Literature DB >> 34291673

The Association of Coagulation Indicators and Coagulant Agents With 30-Day Mortality of Critical Diabetics.

Yingxin Huang1, Zhihua Zhong2, Fanna Liu1.   

Abstract

Diabetes, regarded as a global health concerned disease, was focused by the World Health Organization (WHO). Patients with diabetes may have a hypercoagulable and hypo-fibrinolysis state. There is lots of research about cardiovascular effects on diabetes patients, but less about the coagulation system. This study is designed to investigate the relationship between coagulation indicators and 30-day mortality of critical diabetes patients. In this retrospective, single-center study, we included adult patients diagnosed with diabetes. Data, including demographic, complication, laboratory tests, scoring system, and anticoagulant treatment, were extracted from Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC-III). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and Kaplan-Meier curve were applied to predict the association of mortality and coagulation indicators. Cox hazard regression model and subgroup analysis were used to analyze the risk factors associated with 30-day mortality. A total of 4026 patients with diabetes mellitus were included in our study, of whom 3312 survived after admitted to the hospital and 714 died. Cox hazard regression showed anticoagulant therapy might decrease the risk of 30-day mortality after adjusted. In age <70 subgroup analysis, we found that patients with PTT <26.8 s or lightly increased PT may increase odds of 30-day hospital death (HR, 95%CI, 2.044 (1.376, 3.034), 1.562 (1.042, 2.343)). When age >70, lightly increased PTT may reduce the risk of mortality, but PT >16.3 s, a high level of hypo-coagulation state, increase risk of mortality (HR, 95%CI, 0.756 (0.574, 0.996), 1.756 (1.129, 2.729)). Critical diabetes patients may benefit from anticoagulant agents. The abnormal coagulant function is related to the risk of 30-day mortality.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MIMIC; anticoagulants; blood coagulation; diabetes mellitus; mortality

Year:  2021        PMID: 34291673      PMCID: PMC8312190          DOI: 10.1177/10760296211026385

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Appl Thromb Hemost        ISSN: 1076-0296            Impact factor:   2.389


Introduction

Worldwide, the prevalence rate of diabetes is rising year by year. In 2017, the global prevalence in adults was 8.8% of the world population, and the total number was 424.9 million worldwide. Experts estimated that the population would have a 48% increase to 628.6 million by 2045. The typical diabetes mellitus (DM) pathological changes are the thickening of the micro-vessel basement membrane and the disturbance of microcirculation. Microangiopathy is a specific complication of DM which can involve vital organs. Microvascular or macrovascular complications will happen to diabetes patients sooner or later. Microvascular complications include chronic kidney disease, albuminuria, retinopathy, autonomic neuropathy, peripheral neuropathy and erectile dysfunction. Macrovascular complications include coronary artery disease, stroke, transient ischemic attack, carotid artery stenting, carotid endarterectomy, peripheral artery disease, diabetic foot, amputation and heart failure. The global prevalence of microvascular and macrovascular complications was 18% and 13%, respectively. Therefore, DM causes multiple organ injury. The most frequently involved organs are kidney and retina, especially. Clotting factors are elevated in DM patients, such as fibrinogen, factor VII, factor VIII, factor XI, factor XII, von Willebrand factor and kallikrein. On the contrary, plasma protein C is decline. Some research observed that pro-coagulation biomarker or D-dimer is increased in diabetes patients with microvascular and macrovascular complications. Chronic hyperglycemia leads to the abnormality of vascular. Moreover, a pro-inflammatory and a procoagulant state can result in endothelial dysfunction. Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus have a hypercoagulable and hypo-fibrinolysis state. And the activation of coagulation may contribute to the increased risk of vascular disease. The activation of aldose reductase, polyol pathway and advanced glycation-end-product formation in DM patients, affects the phosphorylation status and expression of endothelial nitric oxide synthetase, a potent vasodilator that possesses vasodilatory, antiplatelet aggregatory, anti-atherogenic and antifibrinolytic. In mimic-III database, a study found 10 laboratory tests with the strongest association with mortality. Interestingly, 4 out of 10 are related to coagulation function included partial thromboplastin time (PTT), platelet, total calcium, and INR, respectively. Thus, this study aimed to analyze the association of coagulation indicators with 30-day hospital mortality of diabetes patients at ICU admission.

