Literature DB >> 34306549

MRI-Based Morphometric Study Regarding Operative Windows of Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Indian Population.

Rahul Kaul1, Khemendra Kumar2, Madhan Jeyaraman1, Bharat Goswami1, Milind Chandra Choudhary1, H S Chhabra3, Sudhir Kumar1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The novel Oblique lumbar interbody fusion [OLIF] technique has been proposed as a solution to approach related complications of anterior lumbar interbody fusion [ALIF] and lateral lumbar interbody fusion [LLIF]. There exists no study concerning morphological evaluation of retroperitoneal oblique corridor for the Oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) technique in the Indian population. The aim of our study was (a) to measure magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) based anatomic parameters concerning OLIF operative windows from L2-L3 to L4-L5 level (b) to determine the feasibility of this technique following MRI-based morphometric evaluation in the Indian population.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: We did retrospective MRI analysis of 307 consecutive patients following our exclusion criteria. Bare window, psoas major window and psoas major width were measured from axial T2 MRI image taken at mid disc level from L2-L3 to L4-L5 levels.
RESULTS: The mean bare window size was largest at L2-L3 (1.39 cm) level followed by L3-L4 and L4-L5 level (1.28 and 0.62 cm respectively), and differences between them were statistically significant (P < 0.001). Females had statistically significant larger bare windows at L2-L3 and L3-L4 level than males (P < 0.001). With increasing age, there was a significant increase in bare window size at each level (P < 0.001). The mean psoas major window (PMO) and mean psoas major width (PMI) were largest at L4-L5 level (PMO = 1.27 cm, PMI = 3.61 cm) followed by L3-L4 and L2-L3 level (L3-L4: PMO = 1.19 cm, PMI = 2.36 cm; L2-L3: PMO = 0.88 cm, PMI = 1.39 cm), and differences among each level concerning both parameters were statistically significant (P < 0.001). Both parameters (PMO, PMI) were significantly larger in males than females at each level (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: The OLIF technique is well suited for lumbar interbody fusion at L2 -L3 and L3-L4 level in the Indian population irrespective of age and sex. At L4-L5 level, overall 17.9 percent of the study population were unsuitable for this technique due to inaccessible bare window. In our opinion, this level may be better suited for OLIF approach in the elderly Indian population, especially for surgeons who are beginning to attempt this technique in their surgical practice. Preoperative MRI evaluation for the OLIF is important to assess its feasibility, as there exists significant age and gender differences in the Indian population for anatomic parameters concerning OLIF operative windows from L2-L3 to L4-L5 levels. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43465-021-00393-7. © Indian Orthopaedics Association 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Indian population; Interbody fusion; Magnetic resonance imaging; OLIF

Year:  2021        PMID: 34306549      PMCID: PMC8275717          DOI: 10.1007/s43465-021-00393-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Orthop        ISSN: 0019-5413            Impact factor:   1.251


  21 in total

1.  An anatomic study of the lumbar plexus with respect to retroperitoneal endoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Takatomo Moro; Shin-ichi Kikuchi; Shin-ichi Konno; Hiroyuki Yaginuma
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Lower dorsal and lumbar pedicle morphometry in Indian population: a study of four hundred fifty vertebrae.

Authors:  Shankar Acharya; Tsewang Dorje; Abhishek Srivastava
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2010-05-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Retroperitoneal oblique corridor to the L2-S1 intervertebral discs: an MRI study.

Authors:  Diana M Molinares; Timothy T Davis; Daniel A Fung
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2015-10-09

Review 4.  Lateral and Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion-Current Concepts and a Review of Recent Literature.

Authors:  Raymond Hah; H Paco Kang
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2019-06-22

5.  Retroperitoneal oblique corridor to the L2-S1 intervertebral discs in the lateral position: an anatomic study.

Authors:  Timothy T Davis; Richard A Hynes; Daniel A Fung; Scott W Spann; Michael MacMillan; Brian Kwon; John Liu; Frank Acosta; Thomas E Drochner
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2014-09-12

6.  Does right lateral decubitus position change retroperitoneal oblique corridor? A radiographic evaluation from L1 to L5.

Authors:  Fan Zhang; Haocheng Xu; Bo Yin; Hongyue Tao; Shuo Yang; Chi Sun; Yitao Wang; Jun Yin; Minghao Shao; Hongli Wang; Xinlei Xia; Xiaosheng Ma; Feizhou Lu; Jianyuan Jiang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Variability in the size of the retroperitoneal oblique corridor: A magnetic resonance imaging-based analysis.

Authors:  Zain Boghani; William Iii Steele; Sean M Barber; Jonathan J Lee; Olumide Sokunbi; J Bob Blacklock; Todd Trask; Paul Holman
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2020-03-28

8.  Feasibility of Sub-Axial Cervical Laminar Screws, Including C7, in the Indian Population: A Study on 50 Patients Using Computed Tomography-Based Morphometry Measurements.

Authors:  Abhishek Srivastava; Geetanjali Nanda; Rajat Mahajan; Ankur Nanda; Sahil Batra; Nirajana Mishra; Naveen Pandita; Harvinder Singh Chhabra
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2018-10-18

9.  The OLIF working corridor based on magnetic resonance imaging: a retrospective research.

Authors:  Zhe Wang; Lei Liu; Xiang-He Xu; Ming-de Cao; Hai Lu; Kui-Bo Zhang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 2.359

Review 10.  Development and Application of Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

Authors:  Renjie Li; Xuefeng Li; Hong Zhou; Weimin Jiang
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2020-03-15       Impact factor: 2.071

View more
  1 in total

1.  A comparative morphometric analysis of operative windows for performing OLIF among normal and deformity group in lower lumbar spine.

Authors:  Devanand Degulmadi; Vatsal Parmar; Bharat Dave; Ajay Krishnan; Shivanand Mayi; Ravi Ranjan Rai; Shiv Bali; Prarthan Amin; Pritesh Agrawal
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2022-09-30
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.