Literature DB >> 34302043

Computed tomography angiography scoring systems and the role of skull defects in the confirmation of brain death.

Petros Zampakis1, Vasilios Panagiotopoulos2, Christina Kalogeropoulou3, Maria Karachaliou3, Diamanto Aretha4, Nektarios Sioulas4, Sofia Dimoulia3, Dimitrios Karnabatidis3, Fotini Fligou4.   

Abstract

To assess and compare all current computed tomography angiography (CTA) scoring systems for the diagnostic workup of brain death (BD) to digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and clinical tests. Fifty-two patients with a clinical suspicion of BD underwent CTA and subsequently DSA. The diagnostic performance of all current CTA scoring systems was compared to that of DSA, in all patients with a suspicion of BD. A comparison to clinical tests was made only in DSA-positive for BD patients (n = 49), since in DSA-negative BD patients (n = 3) clinical tests were not performed. Further subgroup analysis was performed in relation to skull defects (SDs) stratification. Statistical analysis was conducted by applying statistics-contingency tables, Cochran's-Q test and McNemar's test. The CTA -10, and -7- and all 4-point scoring systems, showed overall sensitivities of 81,6%, 87.8% and 95.9% respectively and 100% specificity, when compared to DSA. In patients with a clinical verification of BD, the CTA -10 and -7-point scoring systems were significantly inferior to clinical tests (p = 0.004 and p = 0.031), while the 4-point scoring systems showed no such difference (p = 0.5). All 4-point scoring systems showed 100% sensitivity in patients with a minor SD or no SD. In patients with a major SD, all CTA scoring systems (- 10, - 7- and all 4-point) were less sensitive (62.5%, 62.5% and 75% respectively). The presence of a major SD was associated with an 8 × relative risk for false negative results in all 4-point scoring systems. CTA showed excellent diagnostic performance in patients with a suspicion of BD. The 4-point CTA scoring systems are the most sensitive for the diagnosis of BD, although in patients with a major SD patient, the role of CTA is ambiguous.
© 2021. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34302043     DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-94763-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  24 in total

1.  Evidence-based guideline update: determining brain death in adults: report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology.

Authors:  Eelco F M Wijdicks; Panayiotis N Varelas; Gary S Gronseth; David M Greer
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 9.910

2.  Diagnosis of brain death using two-phase spiral CT.

Authors:  B Dupas; M Gayet-Delacroix; D Villers; D Antonioli; M F Veccherini; J P Soulillou
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  The role of spiral CT for the assessment of the intracranial circulation in suspected brain-death.

Authors:  X Leclerc; C A Taschner; A Vidal; G Strecker; J Savage; J Y Gauvrit; J P Pruvo
Journal:  J Neuroradiol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.447

Review 4.  Brain Death.

Authors:  Mack Drake; Andrew Bernard; Eugene Hessel
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.741

5.  Variability in brain death determination in europe: looking for a solution.

Authors:  Giuseppe Citerio; Ilaria Alice Crippa; Alfio Bronco; Alessia Vargiolu; Martin Smith
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.210

6.  Computed tomographic angiography criteria in the diagnosis of brain death-comparison of sensitivity and interobserver reliability of different evaluation scales.

Authors:  Marcin Sawicki; R Bohatyrewicz; K Safranow; A Walecka; J Walecki; O Rowinski; J Solek-Pastuszka; Z Czajkowski; M Guzinski; M Burzynska; J Wojczal
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 2.804

7.  CT angiography for brain death diagnosis.

Authors:  E Frampas; M Videcoq; E de Kerviler; F Ricolfi; V Kuoch; F Mourey; A Tenaillon; B Dupas
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2009-04-30       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 8.  Brain blood flow in the neurological determination of death: Canadian expert report.

Authors:  Sam D Shemie; Donald Lee; Michael Sharpe; Donatella Tampieri; Bryan Young
Journal:  Can J Neurol Sci       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.104

9.  Determination of Brain Death/Death by Neurologic Criteria: The World Brain Death Project.

Authors:  David M Greer; Sam D Shemie; Ariane Lewis; Sylvia Torrance; Panayiotis Varelas; Fernando D Goldenberg; James L Bernat; Michael Souter; Mehmet Akif Topcuoglu; Anne W Alexandrov; Marie Baldisseri; Thomas Bleck; Giuseppe Citerio; Rosanne Dawson; Arnold Hoppe; Stephen Jacobe; Alex Manara; Thomas A Nakagawa; Thaddeus Mason Pope; William Silvester; David Thomson; Hussain Al Rahma; Rafael Badenes; Andrew J Baker; Vladimir Cerny; Cherylee Chang; Tiffany R Chang; Elena Gnedovskaya; Moon-Ku Han; Stephen Honeybul; Edgar Jimenez; Yasuhiro Kuroda; Gang Liu; Uzzwal Kumar Mallick; Victoria Marquevich; Jorge Mejia-Mantilla; Michael Piradov; Sarah Quayyum; Gentle Sunder Shrestha; Ying-Ying Su; Shelly D Timmons; Jeanne Teitelbaum; Walter Videtta; Kapil Zirpe; Gene Sung
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Revised CT angiography venous score with consideration of infratentorial circulation value for diagnosing brain death.

Authors:  Antoine J Marchand; Philippe Seguin; Yannick Malledant; Marion Taleb; Hélène Raoult; Jean Yves Gauvrit
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 6.925

View more
  1 in total

1.  Clinical application of digital technology in the reconstruction of soft tissue defects of the lower extremity with free superficial circumflex iliac artery flap.

Authors:  Jiayu Li; Xuchao Luo; Anming Liu; Yonggen Zou
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-09-02
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.