Methods

Database

The data were acquired from a public and freely available clinical database, MIMIC-III. An extensive and single-center database includes over 38000 ICU patients with their demographic characteristics, diagnosis by ICD-9 codes, physiological index, laboratory tests and medications, admitted to the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston during 2001-2012. After completing the National Institutes of Health’s Web-based course and passing Protecting Human Research Participants exam, can we apply for the data. The data of identification were hidden to protect privacy.

Data Extraction

Structured query language (SQL) with PostgreSQL (version 9.6) and open-source development were used to extract MIMIC-III database data. Demographics, laboratory tests, diagnosis, comorbidities, scoring systems, and medication in the first 24 h of ICU admission were collected. Age, body mass index (BMI, weight (kg) /[height(m)]2]), gender and ethnicity were extracted as demographics characteristic. Main coagulation parameters were collected in our study, including PTT, international normalized ratio (INR) and prothrombin time (PT). Other laboratory data were also extracted, including albumin (Alb), total bilirubin (TBIL), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine (Crea), bicarbonate, calcium, glucose (Mean blood glucose level), lactic acid, pH, hematocrit, hemoglobin, red blood cell distribution width (RDW), platelet and white blood cell (WBC). Besides, comorbidities included congestive heart failure (CHF), coronary artery disease (CAD), hypertension, chronic kidney disease (CKD), liver disease, malignancy. Sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score, simplified acute physiology score II (SAPS II) and systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) were calculated for each patient as the severity of illness index. Moreover, our study collected DM patients who received anticoagulants or renal replacement therapy. The following drugs were defined as anticoagulants: heparin, low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), fondaparinux sodium, argatroban, dicoumarol, warfarin, dabigatran, rivaroxaban. Furthermore, the endpoints of our study were 30-day all-cause mortality from the date of ICU admission.

Population Select Criteria and Outcome

All patients were initially diagnosed with DM according to the International Classification of Disease (ICD)-9 code (code = 250) or diagnosed with DM during hospitalization following by clinical diagnosis of ADA. Patients with the following condition were excluded in our study: (1) age lower than 18 years old; (2) less than 48 hours in ICU; (3) the absence of INR and PTT within 24 hours after ICU admission; (4) only the first ICU stay was considered for patients who admitted more than once. The outcomes of our study were defined as 30-day hospital mortality.

Statistical Analysis

Descriptive statistics included proportions and frequencies for categorical variables and mean ± standard deviation (SD) for continuous variables. Chi-square test and the Kruskal-Wallis test were used for comparison. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was applied to measure the sensitivity and specificity of PT, PTT, INR and scoring system in 30-day mortality. The area under the curve (AUC) was also calculated to confirm the quality of coagulation indexes as a predictor of mortality. In order to figure out the relationship between PT, PTT, INR, anticoagulants and 30-day mortality, Kaplan-Meier survival curves (KM) were generated. Moreover, we used Cox regression hazard model to analyze the association between coagulation indexes, anticoagulants and 30-day mortality. To further understand the relationship of coagulation indexes, anticoagulants and 30-day mortality, a subgroup analysis was conducted classified by age, gender, scoring system, CKD and malignancy. P-value < 0.05 was defined as statistically significant.

Results

Characteristic of the Subjects

Among 46476 ICU admission patients, a total of 4026 ICU inpatients with DM were enrolled in our study and 42450 were excluded (as shown in Figure 1).
Figure 1.

Flow chart.

