Literature DB >> 21733048

Can benign prostatic hyperplasia be identified in the primary care setting using only simple tests? Results of the Diagnosis IMprovement in PrimAry Care Trial.

J Carballido1, R Fourcade, A Pagliarulo, F Brenes, A Boye, A Sessa, M Gilson, R Castro.   

Abstract

AIMS: Diagnosis IMprovement in PrimAry Care Trial (D-IMPACT) was a prospective, multicentre epidemiological study in three European countries to identify the optimal subset of simple tests applied in primary care to diagnose benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) in men who spontaneously present with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS).
METHODS: Consecutive male patients aged ≥ 50 years who spontaneously attended their regular general practitioner (GP) office with LUTS were eligible for inclusion if they had not previously undergone BPH diagnostic tests or received treatment for BPH. Patients were assessed on three occasions, twice by their regular GP (visits 1 and 2) and once by a urologist (visit 3). The diagnostic accuracy of each variable was determined using the urologists' final BPH diagnosis (at visit 3) as gold-standard. Independent variables analysed were as follows: age; BPH diagnosis performed by GP in visit 1 (yes/no); probability of BPH diagnosis assessed by GP in visit 1; urinalysis (normal/abnormal); prostate-specific antigen (PSA); International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS); diagnosis of BPH performed by GP in visit 2 (yes/no); and probability of BPH diagnosis assessed by GP in visit 2. Statistically significant variables (p < 0.1) were included in a logistic regression model to identify the best algorithm and describe each test contribution.
RESULTS: The most frequent spontaneously reported LUTS were nocturia and weak urinary stream. BPH study prevalence was 66.0% (95%CI: 62.3-69.5) and 32% of patients were at risk of BPH progression (PSA > 1.5 ng/ml and prostate volume ≥ 30 cm(3)). Among the independent variables analysed, only age, IPSS and PSA showed a statistically significant relationship with BPH diagnosis. In a logistic regression model including age, IPSS, PSA and probability of BPH (based on physical examination and symptoms), positive predictive value (PPV) was 77.1%. Exclusion of BPH probability resulted in a PPV of 75.7%.
CONCLUSIONS: A diagnostic algorithm including only objective variables (age, IPSS and PSA), easily implemented in any GP office, allows GPs to accurately diagnose BPH in approximately three-quarters of patients spontaneously reporting LUTS.
© 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21733048     DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2011.02735.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Pract        ISSN: 1368-5031            Impact factor:   2.503


  8 in total

Review 1.  The evaluation and treatment of prostate-related LUTS in the primary care setting: the next STEP.

Authors:  Matt T Rosenberg; David Staskin; John Riley; Grannum Sant; Martin Miner
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 2.  Pelvic ultrasound evaluation for benign prostatic hyperplasia: prediction of obstruction.

Authors:  Daniel B Rukstalis
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Reliability and validity of assessment methods available in primary care for bladder outlet obstruction and benign prostatic obstruction in men with lower urinary tract symptoms: a systematic review.

Authors:  Tom Vredeveld; Esther van Benten; Rikie E P M Beekmans; M Patrick Koops; Johannes C F Ket; Jurgen Mollema; Stephan P J Ramaekers; Jan J M Pool; Michel W Coppieters; Annelies L Pool-Goudzwaard
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 3.006

4.  Real-world data and treatment patterns of patients with lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia in Germany: an observational study using health insurance claims data.

Authors:  Arkadiusz Miernik; Jonas Fritzsche; Berit Libutzki; Vanessa Malka; Ido Kilemnik; Damon Mohebbi; Melanie May; Christian Gratzke; Rodrigo Suarez-Ibarrola
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Validation of Self-Management Screening (SeMaS), a tool to facilitate personalised counselling and support of patients with chronic diseases.

Authors:  Nathalie Eikelenboom; Ivo Smeele; Marjan Faber; Annelies Jacobs; Frank Verhulst; Joyca Lacroix; Michel Wensing; Jan van Lieshout
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 2.497

6.  Management of male lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia by general practitioners in Jakarta.

Authors:  Faisal Abdi Matondang; Harrina Erlianti Rahardjo
Journal:  Prostate Int       Date:  2014-06-30

7.  Correlations of Metabolic Components with Prostate Volume in Middle-Aged Men Receiving Health Check-Up.

Authors:  Teng-Kai Yang; Peter Woo; Hung-Ju Yang; Hong-Chiang Chang; Ju-Ton Hsieh; Kuo-How Huang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Real-world assessment and characteristics of men with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) in primary care and urology clinics in Spain.

Authors:  José María Molero; Bernardino Miñana; Juan Manuel Palacios-Moreno; Miguel Téllez Martínez-Fornes; David Lorite Mingot; Alfonso Agra Rolán; Ágata Carreño; Rafael Cuervo Pinto
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2020-08-16       Impact factor: 3.149

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.