Literature DB >> 34296992

SARS-CoV-2 Neutralization Resistance Mutations in Patient with HIV/AIDS, California, USA.

Seth A Hoffman, Cristina Costales, Malaya K Sahoo, Srikanth Palanisamy, Fumiko Yamamoto, ChunHong Huang, Michelle Verghese, Daniel A Solis, Mamdouh Sibai, Aruna Subramanian, Lucy S Tompkins, Philip Grant, Robert W Shafer, Benjamin A Pinsky.   

Abstract

We report persistent severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection in a patient with HIV/AIDS; the virus developed spike N terminal domain and receptor binding domain neutralization resistance mutations. Our findings suggest that immunocompromised patients can harbor emerging variants of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.

Entities:  

Keywords:  2019 novel coronavirus disease; COVID-19; California; HIV/AIDS; SARS-CoV-2; United States; antimicrobial resistance; coronavirus disease; coronaviruses; immunocompromised; respiratory infections; severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2; viral evolution; viruses; zoonoses

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34296992      PMCID: PMC8462335          DOI: 10.3201/eid2710.211461

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis        ISSN: 1080-6040            Impact factor:   6.883


In December 2020, a 61-year-old woman living with HIV/AIDS was tested for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection at a community testing center in California, USA; she produced an anterior nasal swab sample that tested positive by reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR). At the time of sample collection, she had a 10-day history of nonproductive cough, and was not receiving antiretroviral therapy (Figure). Her CD4 count was 13 cells/μL and HIV-1 viral load was 262,000 copies/mL. She never required hospitalization for SARS-CoV-2 infection. Thirty days after symptom onset, she no longer had respiratory symptoms and underwent SARS-CoV-2 screening upon admission to Stanford Hospital (Stanford, CA, USA) for treatment of a severe decubitus ulcer. Her nasopharyngeal swab (NPS) sample tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR (cycle threshold [Ct] value 17.6). We detected minus-strand viral RNA, indicating active viral replication (). On day 33, three days after admission to Stanford Hospital, antibody testing showed plasma positive for IgM against SARS-CoV-2 spike receptor binding domain (RBD) but negative for IgG against SARS-CoV-2 spike S1 (,). She began antiretroviral therapy (ART) 38 days after symptom onset. On day 45, an NPS sample tested positive (Ct 16.6) for SARS-CoV-2 with detectable minus-strand RNA.
Figure

Timeline of SARS-CoV-2 infection in a patient with HIV/AIDS, California, USA. Line breaks indicate separation in time intervals. Replication indicates detection of minus-strand RNA. ART, antiretroviral therapy; IgG, spike S1 domain IgG; IgM, spike receptor binding domain IgM; VL, HIV viral load; +, positive; –, negative.

Timeline of SARS-CoV-2 infection in a patient with HIV/AIDS, California, USA. Line breaks indicate separation in time intervals. Replication indicates detection of minus-strand RNA. ART, antiretroviral therapy; IgG, spike S1 domain IgG; IgM, spike receptor binding domain IgM; VL, HIV viral load; +, positive; –, negative. Because the patient had ongoing viral replication, we conducted whole-genome sequencing using archived nucleic acids from the NPS samples collected on days 30 and 45. We enriched the viral genome using laboratory-developed multiplex RT-PCR reactions that generated multiple overlapping amplicons of ≈1,200 bp. We prepared fragment libraries using NEBNext DNA Library Prep reagents (New England Biolabs, https://www.neb.com) according to the manufacturer’s instructions; we sequenced the libraries on Illumina MiSeq with single-end 150-cycle sequencing using MiSeq Reagent Kit v3 (https://www.illumina.com). We assembled the consensus sequences and identified mutations using a custom bioinformatics pipeline and SARS-CoV-2 isolate Wuhan-Hu-1 (GenBank accession no. NC_45512.2) as reference. For these 2 samples we observed mean whole-genome coverage of 963× (day 30) and 894× (day 45). We used the consensus sequences from the day 30 (GISAID accession no. EPI_ISL_2009056) and day 45 (GISAID accession no. EPI_ISL_2009057) samples to query the GISAID CoVserver (https://www.gisaid.org) and Phylogenetic Assignment of Named Global Outbreak LINeages (PANGOLIN, https://pangolin.cog-uk.io) to determine clade and lineage. The sequence from the sample taken on day 30 revealed a G clade, B.1.234 lineage virus (Table). Because the day 45 sequence shares 18 mutations (8 synonymous and 10 nonsynonynmous) with the day 30 sequence and is the most closely related sequence to the day 30 sequence in GISAID, we believe the day 45 sequence probably evolved from the day 30 sequence. The day 45 sequence contained additional spike mutations, including C15F (variant percent 44.3%), del141_144 (17.5%), Y248N (13.4%), ins248_Y/LLSFN (44.5%), and E484Q (67.7%) (Table). The cysteine residue at position 15 (C15) in the spike N terminal domain (NTD) is linked by a disulfide bond to C136; mutations at either of these positions alter this bond and reduce neutralization by monoclonal antibodies (). Deletions and insertions in the NTD are also involved in immune escape, including the common del141_144 mutation and insertions at position Y248 (). The E484Q mutation is located in the RBD domain of the spike gene and is also found in the Kappa variant of interest (i.e., B.1.617.1) (). Viruses harboring E484Q have reduced susceptibility to monoclonal antibodies, convalescent plasma, and vaccinee plasma (,).
Table