Flow chart. The demographic characteristics were displayed in Table 1. Compared to 3312 who survived in our study, 714 of 4026 died after discharge from the hospital in 30 days. The mean age of the former was 74.6 ± 43.6 years old and the latter was 89.7 ± 63.6. The non-survivors were older and stayed longer than the survivors. And there was no difference in gender. We also found that the non-survivors gained high scores in SAPS-II and SOFA, paralleled to mortality. Interestingly, as shown in Table 1, the non-survivor patients were in hypercoagulable state. And whether used anticoagulants were statistically insignificant in survivor and non-survivor patients.
Table 1.

Baseline Characteristics.a

Characteristics30-day non-survivors, n = 71430-day survivors, n = 3312 P value
Age, years89.74563.63574.59443.5710.000
BMI34.910156.89232.66775.7270.568
Gender, n (%)
 Female3100.07713720.3410.349
 Male4040.10019400.4820.349
Ethnicity, n (%)
 White4660.11622080.5480.500
 Black110.003790.0200.213
 Yellow550.0143280.0810.081
 Others1820.0456970.1730.011
 Days of ICU(h)8.2538.6426.2156.8240.000
Scoring systems
 SAPS-II47.76914.60037.15512.5670.000
 SOFA6.2653.8524.6002.9030.000
SIRS, n (%)
 040.001430.0110.141
 1320.0082730.0680.001
 21260.0317580.1880.003
 32850.07112840.3190.597
 42670.0669540.2370.000
Coagulation parameters
 PTT(s)42.82928.36538.20122.9160.000
 INR1.6701.0261.4700.8470.000
 PT(s)17.2146.93015.6206.3250.000
Others laboratory parameters
 Albumin2.9390.6063.2332.6710.003
 TBIL2.82513.7071.3161.5630.000
 Urea nitrogen37.89825.72927.48520.2490.000
 Creatinine1.6841.2921.3541.2600.000
 Bicarbonate22.4035.25623.8744.8230.000
 Calcium8.1950.9148.3290.8300.000
 Glu186.35489.600180.48788.9650.111
 Lactic acid2.7752.1172.2781.2770.000
 pH6.9160.9007.0121.7580.153
 Hematocrit31.8376.23531.8736.2680.890
 Hemoglobin10.4602.15710.4982.2020.674
 RDW15.8682.39114.8201.7670.000
 Platelet216.337117.645214.695102.5860.706
 WBC13.96211.75512.74311.4490.010
Comorbidities, n (%)
Chronic heart disease0.105
 04400.10921500.534
 12740.06811620.289
Cardiac dysrhythmia0.270
 06850.17031420.780
 1290.0071700.042
Hypertension0.001
 03310.08213140.326
 13830.09519980.496
Chronic kidney disease0.033
 06070.15129150.724
 11070.0273970.099
Liver disease0.065
 06970.17332670.811
 1170.004450.011
Malignancy0.000
 05220.13027220.676
 11920.0485900.147
Anticoagulant0.710
 01440.0366450.160
 15700.14226670.662
Renal replacement therapy0.000
 06730.16732270.802
 1410.010850.021

Abbreviations: BMI, Body Mass Index; ICU, intensive care unit; SAPS-II, Simplified Acute Physiology Score II; SOFA, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment; SIRS, Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome; PTT, Partial Thromboplastin Time; PT, Prothrombin Time; INR, International Normalized Ratio; TBIL, Total Bilirubin; GLU, Glucose; RDW, Red Blood Cell; WBC, White Blood Cell; Anticoagulant, Using heparin, low molecular weight heparin, fondaparinux sodium, argatroban, dicoumarol, warfarin, dabigatran, rivaroxaban.

a Continue data are presented as mean ± SD and categorical variables are presented as n (%).

