Literature DB >> 34292368

Real-world data and treatment patterns of patients with lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia in Germany: an observational study using health insurance claims data.

Arkadiusz Miernik1, Jonas Fritzsche2, Berit Libutzki3,4, Vanessa Malka5, Ido Kilemnik5, Damon Mohebbi6, Melanie May6, Christian Gratzke1, Rodrigo Suarez-Ibarrola1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is associated with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), representing one of the most common urological conditions. However, insights into the actual healthcare of this patient cohort in Germany are scarce. We aimed to retrospectively analyse management patterns of patients with LUTS in Germany using health insurance claims databases.
METHODS: A retrospective, longitudinal cohort analysis was conducted obtaining claims data from the German InGef health insurance database containing approximately five million member-records from over 60 nationwide statutory health insurances. First, a cross-sectional prevalence analysis was performed on all individuals with a diagnosis on LUTS (ICD-10 GM N40) in 2018. Second, a longitudinal analysis of individuals with either a newly started BPH medication or initial BPH surgery who were indexed in 2014 and followed-up for 4 years.
RESULTS: In 2018, 132,386 (6.7%) prevalent BPH patients were identified from 1,979,916 continuously insured males. A potential overcoding bias could not be assessed which may influence the outpatient sector estimation. 10,361 (0.7%) patients were identified with incident BPH medication and 1768 (0.1%) patients with incident BPH surgery out of 1,575,604 males (2013-2018). Alpha-blockers were the drug of choice (95.6%) in the first year. Half of patients received specific BPH medications four years after index, while almost 98% of initial BPH surgeries were performed within the inpatient setting. TURP was the most frequent surgical intervention (76%).
CONCLUSIONS: A widespread diffusion of alternative individualized minimally invasive approaches in the outpatient sector might address pharmacotherapy discontinuation and patient-access barriers to other treatments.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BPH; Delivery of health care [MeSH]; Drug therapy [MeSH]; Health insurance [MeSH]; Minimally invasive surgical procedures [MeSH]; Prostatic hyperplasia [MeSH]

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34292368     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-021-03787-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  13 in total

1.  Can benign prostatic hyperplasia be identified in the primary care setting using only simple tests? Results of the Diagnosis IMprovement in PrimAry Care Trial.

Authors:  J Carballido; R Fourcade; A Pagliarulo; F Brenes; A Boye; A Sessa; M Gilson; R Castro
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  The Utilization of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia and Bladder-Related Medications After a Transurethral Prostatectomy.

Authors:  Jeffrey Campbell; Jennifer Reid; Michael Ordon; Blayne Welk
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 2.649

3.  National trends in surgical therapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia in the United States (2000-2008).

Authors:  Bahaa S Malaeb; Xinhua Yu; A Marshall McBean; Sean P Elliott
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  Drug adherence and clinical outcomes for patients under pharmacological therapy for lower urinary tract symptoms related to benign prostatic hyperplasia: population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Luca Cindolo; Luisella Pirozzi; Caterina Fanizza; Marilena Romero; Andrea Tubaro; Riccardo Autorino; Cosimo De Nunzio; Luigi Schips
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  Factors associated with continuing medical therapy after transurethral resection of prostate.

Authors:  Hyun Ho Han; Woo Jin Ko; Tag Keun Yoo; Tae Hee Oh; Duk Yoon Kim; Dong Deuk Kwon; Seok-Soo Byun; Sun Il Kim; Tae Young Jung
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Characteristics and external validity of the German Health Risk Institute (HRI) Database.

Authors:  Frank Andersohn; Jochen Walker
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 2.890

Review 7.  Benign prostatic hyperplasia: epidemiology, economics and evaluation.

Authors:  Camille Vuichoud; Kevin R Loughlin
Journal:  Can J Urol       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.344

Review 8.  Patient centred care for the medical treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms in patients with benign prostatic obstruction: a key point to improve patients' care - a systematic review.

Authors:  Cosimo De Nunzio; Fabrizio Presicce; Riccardo Lombardo; Alberto Trucchi; Mariangela Bellangino; Andrea Tubaro; Egidio Moja
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 2.264

9.  Analysis of Present Status for Surgery of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia in Korea Using Nationwide Healthcare System Data.

Authors:  Byeong Jo Jeon; Hong Chung; Jae Hyun Bae; Han Jung; Jeong Gu Lee; Hoon Choi
Journal:  Int Neurourol J       Date:  2019-03-31       Impact factor: 2.835

Review 10.  Update on minimally invasive surgery and benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Authors:  Amanda S J Chung; Henry H Woo
Journal:  Asian J Urol       Date:  2017-06-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.