Mutations in severe acure respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 sequences from a patient with HIV/AIDS, California, USA*

Nucleotide mutationTranslationVariant reads/read depth (%)
Day 30Day 45
Day 45 sample only
21606G>TS: C15FND661/1,493 (44.3)
d21982_12S: del_141–144ND248/1,420 (17.5)
22304T>AS: Y248NND333/2,488 (13.4)
ins_22304_12 (TAT>TTACTCAGTTTTAAT)S: ins_248_Y->LLSFNND919/2,065 (44.5)
23012G>C
S: E484Q
ND
1,088/1,607 (67.7)
Day 30 sample only
26801C>TMembrane protein: L93L753/2,196 (34.3)ND
27146A>G
Membrane protein: T208T
567/1,843 (30.8)
ND
Both samples
241C>T5′ untranslated region1,206/1,213 (99.4)848/851 (99.6)
829C>TNSP2: N8N862/866 (99.5)652/653 (99.8)
2258G>ANSP2: V485I3,280/3,293 (99.6)1,524/1,528 (99.7)
3037C>TNSP3: F106F1,781/1,783 (99.9)1,139/1,142 (99.7)
6441A>GNSP3: K1241R2,385/2,389 (99.8)1,499/1,500 (99.9)
8140C>TNSP3: S1807S2,491/2,505 (99.4)1,399/1,410 (99.2)
9204A>GNSP4: D217G1,395/1,401 (99.6)651/653 (99.7)
10015C>TNSP4: Y487Y527/530 (99.4)244/245 (99.6)
10641C>TNSP5: T196M516/517 (99.8)176/179 (98.3)
13858G>TNSP12: D131Y (or RdRp D140Y)3,814/3,832 (99.5)3,081/3,100 (99.4)
14408C>TNSP12: P314L (or RdRp P323L)3,923/3,938 (99.6)2,872/2,890 (99.4)
18288A>GNSP14: V83V2,498/2,521 (99.1)1,868/1,886 (99.0)
20268A>GNSP15: L216L1,655/1,662 (99.6)873/885 (98.6)
23403A>GS: D614G2,991/3,018 (99.1)1,792/1,800 (99.6)
28744C>TNP: I157I5,669/5,704 (99.4)4,311/4,343 (99.3)
28854C>TNP: S194L5,681/5,706 (99.6)4,477/4,498 (99.5)
29384G>TNP: D371Y5,843/5,889 (99.2)4,779/4,807 (99.4)
29445C>TNP: T391I5,928/6,006 (98.7)4,641/4,670 (99.4)

*Compared with the reference Wuhan-Hu-1 (GenBank accession no. NC_045512.2) sequence. Patient samples collected 30 (hCoV-19/USA/CA-Stanford-07_S25/2021, GISAID accession no. EPI_ISL_2009057) and 45 (hCoV-19/USA/CA-Stanford-07_S24/2021, GISAID accession no. EPI_ISL_2009056) days after symptom onset. ND, not detected; NP, nucleoprotein; NSP, nonstructural protein; RdRp, RNA-dependent RNA polymerase; S, spike protein.