Baseline Characteristics.a Abbreviations: BMI, Body Mass Index; ICU, intensive care unit; SAPS-II, Simplified Acute Physiology Score II; SOFA, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment; SIRS, Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome; PTT, Partial Thromboplastin Time; PT, Prothrombin Time; INR, International Normalized Ratio; TBIL, Total Bilirubin; GLU, Glucose; RDW, Red Blood Cell; WBC, White Blood Cell; Anticoagulant, Using heparin, low molecular weight heparin, fondaparinux sodium, argatroban, dicoumarol, warfarin, dabigatran, rivaroxaban. a Continue data are presented as mean ± SD and categorical variables are presented as n (%).

ROC and KM Curve

The ROC curve (Figure 2) shows that SAPS II (AUC = 0.7344) is of better predicting ability than SOFA (AUC = 0.654), PT (AUC = 0.5939), INR (AUC = 0.5874), SIRS (AUC = 0.5812) and PTT (AUC = 0.5563), as an overall scoring system to estimate the severity of disease,
Figure 2.

ROC curve.

ROC curve. The continuous variables of coagulation values were converted to categorical variables by quartiles derived from clinical experience. The Kaplan-Meier survival curve of APTT shown a U-shaped relationship with 30-day mortality (Figure 3). Besides, INR and PT’s KM curve revealed that the higher INR or PT, the greater mortality. However, there was no statistical difference whether had anticoagulants according to KM curve of agents.
Figure 3.

KM curve of PTT, PT, and INR.

KM curve of PTT, PT, and INR.

COX Hazard Regression

To examine the independent predicting value, 714 non-survivors and 3312 survivors were included in 2 models: non-adjusted and adjusted models (Table 2). The later model was adjusted for demographic characteristics (age, gender, ethnicity, BMI), scoring systems (SOFA, SIRS, SAPS II), comorbidities (cardiac dysrhythmia disease, congestive heart failure, hypertension, CKD, liver disease, malignancy), laboratory parameters (albumin, bicarbonate, calcium, creatinine, glucose, hematocrit, hemoglobin, lactic acid, pH, platelet, RDW, TBIL, urea nitrogen, WBC) and therapy (RRT and anticoagulants).
Table 2.

HRs of Coagulation Indicator, Coagulant Drug, and 30-Day Mortality in Different Models.

OutcomeNon-adjusteda Adjustb
HR P HR P
PTT
16.9-26.81.180 (0.941, 1.478)0.1511.334 (1.058, 1.681)0.015
26.8-31.311
31.3-39.60.927 (0.743, 1.156)0.5000.902 (0.721, 1.129)0.368
39.6-150.01.221 (0.987, 1.511)0.0661.138 (0.913, 1.420)0.251
PT
9.2-13.211
13.2-14.31.405 (1.118, 1.766)0.0041.312 (1.039, 1.657)0.022
14.3-16.31.397 (1.074, 1.817)0.0131.284 (0.973, 1.694)0.077
16.3-150.02.093 (1.511, 2.900)0.0001.455 (1.033, 2.049)0.032
INR
0.0-1.111
1.1-1.30.971 (0.765, 1.233)0.8090.985 (0.775, 1.253)0.904
1.3-1.60.919 (0.742, 1.137)0.4360.886 (0.709, 1.107)0.285
1.6-22.61.069 (0.794, 1.439)0.6600.969 (0.713, 1.316)0.838
Use drug0.928 (0.770, 1.118)0.4290.710 (0.585, 0.862)0.001

a The non-adjusted model adjusts for none.

b The adjusted model adjusts for age; gender; ethnicity; BMI; SOFA; SIRS; SAPS II; cardiac dysrhythmia disease; congestive heart failure; hypertension; CKD; liver disease; malignancy; albumin; bicarbonate; calcium; creatinine; glucose; hematocrit; hemoglobin; lactic acid; pH; platelet; RDW; TBIL; urea nitrogen; WBC; RRT; anticoagulants.

