| Literature DB >> 34304238 |
Ki-Tack Kim1, Kee-Yong Ha1, Yong-Chan Kim1, Keun-Ho Lee2, Sang-Il Kim3, Young-Hoon Kim3, Sung-Min Kim1.
Abstract
STUDYEntities:
Keywords: Ankylosing spondylitis; Anterior resorption; Cervical vertebrae; Sagittal alignment
Year: 2021 PMID: 34304238 PMCID: PMC9260409 DOI: 10.31616/asj.2020.0669
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Asian Spine J ISSN: 1976-1902
Fig. 1Study design. CT, computed tomography; mSASSS, modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spinal Score.
Fig. 2Radiographic measurements of the cervical spine: C2–C7 lordosis angle, C2–C7 sagittal vertical axis (C2–C7 SVA), C0–C7 lordosis angle, and T1 slope. The percentage of anterior resorption of vertebral body was obtained by ratio of the narrowest anteroposterior distance of scaffolding vertebra to the mean anteroposterior distance of the two adjacent cervical vertebral bodies.
Fig. 3A 29-year-old man with kyphosis of the thoracolumbar spine with complete bridging the cervical spine. (A, B) Whole spine anteroposterior and lateral radiographs showing the complete ankylosis and thoracolumbar kyphosis. (C) A radiograph showing anterior resorption of the C4, C5, and C6. (D) Three-dimensional computed tomography showing the complete ankylosis of the whole spines.
Fig. 4A 49-year-old man with severe kyphosis of the thoracolumbar spine and complete bridging the cervical spine. (A, B) Whole spine anteroposterior and lateral radiographs. (C) A radiograph showing complete ankylosis of the cervical spine including the occipitocervical junction. No anterior bony resorption of the cervical spines was observed. (D) Computed tomography showing complete ankylosis of the spine without anterior resorption of the cervical spines.
Comparison of demographic and radiographic data
| Characteristic | Group 1 (n=28) | Group 2 (n=52) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (yr) | 46.2±9.8 | 47.8±10.4 | 0.588[ |
| Sex (female %) | 10.7 | 9.6 | 1.000[ |
| Disease duration (yr) | 21.9±4.7 | 11.9 ±2.9 | 0.724[ |
| C0–C7 lordosis (°) | −35.8±39.6 | −48.3±22.9 | 0.169[ |
| C2–C7 lordosis (°) (A) | −8.7±13.4 | −10.9±11.5 | 0.556[ |
| C2–C7 SVA (cm) | 6.2±1.7 | 6.2±1.8 | 0.978[ |
| T1 slope (°) (B) | 52.2±11.1 | 53.3±9.9 | 0.742[ |
| B–A (°) | 61.0±21.4 | 64.2±18.5 | 0.589[ |
| T1–T4 kyphosis (°) | 8.5±5.8 | 9.6±7.8 | 0.574[ |
| T4–T12 kyphosis (°) | 48.1±14.9 | 46.6±13.2 | 0.725[ |
| C7 SVA (cm) | 14.3±4.9 | 14.6±6.2 | 0.823[ |
| T1 pelvic angle (°) | 27.1±8.9 | 31.6±11.2 | 0.382 |
Values are presented as mean±standard deviation or %.
SVA, sagittal vertical axis.
By Student t-test was performed.
By Fisher’s exact test was performed.
Correlation analysis between the extent of anterior resorption and radiographic parameters
| Resorption% | C0–C7 lordosis | C2–C7 lordosis | C2–C7 SVA | T1 slope | T1–T4 kyphosis | T4–T12 kyphosis | C7 SVA | T1PA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| −0.305 | −0.428[ | −0.282 | 0.163 | −0.375[ | 0.212 | −0.097 | −0.295 |
| 0.107 | 0.021[ | 0.139 | 0.399 | 0.045[ | 0.269 | 0.617 | 0.490 |
Spearman test was performed.
SVA, sagittal vertical axis; T1PA, T1 pelvic angle.
Indicates significant difference (p<0.05).