each node was proportional to the taxon’s abundance. The threshold on the logarithmic LDA score was 4.0. (B) Receiver operating characteristic curves for five trials of cross-validated CART of Lactobacillu, Gardnerella, and Prevotella. Black curve indicated the average ROC of the five trials (grey curves). The diagonal lines mark an area under the receiver operating characteristic curves of 0.5. (C) Heatmap of log10-transformed proportions of vaginal microbial taxa composition of 95 subjects clustered by pregnancy location and vaginal microbiota. The lower bar showed the pregnancy location of each subject (red indicated intrauterine pregnancy, blue indicated tubal pregnancy), while the upper bar showed vaginal microbiota (green indicated non-Lactobacillus dominated microbiota, orange indicated Lactobacillus dominated microbiota). The histogram showed the taxon log10% relative abundance (darkest red indicated greatest abundance; light red and yellow indicated relatively less abundance; and green indicated low abundance or not present). Fourteen of the most abundant genera were showed.
Multivariate logistic regression analysis for the relationship between non-Lactobacillus dominated microbiota and tubal pregnancy.
| LDM | Crude Model | Minimally adjusted model | Fully adjusted model |
|---|---|---|---|
| OR, 95% CI, | OR, 95% CI, | OR, 95% CI, | |
| Ref | Ref | Ref | |
| NLDM | 8.84 (3.19, 24.48) <0.01 | 9.46 (3.31, 27.02) <0.01 | 4.42 (1.33, 14.71) 0.02 |
Crude Model adjusted for: None.
Minimally adjusted model adjusted for: BMI.
Fully adjusted model adjusted for: BMI, abdominal pain, vaginal pH, menstrual cycle, gravidity, previous spontaneous abortion, previous infertility, and previous uterine cavity surgery.
BMI, body mass index.