HRs of Coagulation Indicator, Coagulant Drug, and 30-Day Mortality in Different Models. a The non-adjusted model adjusts for none. b The adjusted model adjusts for age; gender; ethnicity; BMI; SOFA; SIRS; SAPS II; cardiac dysrhythmia disease; congestive heart failure; hypertension; CKD; liver disease; malignancy; albumin; bicarbonate; calcium; creatinine; glucose; hematocrit; hemoglobin; lactic acid; pH; platelet; RDW; TBIL; urea nitrogen; WBC; RRT; anticoagulants. In surprise, after adjusted, anticoagulants were a protected factor for DM patients (HR = 0.710, 95% (0.585, 0.862)), as shown in Table 2.

Subgroup Analysis

The association between coagulation values and anticoagulants and 30-day mortality was performed in subgroup analysis. There was no interaction between INR and 30-day mortality (Tables 3 -5).
Table 3.

Subgroup Analysis of PTT.a

PTT16.9-26.826.8-31.331.3-39.639.6-150.0 P value
Age0.017
20.36-69.4720132.044 (1.376, 3.034)1 (ref)1.251 (0.840, 1.862)1.288 (0.853, 1.945)
69.47-301.2820131.024 (0.764, 1.374)1 (ref)0.756 (0.574, 0.996)0.990 (0.758, 1.293)
Gender0.422
Female16821.764 (1.237, 2.515)1 (ref)1.077 (0.746, 1.555)1.241 (0.861, 1.787)
Male23441.036 (0.747, 1.437)1 (ref)0.799 (0.598, 1.068)1.169 (0.878, 1.557)
SAPS-II0.000
6.0-38.020131.411 (0.998, 1.996)1 (ref)1.058 (0.729, 1.536)1.180 (0.809, 1.722)
38.0-114.020131.277 (0.953, 1.710)1 (ref)0.870 (0.669, 1.130)1.077 (0.831, 1.395)
SOFA0.528
0.0-4.020131.731 (1.149, 2.606)1 (ref)1.176 (0.755, 1.832)1.477 (0.962, 2.268)
4.0-20.020131.246 (0.941, 1.650)1 (ref)0.860 (0.666, 1.112)0.952 (0.737, 1.229)
CKD0.106
035221.452 (1.137, 1.854)1 (ref)0.890 (0.697, 1.138)1.121 (0.881, 1.426)
15040.608 (0.269, 1.373)1 (ref)0.833 (0.446, 1.557)1.168 (0.633, 2.158)
Malignancy0.521
032441.112 (0.846, 1.463)1 (ref)0.866 (0.666, 1.127)1.109 (0.860, 1.429)
17822.105 (1.346, 3.293)1 (ref)1.109 (0.711, 1.729)1.156 (0.722, 1.850)

a HR (95%CI) were derived from the Cox hazard regression model. Covariates were adjusted as in adjusted model (Table 2).

Table 4.

Subgroup Analysis of PT.a

PT9.2-13.213.2-14.314.3-16.316.3-150.0P for interaction
Age0.002
20.36-69.4720131 (ref)1.562 (1.042, 2.343)1.333 (0.849, 2.094)1.215 (0.695, 2.125)
69.47-301.2820131 (ref)1.244 (0.932, 1.662)1.404 (0.979, 2.012)1.756 (1.129, 2.729)
Gender0.240
Female16821 (ref)1.448 (1.037, 2.023)1.284 (0.844, 1.953)1.831 (1.056, 3.176)
Male23441 (ref)1.239 (0.889, 1.726)1.294 (0.889, 1.883)1.251 (0.802, 1.951)
SAPS-II0.000
6.0-38.020131 (ref)1.393 (0.993, 1.954)1.412 (0.927, 2.152)1.384 (0.791, 2.420)
38.0-114.020131 (ref)1.185 (0.878, 1.601)1.155 (0.824, 1.621)1.538 (1.019, 2.322)
SOFA0.495
0.0-4.020131 (ref)1.656 (1.118, 2.452)1.457 (0.877, 2.420)1.417 (0.726, 2.767)
4.0-20.020131 (ref)1.228 (0.923, 1.635)1.213 (0.873, 1.686)1.532 (1.021, 2.299)
CKD0.103
035221 (ref)1.205 (0.937, 1.550)1.200 (0.886, 1.627)1.346 (0.931, 1.946)
15041 (ref)2.314 (1.173, 4.565)1.544 (0.755, 3.158)1.400 (0.479, 4.095)
Malignancy0.016
032441 (ref)1.226 (0.936, 1.607)1.218 (0.875, 1.696)1.268 (0.839, 1.917)
17821 (ref)1.765 (1.077, 2.891)1.453 (0.865, 2.441)2.305 (1.232, 4.312)

