Literature DB >> 34301293

DNA-protein interaction studies: a historical and comparative analysis.

Ricardo André Campos Ferraz1,2, Ana Lúcia Gonçalves Lopes1,2, Jessy Ariana Faria da Silva2,3, Diana Filipa Viana Moreira1,2, Maria João Nogueira Ferreira1,2, Sílvia Vieira de Almeida Coimbra4,5.   

Abstract

DNA-protein interactions are essential for several molecular and cellular mechanisms, such as transcription, transcriptional regulation, DNA modifications, among others. For many decades scientists tried to unravel how DNA links to proteins, forming complex and vital interactions. However, the high number of techniques developed for the study of these interactions made the choice of the appropriate technique a difficult task. This review intends to provide a historical context and compile the methods that describe DNA-protein interactions according to the purpose of each approach, summarise the respective advantages and disadvantages and give some examples of recent uses for each technique. The final aim of this work is to help in deciding which technique to perform according to the objectives and capacities of each research team. Considering the DNA-binding proteins characterisation, filter binding assay and EMSA are easy in vitro methods that rapidly identify nucleic acid-protein binding interactions. To find DNA-binding sites, DNA-footprinting is indeed an easier, faster and reliable approach, however, techniques involving base analogues and base-site selection are more precise. Concerning binding kinetics and affinities, filter binding assay and EMSA are useful and easy methods, although SPR and spectroscopy techniques are more sensitive. Finally, relatively to genome-wide studies, ChIP-seq is the desired method, given the coverage and resolution of the technique. In conclusion, although some experiments are easier and faster than others, when designing a DNA-protein interaction study several concerns should be taken and different techniques may need to be considered, since different methods confer different precisions and accuracies.
© 2021. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  ChIP; DNA-footprinting; DNA–protein interaction; EMSA; SELEX; SPR

Year:  2021        PMID: 34301293     DOI: 10.1186/s13007-021-00780-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Methods        ISSN: 1746-4811            Impact factor:   4.993


  70 in total

1.  Amino acid-base interactions: a three-dimensional analysis of protein-DNA interactions at an atomic level.

Authors:  N M Luscombe; R A Laskowski; J M Thornton
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2001-07-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Genetic regulatory mechanisms in the synthesis of proteins.

Authors:  F JACOB; J MONOD
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1961-06       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  Sequence-specific recognition of double helical nucleic acids by proteins.

Authors:  N C Seeman; J M Rosenberg; A Rich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Prediction of DNA-binding residues from sequence.

Authors:  Yanay Ofran; Venkatesh Mysore; Burkhard Rost
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-07-01       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  Cell specificity of histones.

Authors:  E STEDMAN
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1950-11-04       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 6.  Methods for the analysis of DNA-protein interactions.

Authors:  M J Guille; G G Kneale
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 2.695

7.  Protein-DNA interaction. No code for recognition.

Authors:  B W Matthews
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1988-09-22       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  The preferential interactions of polylysine and polyarginine with specific base sequences in DNA.

Authors:  M Leng; G Felsenfeld
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1966-10       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  Protein-DNA recognition.

Authors:  C O Pabo; R T Sauer
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 23.643

10.  Structure of catabolite gene activator protein at 2.9 A resolution suggests binding to left-handed B-DNA.

Authors:  D B McKay; T A Steitz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1981-04-30       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Advances and Trends in Omics Technology Development.

Authors:  Xiaofeng Dai; Li Shen
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-07-01

Review 2.  Complexome Profiling-Exploring Mitochondrial Protein Complexes in Health and Disease.

Authors:  Alfredo Cabrera-Orefice; Alisa Potter; Felix Evers; Johannes F Hevler; Sergio Guerrero-Castillo
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2022-01-12

3.  Plant-DTI: Extending the landscape of TF protein and DNA interaction in plants by a machine learning-based approach.

Authors:  Bhukrit Ruengsrichaiya; Chakarida Nukoolkit; Saowalak Kalapanulak; Treenut Saithong
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 6.627

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.