*Compared with the reference Wuhan-Hu-1 (GenBank accession no. NC_045512.2) sequence. Patient samples collected 30 (hCoV-19/USA/CA-Stanford-07_S25/2021, GISAID accession no. EPI_ISL_2009057) and 45 (hCoV-19/USA/CA-Stanford-07_S24/2021, GISAID accession no. EPI_ISL_2009056) days after symptom onset. ND, not detected; NP, nucleoprotein; NSP, nonstructural protein; RdRp, RNA-dependent RNA polymerase; S, spike protein. The patient showed SARS-CoV-2 IgG seroconversion on day 51, thirteen days after initiating ART. SARS-CoV-2 antibody isotypes typically follow a similar time-course; IgM, IgA, and IgG usually become detectable ≈14 days after illness onset (). This patient’s delayed IgG class switch was probably caused by HIV/AIDS-associated B-cell dysfunction; we hypothesize that the ineffective IgM response might have selected for the observed spike mutations (). On day 55, seventeen days after initiating ART, the patient’s HIV-1 viral load was 330 copies/mL. An NPS sample collected that day was negative for minus-strand SARS-CoV-2 RNA, and the viral load had decreased >1,000-fold (Ct 27.2). The patient’s SARS-CoV-2 infection remained asymptomatic throughout her hospitalization. On day 93, she produced an NPS sample that tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 RNA. In summary, we describe an HIV-positive patient who had a prolonged course of asymptomatic, active SARS-CoV-2 infection leading to the emergence of NTD and RBD mutations associated with reduced antibody neutralization. Our findings add to the accumulating evidence that immunocompromised persons, including persons living with HIV/AIDS, might host ongoing SARS-CoV-2 replication that could enable the development of variants of concern/interest (F. Karim, unpub. data, https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.06.03.21258228v1). The emergence of multiple spike mutations in this patient over a relatively short timeframe (i.e., 15 days) further highlights the potential role of persons living with uncontrolled HIV as possible sources of SARS-CoV-2 variants. Finally, these findings emphasize the need to diagnose HIV in the >6 million infected persons worldwide who are unaware of their status and provide them with accessible ART. These interventions are critical for overall global health and might also contribute to controlling the COVID-19 pandemic.
  9 in total

Review 1.  B cells in HIV infection and disease.

Authors:  Susan Moir; Anthony S Fauci
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 53.106

2.  A SARS-CoV-2 Variant with L452R and E484Q Neutralization Resistance Mutations.

Authors:  Michelle Verghese; Becky Jiang; Naomi Iwai; Marilyn Mar; Malaya K Sahoo; Fumiko Yamamoto; Kenji O Mfuh; Jacob Miller; Hannah Wang; James Zehnder; Benjamin A Pinsky
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Strand-Specific Reverse Transcription PCR for Detection of Replicating SARS-CoV-2.

Authors:  Catherine A Hogan; ChunHong Huang; Malaya K Sahoo; Hannah Wang; Becky Jiang; Mamdouh Sibai; Marisa Holubar; Roshni Mathew; James Zehnder; Benjamin A Pinsky
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 6.883

4.  N-terminal domain antigenic mapping reveals a site of vulnerability for SARS-CoV-2.

Authors:  Matthew McCallum; Anna De Marco; Florian A Lempp; M Alejandra Tortorici; Dora Pinto; Alexandra C Walls; Martina Beltramello; Alex Chen; Zhuoming Liu; Fabrizia Zatta; Samantha Zepeda; Julia di Iulio; John E Bowen; Martin Montiel-Ruiz; Jiayi Zhou; Laura E Rosen; Siro Bianchi; Barbara Guarino; Chiara Silacci Fregni; Rana Abdelnabi; Shi-Yan Caroline Foo; Paul W Rothlauf; Louis-Marie Bloyet; Fabio Benigni; Elisabetta Cameroni; Johan Neyts; Agostino Riva; Gyorgy Snell; Amalio Telenti; Sean P J Whelan; Herbert W Virgin; Davide Corti; Matteo Samuele Pizzuto; David Veesler
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Comprehensive mapping of mutations in the SARS-CoV-2 receptor-binding domain that affect recognition by polyclonal human plasma antibodies.