a HR (95%CI) were derived from the Cox hazard regression model. Covariates were adjusted as in adjusted model (Table 2).

Table 5.

Subgroup Analysis of Using Anticoagulant.a

NoUse drug P P for interaction
Age0.000
20.36-69.4720130.730 (0.525, 1.014)0.061
69.47-301.2820130.726 (0.569, 0.925)0.010
Gender0.184
Female16820.687 (0.510, 0.926)0.014
Male23440.719 (0.554, 0.933)0.013
SAPS-II0.000
6.0-38.020130.742 (0.546, 1.007)0.055
38.0-114.020130.660 (0.525, 0.831)0.000
SOFA0.715
0.0-4.020131.006 (0.696, 1.455)0.975
4.0-20.020130.607 (0.484, 0.762)0.000
CKD0.510
035220.723 (0.590, 0.887)0.002
15040.462 (0.240, 0.892)0.021
Malignancy0.109
032440.724 (0.578, 0.907)0.005
17820.686 (0.454, 1.036)0.073

a HR (95%CI) were derived from the Cox hazard regression model. Covariates were adjusted as in adjusted model (Table 2).

Subgroup Analysis of PTT.a a HR (95%CI) were derived from the Cox hazard regression model. Covariates were adjusted as in adjusted model (Table 2). Subgroup Analysis of PT.a a HR (95%CI) were derived from the Cox hazard regression model. Covariates were adjusted as in adjusted model (Table 2). Subgroup Analysis of Using Anticoagulant.a a HR (95%CI) were derived from the Cox hazard regression model. Covariates were adjusted as in adjusted model (Table 2). For elder patients (>70 years), the bigger the PT value is the higher risk of mortality. The HR (95% CIs) for PT levels 13.2-14.3 s, 14.3-16.3 s and 16.3-150.0 s were 1.244(0.932, 1.662), 1.404(0.979, 2.012) and 1.756(1.129, 2.729), respectively. However, it was a protective factor when the PTT level was 31.3-39.6 s (HR 0.756, 95% CI (0.574, 0.996)). On the contrary, for age <70 years, the PT level of 13.2-14.3 s and the PTT level of 16.9-26.8 s had a higher risk of mortality (HR 1.562, 95% CI (1.042, 2.343), HR 2.044 95% CI (1.376, 3.034)). Patients with malignancy, a hypo-coagulable state, PT level more than 16.3 s, showed an increased risk of 30-day mortality (HR 2.305, 95% CI (1.232, 4.312), P for interaction 0.016). But a hypercoagulable state, when PTT level is less than 26.8 s, also noticed a higher risk of mortality (HR 2.105, 95% CI (1.346, 3.293)). However, critical DM patients who had used anticoagulants had a decreased risk to mortality, especially elder patients (>70 years, HR 0.726, 95% CI (0.569, 0.925), P < 0.05) and high scores of SAPSII (HR 0.660, 95% CI (0.525, 0.831), P < 0.05) or SOFA (HR 0.607, 95% CI (0.484, 0.762)). Moreover, for CKD patients, treatment with anticoagulants had a significant lower risk of mortality (HR 0.462, 95% CI (0.240, 0.892)) compared to patients without CKD (HR 0.723, (0.590, 0.887)).

