| Literature DB >> 34295831 |
Yongke Zhang1,2,3, Jinli Lyu4, Lan Ge5, Liting Huang1,2,3, Zhuobing Peng4, Yiheng Liang1,2,3, Xiaowei Zhang1,2,3, Shangrong Fan1,2,3.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of metronidazole and oral probiotics adjunct to metronidazole in the treatment of bacterial vaginosis (BV). One hundred and twenty-six Chinese women with BV were enrolled in this parallel, controlled trial, and were randomly assigned into two study arms: the metronidazole group, which was prescribed metronidazole vaginal suppositories for 7 days, and the adjunctive probiotic group, which received Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GR-1 and Limosilactobacillus reuteri RC-14 orally for 30 days as an adjunct to metronidazole. Clinical symptoms and Nugent scores at the initial visit, 30 days and 90 days were compared. There was no significant difference of the 30-day total cure rate between the adjunctive probiotic group (57.69%) and the metronidazole group (59.57%), with an odds ratio (OR) of 0.97 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.70 to 1.35, p-value = 0.04), or of the 90-day total cure rate (36.54% vs. 48.94%, OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.47 to 1.19; p-value = 0.213). Also, no significant difference of the vaginal and faecal microbial diversity and structure between the two groups at 0, 30 or 90 days were shown based on 16S rRNA sequences. The probiotic species were rarely detected in either the vaginal microbiota or the faecal microbiota after administration which may revealed the cause of noneffective of oral probiotics. No serious adverse effects were reported in the trial. The study indicated that oral probiotic adjunctive treatment did not increase the cure rate of Chinese BV patients compared to metronidazole.Entities:
Keywords: 16S rRNA sequencing; Chinese cohort; bacterial vaginosis; microbiota; probiotics
Year: 2021 PMID: 34295831 PMCID: PMC8291149 DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.669901
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cell Infect Microbiol ISSN: 2235-2988 Impact factor: 5.293
Figure 1Flow chart showing numbers of participants at each stage of the trial.
Demographic and clinical characteristics at baseline in the study population.
| Clinical characteristics | Value |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Adjunctive probiotic group (n=52) | Metronidazole group (n=47) | ||
| Age (years, mean ± SD) | 34.2 ± 7.0 | 33.3 ± 7.5 | 0.543 |
| Employment status, n (%) | |||
| Stable job | 43 (82.69) | 41 (87.23) | 0.5296 |
| Unemployed or unstable work | 9 (17.31) | 6 (12.77) | |
| Smoking history, n (%) | 5 (9.62) | 2 (4.26) | 0.3 |
| Current relationship status, n (%) | |||
| Married | 36 (69.23) | 26 (55.32) | 0.1536 |
| Single, divorced or others | 16 (30.77) | 21 (44.68) | |
| Childbirth history, n (%) | |||
| At least one previous birth | 31 (59.62) | 26 (55.32) | 0.666 |
| Never give birth before | 21 (40.38) | 21 (44.68) | |
| Sexual activity, n (%) | |||
| Regularly sexual activity (vaginal sex) which is at least 4 times per one month | 28 (53.85) | 20 (42.55) | 0.262 |
| Not had sexual activity in the last half of the year or vaginal sex less than 4 times per one month | 24 (46.15) | 27 (57.45) | |
| Condom using, n (%) | 24 (46.15) | 18 (38.30) | 0.4295 |
| Clinical symptoms or signs, n (%) | |||
| Thin, whitish, homogeneous vaginal discharge | 33 (63.46) | 30 (63.83) | 0.97 |
| Fishy smell or other bad Vaginal odour | 41 (78.85) | 40 (85.11) | 0.4186 |
| Itching | 29 (55.77) | 20 (42.55) | 0.1894 |
| Burning | 5 (9.62) | 7 (14.89) | 0.4228 |
| Laboratory test, n (%) | |||
| Vaginal pH (mean ± SD) | 5.05 ± 0.29 | 5.03 ± 0.30 | 0.7902 |
| Nugent score (mean ± SD) | 7.8 ± 0.87 | 8.0 ± 0.87 | 0.2907 |
Figure 2The percentage of the participants with detected BV-associated symptoms (abnormal vaginal discharge, abnormal vaginal odour, external genital itching and external genital burning) and laboratory parameters (vaginal pH ≥ 4.5 and Nugent score ≥ 7) at different time-point of the trial were shown. The number marked on the top of the bar denote the case number.
Figure 3The microbial diversity of the vaginal and fecal samples. The α-diversity of the vaginal (A) and fecal (B) microbiota presented by the box-plot of Shannon-Winner index. Wilcoxon test was used to do the statistical analysis of each two independent groups and Krustal test for multiple groups. The asterisks indicated the difference of multi-group. They denote the significant difference among all the three bars below. *stands for p-value < 0.05; ****stands for p-value < 0.0001. Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) of the vaginal (C) and fecal (D) samples was also performed. Each dot represents one individual sample, and the green ones stands for those collected at baseline, while red for 30 days and blue for 90 days.
Figure 4The microbial taxonomy of vaginal and fecal microbiota at genus and species level. Based on the 16S rRNA sequences, the vaginal (A) and fecal (C) bacterial genus with average relative abundance above 0.01, and bacterial species abundance above 0.01 detected from vaginal (B) and fecal (D) microbiota were also shown. MV0, MV30 and MV90 represent the vaginal samples collected at 0-day, 30-day and 90-day in the metronidazole group, respectively. MF0, MF30 and MF90 represent the fecal samples collected at 0-day, 30-day and 90-day in the metronidazole group, respectively. APV0, APV30 and APV90 represent the vaginal samples collected at 0-day, 30-day and 90-day in the adjunctive probiotic group, respectively. APF0, APF30 and APF90 represent the fecal samples collected at 0-day, 30-day and 90-day in the adjunctive probiotic group, respectively.
Figure 5The abundance of the top abundant bacterial species and key Lactobacillus species in vaginal microbiota. The relative abundances of bacterial species with abundance above 0.01 in the vaginal environment of BV patients have been evaluated (A). The relative abundance of vaginal dominant Lactobacillus species (B), including L. crispatus, L. gasseri and L. iners, as well as the intervention probiotic species (L. rhamnosus and L. reuteri) in the vaginal microbiota (B) have also been explained. Wilcoxon test was used to do the statistical analysis of each two independent groups, and p-value was noted by stars above the bars. *stands for p-value < 0.05; **stands for p-value < 0.01; ***stands for p-value < 0.001.
Figure 6The hierarchical cluster of the vaginal and fecal microbiota of the participates at 0-day. The heatmap of the hierarchical cluster analysis of the bacterial species with relative abundance above 0.001 in vaginal (A) and fecal (C) microbiota of each participants. The colour was corresponded with the colour bar at right side defined by log of the relative abundance. The left bar was represented the cure (red) and non-cure (blue) outcome of the participants. The relative abundance of the bacterial species above 0.01 in vaginal microbiota in cure group and non-cure group, and their multiple relationship were also calculated (B). The number marked at the end of the bar in the upper plot was the mean relative abundance, and the number in the lower plot was the fold change. Wilcoxon test was used to do the statistical analysis of each two independent groups, and p-value was noted by stars above the bars. *stands for p-value < 0.05; **stands for p-value < 0.01.