Authors:  Allison J Greaney; Andrea N Loes; Katharine H D Crawford; Tyler N Starr; Keara D Malone; Helen Y Chu; Jesse D Bloom
Journal:  Cell Host Microbe       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 21.023

6.  Defining the features and duration of antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 infection associated with disease severity and outcome.

Authors:  Katharina Röltgen; Abigail E Powell; Oliver F Wirz; Bryan A Stevens; Peter S Kim; Benjamin A Pinsky; Scott D Boyd; Catherine A Hogan; Javaria Najeeb; Molly Hunter; Hannah Wang; Malaya K Sahoo; ChunHong Huang; Fumiko Yamamoto; Monali Manohar; Justin Manalac; Ana R Otrelo-Cardoso; Tho D Pham; Arjun Rustagi; Angela J Rogers; Nigam H Shah; Catherine A Blish; Jennifer R Cochran; Theodore S Jardetzky; James L Zehnder; Taia T Wang; Balasubramanian Narasimhan; Saurabh Gombar; Robert Tibshirani; Kari C Nadeau
Journal:  Sci Immunol       Date:  2020-12-07

Review 7.  SARS-CoV-2 variants, spike mutations and immune escape.

Authors:  William T Harvey; Alessandro M Carabelli; Ben Jackson; Ravindra K Gupta; Emma C Thomson; Ewan M Harrison; Catherine Ludden; Richard Reeve; Andrew Rambaut; Sharon J Peacock; David L Robertson
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 78.297

8.  Infection and Vaccine-Induced Neutralizing-Antibody Responses to the SARS-CoV-2 B.1.617 Variants.

Authors:  Venkata-Viswanadh Edara; Benjamin A Pinsky; Mehul S Suthar; Lilin Lai; Meredith E Davis-Gardner; Katharine Floyd; Maria W Flowers; Jens Wrammert; Laila Hussaini; Caroline Rose Ciric; Sarah Bechnak; Kathy Stephens; Barney S Graham; Elham Bayat Mokhtari; Prakriti Mudvari; Eli Boritz; Adrian Creanga; Amarendra Pegu; Alexandrine Derrien-Colemyn; Amy R Henry; Matthew Gagne; Daniel C Douek; Malaya K Sahoo; Mamdouh Sibai; Daniel Solis; Richard J Webby; Trushar Jeevan; Thomas P Fabrizio
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Case-Control Study of Individuals with Discrepant Nucleocapsid and Spike Protein SARS-CoV-2 IgG Results.

Authors:  Hannah Wang; Danica Wiredja; Lu Yang; Philip L Bulterys; Cristina Costales; Katharina Röltgen; Justin Manalac; Jennifer Yee; James Zehnder; Run Zhang Shi; Scott D Boyd; Benjamin A Pinsky
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 8.327

  9 in total
  12 in total

Review 1.  Identifying Markers of Emerging SARS-CoV-2 Variants in Patients With Secondary Immunodeficiency.

Authors:  Nathan M Markarian; Gaël Galli; Dhanesh Patel; Mark Hemmings; Priya Nagpal; Albert M Berghuis; Levon Abrahamyan; Silvia M Vidal
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 6.064

2.  Emergence of SARS-CoV-2 Spike Mutations during Prolonged Infection in Immunocompromised Hosts.

Authors:  Karrie K K Ko; Hatairat Yingtaweesittikul; Thuan Tong Tan; Limin Wijaya; Delphine Yanhong Cao; Sui Sin Goh; Nurdyana Binte Abdul Rahman; Kenneth X L Chan; Hui Ming Tay; James Heng Chiak Sim; Kian Sing Chan; Lynette L E Oon; Niranjan Nagarajan; Chayaporn Suphavilai
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2022-05-11

Review 3.  Complexity of Viral Epitope Surfaces as Evasive Targets for Vaccines and Therapeutic Antibodies.