Discussion

Our study examined the influence of coagulable indicators and coagulant agents of patients admitted to ICU on 30-day mortality. Zheng et al extracted data from the MIMIC database, shown the association of coagulation indicators and mortality with sepsis, and concluded that increased INR related to greater mortality. Another research presented that 1 of the coagulation indicators, PT, is regarded as an independent predictor for 2-year mortality in acute myocardial infarction patients. McClintock compared biomarkers of coagulation and fibrinolysis between survivors and non-survivors, indicating that coagulation and fibrinolysis predict mortality in patients with lung-protective ventilation. Moreover, the levels of thrombomodulin and plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 (PAI) are significantly higher in non-survivors. As peripheral artery disease is a complex condition, Harky et al shown that anticoagulant therapy is paramount to preventing disease. Several observatories report that the global outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a hypercoagulable disorder. A retrospective multicenter cohort study about COVID-19 shown that the potential risk factors of older age, high SOFA score, and d-dimer greater than 1μg/mL may have a poor prognosis at an early stage. Over half of the patients had comorbidities. And, diabetes ranked as the second common comorbidities after hypertension. Besides, the odds of in-hospital mortality was higher in patients with diabetes. D-dimer and fibrin split products are also shown distinct elevated in other studies of COVID-19 patients while no change with APTT and PT. The study suggested that anticoagulation therapy is regarded as an essential treatment for COVID-19 patients based on the coagulopathy scoring system. Diabetes is 1 of the metabolic-related diseases. Metabolic syndrome is composed of atherogenic dyslipidemia, elevated blood pressure, insulin resistance and elevated glucose, a pro-thrombotic state, and a pro-inflammatory state. Also, metabolic syndrome is a multiplex factor for type 2 diabetes. The incidence of cancer is increasing with age-related to the dysfunction of mitochondrial caused by oxidative stress. Increasing reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels and products of oxidative stress were found in cancer. APTT reflects the endogenous coagulation system, of which the involved coagulation factors all from the blood. It usually occurs when the blood contacts negatively charged exposed collagen with damaged vascular endothelium. PT reflects an exogenous coagulation system activated by tissue factors in physiological situation, a transmembrane glycoprotein not expressed in blood cells and endothelial cells. Because of the exposed tissue factor’s anchored function, the clotting process is limitedly initiated when blood vessels are injured. When PT is normal, a prolonged APTT reflects a deficiency of clotting factor as VIII, IX, XI, or XII, high-molecular-weight kininogen, or prekallikrein. The prolonged PT most commonly occurs in hospitalized patients treated with antibiotics and unable to eat, leading to deficient vitamin K. Factors II, VII, IX, and X are the vitamin K–dependent procoagulant proteins. Prolong PT more commonly occur in using anticoagulant like warfarin. Normal vascular endothelium serves as a barrier to prevent the coagulant factor and platelet from contacting with the subcutaneous components and avoids the activation of the coagulant system and platelet. The vascular endothelium has anticoagulation and antiplatelet function worked by heparin sulfate proteoglycan, thrombomodulin (TM), antithrombin and so on. The imbalance of phosphorylation and dephosphorylation in DM, hyperhomocysteinemia, hypercholesterolemia, or hyperuricemia patients cause dysfunction of endothelium by modulation of vascular endothelial L-arginine/nitric oxide synthetase. When in a hypercoagulable state, anticoagulant should be applied after excluding systemic diseases such as hemopathy or impaired liver function. In patients with DIC, prolonged PT or prolonged aPTT, the application of fresh frozen plasma (FFP) may be useful, especially for patients with active bleeding. A study about anticoagulant therapy shown LMWH improves overall survival in cancer patients, even in those with advanced disease. The mechanism is thought to be associated with heparan sulfate chains of cell surface and extracellular matrix proteoglycans, growth factors and their receptors, heparanase, selectins, and the ability to release tissue factor pathway inhibitor from endothelium. No study had paid attention to the association between coagulation and critical diabetic patients, despite high morbidity and mortality. Coagulant index can be easily obtained as a regular blood test after admitted to hospital. The clinical physician may predict patients’ prognosis by these indicators. We also focused on the function of anticoagulant agents in critical diabetes patients. There were several limitations to our study. First of all, MIMIC-III is a single-center database with limited generalizability. Secondly, we only concentrated on patients admitted to ICU but paid no attention to non-critical patients. Thirdly, insufficient information might lead to bias in the analysis—for example, species, doses and duration time of anticoagulants, the value of fibrinolysis and coagulant factors. A cohort study about the association of coagulation values or anticoagulants between DM and without DM may further carry out. Although it is suggested that anticoagulants are beneficial to prognosis, more studies and monitoring of coagulation indicators are undoubtedly necessary. In the long term, whether non-critical patients had the same conclusion on the influence of coagulation values regarded to mortality, a multicenter should be in reality.

