Candida auris is an emerging, often multidrug-resistant yeast that is highly transmissible, resulting in health care–associated outbreaks, especially in long-term care facilities. Skin colonization with C. auris allows spread and leads to invasive infections, including bloodstream infections, in 5%–10% of colonized patients (). Three major classes of antifungal medications exist for treating invasive infections: azoles (e.g., fluconazole), polyenes (e.g., amphotericin B), and echinocandins. Approximately 85% of C. auris isolates in the United States are resistant to azoles, 33% to amphotericin B, and 1% to echinocandins (), based on tentative susceptibility breakpoints.* Echinocandins are thus critical for treatment of C. auris infections and are recommended as first-line therapy for most invasive Candida infections (). Echinocandin resistance is a concerning clinical and public health threat, particularly when coupled with resistance to azole and amphotericin B (pan-resistance).Pan-resistant C. auris isolates have been reported previously, although rarely, from the United States () and other countries (). Three pan-resistant C. auris cases reported in New York developed resistance following echinocandin treatment and lacked epidemiologic links or common health care (), suggesting that resistance resulted from antifungal pressure rather than via person-to-person transmission. Since January 2021, however, the Antibiotic Resistance Laboratory Network has detected independent clusters of pan-resistant or echinocandin-resistant cases in Texas and the District of Columbia (DC). Each cluster involved common health care encounters and no known previous echinocandin exposure, suggesting transmission of pan- and echinocandin-resistant strains for the first time in the United States.Among 101 clinical and screening cases of C. auris in DC during January–April 2021, three had an isolate that was pan-resistant. All resistant isolates were identified through skin colonization screening at one long-term care facility for severely ill patients, including those requiring mechanical ventilation.Among 22 clinical and screening cases of C. auris in Texas during the same period, two were pan-resistant and five were resistant to both echinocandins and fluconazole. These seven cases were identified in patients who were cared for at two facilities that share patients in the same city; two patients were at a long-term acute care hospital, three at a short-term acute care hospital, and two at both facilities. Among these cases, four were identified through colonization screening and three through clinical isolates (two blood isolates and one wound isolate).No known epidemiologic links were identified between the Texas and DC clusters. No patients with pan- or echinocandin-resistant isolates in either cluster had received echinocandins before C. auris specimen collection. Thirty-day mortality in both outbreaks combined was 30%, but the relative contribution of C. auris was unclear.These two simultaneous, independent clusters of pan- or echinocandin-resistant C. auris cases in patients with overlapping inpatient health care exposures and without previous echinocandin use provide the first evidence suggesting that pan- or echinocandin-resistant C. auris strains might have been transmitted in U.S. health care settings. Surveillance, public health reporting, and infection control measures are critical to containing further spread. Clinicians should consider early antifungal susceptibility testing in patients with C. auris infection, especially in those with treatment failure. Data are lacking about the most appropriate therapy for pan-resistant infections. Combination and investigational antifungal treatments can be considered, but evidence in clinical settings is limited (). More information is needed to evaluate patient outcomes and identify proper treatment for C. auris cases with pan-resistance or echinocandin resistance.
Authors: Shawn R Lockhart; Kizee A Etienne; Snigdha Vallabhaneni; Joveria Farooqi; Anuradha Chowdhary; Nelesh P Govender; Arnaldo Lopes Colombo; Belinda Calvo; Christina A Cuomo; Christopher A Desjardins; Elizabeth L Berkow; Mariana Castanheira; Rindidzani E Magobo; Kauser Jabeen; Rana J Asghar; Jacques F Meis; Brendan Jackson; Tom Chiller; Anastasia P Litvintseva Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2016-10-20 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Peter G Pappas; Carol A Kauffman; David R Andes; Cornelius J Clancy; Kieren A Marr; Luis Ostrosky-Zeichner; Annette C Reboli; Mindy G Schuster; Jose A Vazquez; Thomas J Walsh; Theoklis E Zaoutis; Jack D Sobel Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2015-12-16 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Samantha E Jacobs; Jonathan L Jacobs; Emily K Dennis; Sarah Taimur; Meenakshi Rana; Dhruv Patel; Melissa Gitman; Gopi Patel; Sarah Schaefer; Kishore Iyer; Jang Moon; Victoria Adams; Polina Lerner; Thomas J Walsh; YanChun Zhu; Mohammed Rokebul Anower; Mayuri M Vaidya; Sudha Chaturvedi; Vishnu Chaturvedi Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2022-06-30 Impact factor: 5.938
Authors: Benjamin Williamson; Adam Wilk; Kevin D Guerrero; Timothy D Mikulski; Tony N Elias; Indira Sawh; Geselle Cancino-Prado; Dianne Gardam; Christopher H Heath; Nelesh P Govender; David S Perlin; Milena Kordalewska; Kelley R Healey Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2021-10-11 Impact factor: 5.938
Authors: Tomye L Ollinger; Bao Vu; Daniel Murante; Josie E Parker; Lucia Simonicova; Laura Doorley; Mark A Stamnes; Steven L Kelly; P David Rogers; W Scott Moye-Rowley; Damian J Krysan Journal: mSphere Date: 2021-12-22 Impact factor: 4.389
Authors: Lina Reslan; George F Araj; Marc Finianos; Rima El Asmar; Jaroslav Hrabak; Ghassan Dbaibo; Ibrahim Bitar Journal: Front Microbiol Date: 2022-01-25 Impact factor: 5.640