Authors:  Nathaniel L Miller; Rahul Raman; Thomas Clark; Ram Sasisekharan
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 8.786

4.  SARS-CoV-2 prolonged infection during advanced HIV disease evolves extensive immune escape.

Authors:  Sandile Cele; Farina Karim; Gila Lustig; James Emmanuel San; Tandile Hermanus; Houriiyah Tegally; Jumari Snyman; Thandeka Moyo-Gwete; Eduan Wilkinson; Mallory Bernstein; Khadija Khan; Shi-Hsia Hwa; Sasha W Tilles; Lavanya Singh; Jennifer Giandhari; Ntombifuthi Mthabela; Matilda Mazibuko; Yashica Ganga; Bernadett I Gosnell; Salim S Abdool Karim; Willem Hanekom; Wesley C Van Voorhis; Thumbi Ndung'u; Richard J Lessells; Penny L Moore; Mahomed-Yunus S Moosa; Tulio de Oliveira; Alex Sigal
Journal:  Cell Host Microbe       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 21.023

5.  SARS-CoV-2 evolved during advanced HIV disease immunosuppression has Beta-like escape of vaccine and Delta infection elicited immunity.

Authors:  Sandile Cele; Farina Karim; Gila Lustig; James Emmanuel San; Tandile Hermanus; Houriiyah Tegally; Jumari Snyman; Thandeka Moyo-Gwete; Eduan Wilkinson; Mallory Bernstein; Khadija Khan; Shi-Hsia Hwa; Sasha W Tilles; Lavanya Singh; Jennifer Giandhari; Ntombifuthi Mthabela; Matilda Mazibuko; Yashica Ganga; Bernadett I Gosnell; Salim Abdool Karim; Willem Hanekom; Wesley C Van Voorhis; Thumbi Ndung'u; Richard J Lessells; Penny L Moore; Mahomed-Yunus S Moosa; Tulio de Oliveira; Alex Sigal
Journal:  medRxiv       Date:  2021-12-07

6.  Comparing Immune Responses to Inactivated Vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 between People Living with HIV and HIV-Negative Individuals: A Cross-Sectional Study in China.

Authors:  Xiaojie Huang; Ying Yan; Bin Su; Dong Xiao; Maohe Yu; Xia Jin; Junyi Duan; Xiangjun Zhang; Shimin Zheng; Yuan Fang; Tong Zhang; Weiming Tang; Lunan Wang; Zixin Wang; Junjie Xu
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 5.048

7.  The repeated setbacks of HIV vaccine development laid the groundwork for SARS-CoV-2 vaccines.

Authors:  Jeffrey E Harris
Journal:  Health Policy Technol       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 5.211

8.  Viro-immunological evaluation in an immunocompromised patient with long-lasting SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Authors:  A Mancon; A Rizzo; D Mileto; S Grosso; A Foschi; M Cutrera; A Capetti; I Faggion; A Anselmo; A Monte; S Fillo; G Rizzardini; M R Gismondo; V Micheli
Journal:  Emerg Microbes Infect       Date:  2022-12       Impact factor: 7.163

9.  The COVID-19 Vaccination Still Matters: Omicron Variant Is a Final Wake-Up Call for the Rich to Help the Poor.

Authors:  Piotr Rzymski; Agnieszka Szuster-Ciesielska
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-03

10.  SARS-CoV-2 Evolution and Spike-Specific CD4+ T-Cell Response in Persistent COVID-19 with Severe HIV Immune Suppression.

Authors:  Hortensia Álvarez; Ezequiel Ruiz-Mateos; Pedro Miguel Juiz-González; Joana Vitallé; Irene Viéitez; María Del Carmen Vázquez-Friol; Isabel Torres-Beceiro; Alberto Pérez-Gómez; Pilar Gallego-García; Nuria Estévez-Gómez; Loretta De Chiara; Eva Poveda; David Posada; Josep M Llibre
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2022-01-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.