Henrik Wiegelmann1, Karin Wolf-Ostermann2, Werner Brannath3, Farhad Arzideh3, Jan Dreyer4, Rene Thyrian4, Liane Schirra-Weirich5, Lisa Verhaert5. 1. Institute for Public Health and Nursing Research, Health Sciences Bremen, University of Bremen, Grazer Straße 4, 28359, Bremen, Germany. hwiegelmann@uni-bremen.de. 2. Institute for Public Health and Nursing Research, Health Sciences Bremen, University of Bremen, Grazer Straße 4, 28359, Bremen, Germany. 3. Competence Centre for Clinical Trials, University of Bremen and Clinic Bremen-Mitte, Bremen, Germany. 4. German Centre for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Site Witten, Germany. 5. Department of Social Services, Centre for Participation Research, Catholic University of Applied Sciences of North Rhine-Westphalia, Cologne, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Studies revealed the importance to assess dementia care dyads, composed of persons with dementia and their primary informal caregivers, in a differentiated way and to tailor support services to particular living and care circumstances. Therefore, this study aims first to identify classes of dementia care dyads that differ according to sociodemographic, care-related and dementia-specific characteristics and second, to compare these classes with regard to healthcare-related outcomes. METHODS: We used data from the cross-sectional German DemNet-D study (n = 551) and conducted a latent class analysis to investigate different classes of dementia care dyads. In addition, we compared these classes with regard to the use of health care services, caregiver burden (BIZA-D), general health of the informal caregiver (EQ-VAS) as well as quality of life (QoL-AD) and social participation (SACA) of the person with dementia. Furthermore, we compared the stability of the home-based care arrangements. RESULTS: Six different classes of dementia care dyads were identified, based on best Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC), significant likelihood ratio test (p < 0.001), high entropy (0.87) and substantive interpretability. Classes were labelled as "adult child parent relationship & younger informal caregiver", "adult child parent relationship & middle aged informal caregiver", "non family relationship & younger informal caregiver", "couple & male informal caregiver of older age", "couple & female informal caregiver of older age", "couple & younger informal caregiver". The classes showed significant differences regarding health care service use. Caregiver burden, quality of life of the person with dementia and stability of the care arrangement differed also significantly between the classes. CONCLUSION: Based on a latent class analysis this study indicates differences between classes of informal dementia care dyads. The findings may give direction for better tailoring of support services to particular circumstances to improve healthcare-related outcomes of persons with dementia and informal caregivers.
BACKGROUND: Studies revealed the importance to assess dementia care dyads, composed of persons with dementia and their primary informal caregivers, in a differentiated way and to tailor support services to particular living and care circumstances. Therefore, this study aims first to identify classes of dementia care dyads that differ according to sociodemographic, care-related and dementia-specific characteristics and second, to compare these classes with regard to healthcare-related outcomes. METHODS: We used data from the cross-sectional German DemNet-D study (n = 551) and conducted a latent class analysis to investigate different classes of dementia care dyads. In addition, we compared these classes with regard to the use of health care services, caregiver burden (BIZA-D), general health of the informal caregiver (EQ-VAS) as well as quality of life (QoL-AD) and social participation (SACA) of the person with dementia. Furthermore, we compared the stability of the home-based care arrangements. RESULTS: Six different classes of dementia care dyads were identified, based on best Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC), significant likelihood ratio test (p < 0.001), high entropy (0.87) and substantive interpretability. Classes were labelled as "adult child parent relationship & younger informal caregiver", "adult child parent relationship & middle aged informal caregiver", "non family relationship & younger informal caregiver", "couple & male informal caregiver of older age", "couple & female informal caregiver of older age", "couple & younger informal caregiver". The classes showed significant differences regarding health care service use. Caregiver burden, quality of life of the person with dementia and stability of the care arrangement differed also significantly between the classes. CONCLUSION: Based on a latent class analysis this study indicates differences between classes of informal dementia care dyads. The findings may give direction for better tailoring of support services to particular circumstances to improve healthcare-related outcomes of persons with dementia and informal caregivers.
Keywords:
Caregiver burden; Caregiver health; Dementia; Dementia care dyads; Health care service use; Informal caregivers; Latent class analysis; Quality of life; Stability of care arrangements
Authors: Melanie Braun; Urte Scholz; Barbara Bailey; Sonja Perren; Rainer Hornung; Mike Martin Journal: Aging Ment Health Date: 2009-05 Impact factor: 3.658
Authors: K J Gilhooly; M L M Gilhooly; M P Sullivan; A McIntyre; L Wilson; E Harding; R Woodbridge; S Crutch Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2016-05-18 Impact factor: 3.921
Authors: Jan Dreyer; Johannes Michael Bergmann; Kerstin Köhler; Iris Hochgraeber; Christiane Pinkert; Martina Roes; Jochen René Thyrian; Henrik Wiegelmann; Bernhard Holle Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2022-09-01 Impact factor: 4.070