Literature DB >> 34306187

Comparison of safety and efficacy between laparoscopic myomectomy and traditional laparotomy for patients with uterine fibroids and their effect on pregnancy rate after surgery.

Xueqiao Kan1, Xiaoxia Shen2, Li Feng3, Yuqing Hu4, Jiadong Yu5, Xiaoju Yang6.   

Abstract

The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the safety and efficacy between laparoscopic myomectomy and traditional laparotomy for patients with uterine fibroids and determine their effect on the pregnancy rate after surgery. In total, 86 cases with uterine fibroids were selected among patients who were admitted in the Zhangqiu District Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital during the period of April, 2016 to April, 2017. Patients who underwent laparoscopic myomectomy were enrolled in group A (n=42), and those who underwent traditional laparotomy were placed in group B (n=44). The general linear data and the operative indicators were compared. The VAS scores, serum IFN-γ, IL-6, VEGF levels and clinical efficacy of the two groups were also compared one week after surgery. Postoperative pregnancy rates and complications in both groups were also compared. No significant differences were observed in general data between the two groups (P>0.05). The intra-operative blood loss in the group A was lower than that in group B (P<0.05), the average time of operation, hospital stays (days), and anal exhaust time in group A were shorter than those in group B (P<0.05). The pain degrees at 3, 6 and 18 h after surgery for patients in the group A were significantly lower than those of the group B (P<0.05). There was no significant difference IL-6 and VEGF levels in the serum between groups A and B before and after surgery (P>0.05); however, the level of IFN-γ expression, one week after surgery, in group B was significantly higher than that in group A (P<0.05). The pregnancy rate in the experimental group was higher than that in the control group (P<0.05), and the incidence rate of complications in group A was significantly lower than that in group B (P<0.05). Results presented in the present study suggested that compared to traditional laparotomy, laparoscopic myomectomy is a more advantageous method in terms of safety, efficacy and pregnancy rate after surgery.
Copyright © 2020, Spandidos Publications.

Entities:  

Keywords:  laparoscopy; laparotomy; pregnancy rate; surgery; uterine fibroids

Year:  2021        PMID: 34306187      PMCID: PMC8281455          DOI: 10.3892/etm.2021.10345

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Ther Med        ISSN: 1792-0981            Impact factor:   2.447


  35 in total

1.  Long-term results of laparoscopic myomectomy: recurrence rate in comparison with abdominal myomectomy.

Authors:  A Rossetti; O Sizzi; L Soranna; F Cucinelli; S Mancuso; A Lanzone
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 2.  The effect of intramural fibroids without uterine cavity involvement on the outcome of IVF treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sesh Kamal Sunkara; Mohammed Khairy; Tarek El-Toukhy; Yacoub Khalaf; Arri Coomarasamy
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2009-11-12       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 3.  Effects of laparoscopic versus minilaparotomic myomectomy on uterine leiomyoma: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Qi Shen; Miaomiao Chen; Ying Wang; Qingfeng Zhou; Xuejiao Tao; Wenwen Zhang; Xueqiong Zhu
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2014-09-28       Impact factor: 4.137

Review 4.  Uterine Fibroids - Current Trends and Strategies.

Authors:  Marcel Grube; Felix Neis; Sara Y Brucker; Stefan Kommoss; Jürgen Andress; Martin Weiss; Sascha Hoffmann; Florin-Andrei Taran; Bernhard Krämer
Journal:  Surg Technol Int       Date:  2019-05-15

Review 5.  Uterine artery embolisation in women with symptomatic uterine fibroids.

Authors:  Paul N M Lohle; David Higué; Denis Herbreteau
Journal:  Presse Med       Date:  2019-04-27       Impact factor: 1.228

6.  The menstrual cycle and blood loss during laparoscopic myomectomy.

Authors:  Nisse V Clark; Karen C Wang; Jessica Opoku-Anane; Catherine I Hill-Lydecker; Allison F Vitonis; Jon I Einarsson; Sarah L Cohen
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.636

7.  Comparison of 30-day Complication Rates between Laparoscopic Myomectomy and Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for the Treatment of Uterine Leiomyoma in Women Older Than Age 40.

Authors:  David Sheyn; C Emi Bretschnieder; Sangeeta T Mahajan; Sherif El-Nashar; Megan Billow; Cara S Ninivaggio
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 4.137

8.  Nerve-sparing versus non-nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: surgical and long-term oncological outcomes.

Authors:  Antonio Gil-Moreno; Melchor Carbonell-Socias; Sabina Salicrú; Melissa Bradbury; Ángel García; Ramona Vergés; Oriol Puig Puig; José Luís Sánchez-Iglesias; Silvia Cabrera-Díaz; Javier de la Torre; Natalia R Gómez-Hidalgo; Assumpció Pérez-Benavente; Berta Díaz-Feijoo
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2019-07-16

9.  Spontaneous uterine rupture after abdominal myomectomy at the gestational age of 20 weeks in pregnancy: A case report.

Authors:  Hamideh Pakniat; Nasrin Soofizadeh; Marzieh Beigom Khezri
Journal:  Int J Reprod Biomed (Yazd)       Date:  2016-07

10.  Robotic-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy: the feasibility in single-site system.

Authors:  Su Hyeon Choi; Soyeon Hong; Miseon Kim; Hyo Sook Bae; Mi Kyoung Kim; Mi-La Kim; Yong Wook Jung; Bo Seong Yun; Seok Ju Seong
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2018-11-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.