Henry Zakumumpa1, Kimani Makobu2, Wilbrod Ntawiha3, Everd Maniple4. 1. Makerere University, School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda. 2. Kenya Medical Research Institute-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya. 3. National Social Security Fund, Kampala, Uganda. 4. Kabale University, School of Medicine, Kabale, Uganda.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Since 2017, Uganda has been implementing five differentiated antiretroviral therapy (ART) delivery models to improve the quality of HIV care and to achieve health-system efficiencies. Community-based models include Community Client-Led ART Delivery and Community Drug Distribution Points. Facility-based models include Fast Track Drug Refill, Facility Based Group and Facility Based Individual Management. We set out to assess the extent of uptake of these ART delivery models and to describe barriers to uptake of either facility-based or community-based models. METHODS: Between December 2019 and February 2020, we conducted a mixed-methods study entailing a cross-sectional health facility survey (n = 116) and in-depth interviews (n = 16) with ART clinic managers in ten case-study facilities as well as six focus group discussions (56 participants) with patients enrolled in differentiated ART models. Facilities were selected based on the 10 geographic sub-regions of Uganda. Statistical analyses were performed in STATA (v13) while qualitative data were analysed by thematic approach. RESULTS: Most facilities 63 (57%) commenced implementation of differentiated ART delivery in 2018. Fast Track Drug Delivery was the most common facility-based model (implemented in 100 or 86% of health facilities). Community Client-Led ART Delivery was the most popular community model (63/116 or 54%). Community Drug Distribution Points had the lowest uptake with only 33 (24.88%) facilities implementing them. By ownership-type, for-profit facilities reported the lowest uptake of differentiated ART models. Barriers to enrolment in community-based models include HIV-related stigma and low enrolment of adult males in community models. CONCLUSION: To the best of our knowledge this is the first study reporting national coverage of differentiated ART delivery models in Uganda. Overall, there has been a higher uptake of facility-based models. Interventions for enhancing the uptake of differentiated ART models in for-profit facilities are recommended.
INTRODUCTION: Since 2017, Uganda has been implementing five differentiated antiretroviral therapy (ART) delivery models to improve the quality of HIV care and to achieve health-system efficiencies. Community-based models include Community Client-Led ART Delivery and Community Drug Distribution Points. Facility-based models include Fast Track Drug Refill, Facility Based Group and Facility Based Individual Management. We set out to assess the extent of uptake of these ART delivery models and to describe barriers to uptake of either facility-based or community-based models. METHODS: Between December 2019 and February 2020, we conducted a mixed-methods study entailing a cross-sectional health facility survey (n = 116) and in-depth interviews (n = 16) with ART clinic managers in ten case-study facilities as well as six focus group discussions (56 participants) with patients enrolled in differentiated ART models. Facilities were selected based on the 10 geographic sub-regions of Uganda. Statistical analyses were performed in STATA (v13) while qualitative data were analysed by thematic approach. RESULTS: Most facilities 63 (57%) commenced implementation of differentiated ART delivery in 2018. Fast Track Drug Delivery was the most common facility-based model (implemented in 100 or 86% of health facilities). Community Client-Led ART Delivery was the most popular community model (63/116 or 54%). Community Drug Distribution Points had the lowest uptake with only 33 (24.88%) facilities implementing them. By ownership-type, for-profit facilities reported the lowest uptake of differentiated ART models. Barriers to enrolment in community-based models include HIV-related stigma and low enrolment of adult males in community models. CONCLUSION: To the best of our knowledge this is the first study reporting national coverage of differentiated ART delivery models in Uganda. Overall, there has been a higher uptake of facility-based models. Interventions for enhancing the uptake of differentiated ART models in for-profit facilities are recommended.
Authors: Jill Olivier; Clarence Tsimpo; Regina Gemignani; Mari Shojo; Harold Coulombe; Frank Dimmock; Minh Cong Nguyen; Harrison Hines; Edward J Mills; Joseph L Dieleman; Annie Haakenstad; Quentin Wodon Journal: Lancet Date: 2015-07-06 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Chris Duncombe; Scott Rosenblum; Nicholas Hellmann; Charles Holmes; Lynne Wilkinson; Marc Biot; Helen Bygrave; David Hoos; Geoff Garnett Journal: Trop Med Int Health Date: 2015-02-16 Impact factor: 2.622
Authors: Marcel Yotebieng; Ellen Brazier; Diane Addison; April D Kimmel; Morna Cornell; Olivia Keiser; Angela M Parcesepe; Amobi Onovo; Kathryn E Lancaster; Barbara Castelnuovo; Pamela M Murnane; Craig R Cohen; Rachel C Vreeman; Mary-Ann Davies; Stephany N Duda; Constantin T Yiannoutsos; Rose S Bono; Robert Agler; Charlotte Bernard; Jennifer L Syvertsen; Jean d'Amour Sinayobye; Radhika Wikramanayake; Annette H Sohn; Per M von Groote; Gilles Wandeler; Valeriane Leroy; Carolyn F Williams; Kara Wools-Kaloustian; Denis Nash Journal: J Int AIDS Soc Date: 2019-01 Impact factor: 5.396
Authors: Miriam Rabkin; Michael Strauss; Joanne E Mantell; Munyaradzi Mapingure; Tsitsi B Masvawure; Matthew R Lamb; Jennifer M Zech; Godfrey Musuka; Innocent Chingombe; Martin Msukwa; Rodrigo Boccanera; Clorata Gwanzura; Gavin George; Tsitsi Apollo Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-01-28 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Noelle Le Tourneau; Ashley Germann; Ryan R Thompson; Nathan Ford; Sheree Schwartz; Laura Beres; Aaloke Mody; Stefan Baral; Elvin H Geng; Ingrid Eshun-Wilson Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2022-03-22 Impact factor: 11.069