Literature DB >> 16733422

The role of spiral CT for the assessment of the intracranial circulation in suspected brain-death.

X Leclerc1, C A Taschner, A Vidal, G Strecker, J Savage, J Y Gauvrit, J P Pruvo.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the role of spiral CT for the diagnosis of brain death.
METHODS: Over a 12-month period, 15 patients that fulfilled the clinical criteria of brain death were referred from the intensive care unit to evaluate remaining intracranial blood flow by spiral CT. The clinical diagnosis was confirmed by an apnea test in all cases. Two phases of spiral CT were performed at 20 and 60 seconds after the start of contrast media injection. Qualitative analysis included the evaluation of vessel opacification (arteries and veins) by two radiologists in consensus.
RESULTS: The cortical segments of the middle cerebral artery (MCA) were assessable in all patients, whereas the internal cerebral veins could not be evaluated in five patients due to artifacts or intracranial hemorrhage. Opacification of the major branches of the circle of Willis was observed in seven cases. Unilateral opacification of cortical branches of the MCA occurred in one. We did not observe bilateral enhancement of cortical MCA branches. The internal cerebral veins did not enhance in brain death.
CONCLUSION: The absence of internal cerebral vein opacification and the absence of bilateral enhancement of cortical MCA branches constituted the best criteria of brain death by contrast enhanced spiral CT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16733422     DOI: 10.1016/s0150-9861(06)77237-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0150-9861            Impact factor:   3.447


  19 in total

Review 1.  [Not Available].

Authors:  H Lanfermann; F Götz; P Raab
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 3.649

2.  [Angiographic procedures for determination of cessation of cerebral circulation].

Authors:  H Lanfermann
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.214

3.  Limitations of brain death in the interpretation of computed tomographic angiography.

Authors:  Ari R Joffe
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2007-10-17       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Diagnosing brain death by CT perfusion and multislice CT angiography.

Authors:  Dolores Escudero; Jesús Otero; Lara Marqués; Diego Parra; José Antonio Gonzalo; Guillermo M Albaiceta; Luis Cofiño; Armando Blanco; Pedro Vega; Eduardo Murias; Angela Meilan; Ricardo López Roger; Francisco Taboada
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 3.210

5.  CT angiography as a confirmatory test in diagnosis of brain death: comparison between three scoring systems.

Authors:  Hilal Şahin; Yeliz Pekçevik
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.630

6.  Technical aids in the diagnosis of brain death: a comparison of SEP, AEP, EEG, TCD and CT angiography.

Authors:  Stefan Welschehold; Stephan Boor; Katharina Reuland; Frank Thömke; Thomas Kerz; André Reuland; Christian Beyer; Martin Gartenschläger; Wolfgang Wagner; Alf Giese; Wibke Müller-Forell
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 5.594

7.  Impact of Skull Defects on the Role of CTA for Brain Death Confirmation.

Authors:  D M Nunes; A C M Maia; R C Boni; A J da Rocha
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Diffusion-weighted imaging findings in brain death.

Authors:  Hakan Selcuk; Sait Albayram; Ercan Tureci; Zehra Isik Hasiloglu; Osman Kizilkilic; Emin Cagil; Naci Kocer; Civan Islak
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 9.  Computed tomography angiography in the diagnosis of brain death: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Andreas H Kramer; Derek J Roberts
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.210

10.  Computed tomographic angiography criteria in the diagnosis of brain death-comparison of sensitivity and interobserver reliability of different evaluation scales.

Authors:  Marcin Sawicki; R Bohatyrewicz; K Safranow; A Walecka; J Walecki; O Rowinski; J Solek-Pastuszka; Z Czajkowski; M Guzinski; M Burzynska; J Wojczal
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 2.804

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.