Conclusions

Critical diabetes patients may benefit from anticoagulant agents, especially for age >70 years, high SOFA scores or SAPS II and CKD patients. APTT showed a U-shaped relationship with 30-day mortality. For age <70 years patients, the abnormality of coagulant function is related to a high risk of mortality. For age >70 years old, lightly increased PT may reduce odds of 30-day hospital death, but over hypo-coagulation state increases the risk of mortality.
  25 in total

Review 1.  How to interpret and pursue an abnormal prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, and bleeding time in adults.

Authors:  Arif H Kamal; Ayalew Tefferi; Rajiv K Pruthi
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 2.  The Intrinsic Pathway of Coagulation as a Target for Antithrombotic Therapy.

Authors:  Allison P Wheeler; David Gailani
Journal:  Hematol Oncol Clin North Am       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.722

Review 3.  Anti-platelet and anti-coagulant therapy in peripheral arterial disease prior to surgical intervention.

Authors:  Amer Harky; Perry Maskell; Mika Burgess
Journal:  Vascular       Date:  2018-12-12       Impact factor: 1.285

Review 4.  Diabetes mellitus: The linkage between oxidative stress, inflammation, hypercoagulability and vascular complications.

Authors:  Caroline Pereira Domingueti; Luci Maria Sant'Ana Dusse; Maria das Graças Carvalho; Lirlândia Pires de Sousa; Karina Braga Gomes; Ana Paula Fernandes
Journal:  J Diabetes Complications       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 2.852

5.  Coagulation and fibrinolysis parameters in type 2 diabetic patients with and without diabetic vascular complications.

Authors:  Cihangir Erem; Arif Hacihasanoğlu; Sükrü Celik; Ercüment Ovali; H Onder Ersöz; Kubilay Ukinç; Orhan Deger; Münir Telatar
Journal:  Med Princ Pract       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.927

Review 6.  Non-anticoagulant heparins and inhibition of cancer.

Authors:  Benito Casu; Israel Vlodavsky; Ralph D Sanderson
Journal:  Pathophysiol Haemost Thromb       Date:  2009-01-27

7.  International Diabetes Federation 2017.

Authors:  Ann M Carracher; Payal H Marathe; Kelly L Close
Journal:  J Diabetes       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 4.006

Review 8.  Coagulation and anticoagulation in COVID-19.

Authors:  Tarik Hadid; Zyad Kafri; Ayad Al-Katib
Journal:  Blood Rev       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 8.250

9.  MIMIC-III, a freely accessible critical care database.

Authors:  Alistair E W Johnson; Tom J Pollard; Lu Shen; Li-Wei H Lehman; Mengling Feng; Mohammad Ghassemi; Benjamin Moody; Peter Szolovits; Leo Anthony Celi; Roger G Mark
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 6.444

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.