Literature DB >> 34306558

Hallux valgus with and without metatarsalgia in women: a matched-cohort study of plantar pressure measurements.

Carmen Verdu Roman1, Enrique Martinez Gimenez1, David Bustamante Suarez de Puga1, Jesus Mas Martinez1, Manuel Morales Santias1, Javier Sanz-Reig1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Few previous studies focused on plantar loading patterns in HV patients with metatarsalgia. Are there any differences in plantar pressure measurements in women with HV with and without metatarsalgia?
METHODS: A prospective matched-cohort study was designed to analyze plantar pressure measurements in women with HV with and without metatarsalgia from January 2017 to December 2019. The inclusion criteria were age over 18 years old, women, diagnosis of HV with metatarsalgia. Control group had the same inclusion criteria, except metatarsalgia. Patient-reported outcomes scores included American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society Score (AOFAS), and Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Radiographic data were obtained according to the guidelines of the AOFAS Committee on Angular Measurements. Plantar pressure measurements were performed using a platform.
RESULTS: Forty-seven patients met the inclusion criteria. An age-, BMI-, and hallux valgus angle-matched cohort of 47 patients were also selected. There were no statistically significant differences in demographic data and radiographic assessment. HV with metatarsalgia group showed greater values in peak and mean force, peak and mean pressure, and pressure-time integral under toes and metatarsal heads. These differences reached statistically significant in mean force (p = 0.009) and peak force (p = 0.003) under T1; mean pressure (p = 0.01) and peak pressure (p = 0.04) under T1; and mean force (p = 0.003) under MH1. The binary logistic regression analysis showed mean force under T1 as the most associated plantar pressure measurement with the presence of metatarsalgia. C-statistic was 0.66. Mean force > 35 N had a 70% of sensitivity and a 57% of specificity as a cut-off value for the presence of metatarsalgia.
CONCLUSION: HV patients with metatarsalgia had greater values in plantar pressure measurements. Mean force under T1 could be used as a plantar pressure measurement to predict metatarsalgia. © Indian Orthopaedics Association 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hallux valgus; Metatarsalgia; Plantar pressure; Women

Year:  2021        PMID: 34306558      PMCID: PMC8275713          DOI: 10.1007/s43465-021-00416-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Orthop        ISSN: 0019-5413            Impact factor:   1.251


  31 in total

1.  Plantar pressures determinants in mild Hallux Valgus.

Authors:  Alfonso Martínez-Nova; Raquel Sánchez-Rodríguez; Pedro Pérez-Soriano; Salvador Llana-Belloch; Alejo Leal-Muro; Juan Diego Pedrera-Zamorano
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.840

2.  The characteristics and clinical significance of plantar pressure distribution in patients with diabetic toe deformity: a dynamic plantar pressure analysis.

Authors:  X Yu; G-R Yu; Y-X Chen; X-C Liu
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.671

3.  Observations on hallux valgus; based on a controlled series.

Authors:  R H HARDY; J C R CLAPHAM
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1951-08

Review 4.  Current concept review: metatarsalgia.

Authors:  Norman Espinosa; Ernesto Maceira; Mark S Myerson
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.827

5.  Metatarsalgia in hallux valgus deformity: a pedographic analysis.

Authors:  Ute Waldecker
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Surg       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.286

Review 6.  A review of the utilization of baropodometry in postural assessment.

Authors:  José Luís Pimentel Rosário
Journal:  J Bodyw Mov Ther       Date:  2013-07-01

Review 7.  Hallux valgus assessment: report of research committee of American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society.

Authors:  R W Smith; J C Reynolds; M J Stewart
Journal:  Foot Ankle       Date:  1984 Sep-Oct

8.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

Authors:  J A Hanley; B J McNeil
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Reproducibility of plantar pressure measurements in patients with chronic arthritis: a comparison of one-step, two-step, and three-step protocols and an estimate of the number of measurements required.

Authors:  Marike van der Leeden; Jos H M Dekker; Petra C Siemonsma; Sandy S Lek-Westerhof; Martijn P M Steultjens
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.827

10.  Hallux valgus and plantar pressure loading: the Framingham foot study.

Authors:  Andrew M Galica; Thomas J Hagedorn; Alyssa B Dufour; Jody L Riskowski; Howard J Hillstrom; Virginia A Casey; Marian T Hannan
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2013-10-20       Impact factor: 2.303

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.