OBJECTIVE: To compare and evaluate the regulatory effects of comprehensive psychological intervention on adverse emotions and immune status of cervical cancer patients during the perioperative period. METHODS: A total of 109 cervical cancer patients admitted to our hospital were selected and divided into the conventional group (n=54) and the comprehensive group (n=55). The conventional group received conventional nursing intervention, while the comprehensive group received comprehensive psychological and conventional nursing intervention. The adverse emotions, social support degrees, level of hope, sleep quality, immune functions and nursing satisfaction were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: On Day 10 after surgery, the comprehensive group had lower scores of hospital anxiety and depression scale-anxiety (HADS-A), and hospital anxiety and depression scale-depression (HADS-D), higher scores of social support rating scale (SSRS), intimate relationship, positive attitude, and attitude for actions, a higher excellent and good rate of social support degree (92.73% vs 75.93%), a lower Cortisol (Cor) level, and a higher level of interleukin-2 (IL-2) than the conventional group (P < 0.05). On Days 1, 3, 5, 7 and 10 after surgery, the scores of Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI) in the comprehensive group were lower than those in the conventional group (P < 0.05). The overall degree of nursing satisfaction in comprehensive group (94.55%) was higher than that in the conventional group (79.63%) (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION:Comprehensive psychological intervention can remarkably improve the negative emotions, social support degree, level of hope, sleep quality, immune functions, and satisfaction of cervical cancer patients receivingconventional nursing intervention during the perioperative period. AJTR
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To compare and evaluate the regulatory effects of comprehensive psychological intervention on adverse emotions and immune status of cervical cancerpatients during the perioperative period. METHODS: A total of 109 cervical cancerpatients admitted to our hospital were selected and divided into the conventional group (n=54) and the comprehensive group (n=55). The conventional group received conventional nursing intervention, while the comprehensive group received comprehensive psychological and conventional nursing intervention. The adverse emotions, social support degrees, level of hope, sleep quality, immune functions and nursing satisfaction were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: On Day 10 after surgery, the comprehensive group had lower scores of hospital anxiety and depression scale-anxiety (HADS-A), and hospital anxiety and depression scale-depression (HADS-D), higher scores of social support rating scale (SSRS), intimate relationship, positive attitude, and attitude for actions, a higher excellent and good rate of social support degree (92.73% vs 75.93%), a lower Cortisol (Cor) level, and a higher level of interleukin-2 (IL-2) than the conventional group (P < 0.05). On Days 1, 3, 5, 7 and 10 after surgery, the scores of Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI) in the comprehensive group were lower than those in the conventional group (P < 0.05). The overall degree of nursing satisfaction in comprehensive group (94.55%) was higher than that in the conventional group (79.63%) (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Comprehensive psychological intervention can remarkably improve the negative emotions, social support degree, level of hope, sleep quality, immune functions, and satisfaction of cervical cancerpatients receiving conventional nursing intervention during the perioperative period. AJTR
Authors: Brittany D Korotkin; Michael Hoerger; Sara Voorhees; Chynna O Allen; William R Robinson; Paul R Duberstein Journal: J Psychosoc Oncol Date: 2019-04-01
Authors: Bert N Uchino; Ryan Trettevik; Robert G Kent de Grey; Sierra Cronan; Jasara Hogan; Brian R W Baucom Journal: Health Psychol Date: 2018-03-22 Impact factor: 4.267
Authors: Emma Chad-Friedman; Sarah Coleman; Lara N Traeger; William F Pirl; Roberta Goldman; Steven J Atlas; Elyse R Park Journal: Cancer Date: 2017-08-22 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: James A Blumenthal; Yidan Zhu; Gary G Koch; Patrick J Smith; Lana L Watkins; Alan L Hinderliter; Benson M Hoffman; Joseph G Rogers; Patricia P Chang; Christopher O'Connor; Kristy S Johnson; Andrew Sherwood Journal: Health Psychol Date: 2019-04-18 Impact factor: 4.267
Authors: Fliss E M Murtagh; Aine Burns; Olivier Moranne; Rachael L Morton; Saraladevi Naicker Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2016-08-10 Impact factor: 8.237