Literature DB >> 34290055

Toward predicting CYP2D6-mediated variable drug response from CYP2D6 gene sequencing data.

Maaike van der Lee1,2, William G Allard3,4, Rolf H A M Vossen3,4, Renée F Baak-Pablo1, Roberta Menafra3,4, Birgit A L M Deiman5, Maarten J Deenen1,6, Patrick Neven7, Inger Johansson8, Stefano Gastaldello8, Magnus Ingelman-Sundberg8, Henk-Jan Guchelaar1,2, Jesse J Swen9,2, Seyed Yahya Anvar9,2,3,4.   

Abstract

Pharmacogenomics is a key component of personalized medicine that promises safer and more effective drug treatment by individualizing drug choice and dose based on genetic profiles. In clinical practice, genetic biomarkers are used to categorize patients into *-alleles to predict CYP450 enzyme activity and adjust drug dosages accordingly. However, this approach leaves a large part of variability in drug response unexplained. Here, we present a proof-of-concept approach that uses continuous-scale (instead of categorical) assignments to predict enzyme activity. We used full CYP2D6 gene sequences obtained with long-read amplicon-based sequencing and cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6-mediated tamoxifen metabolism data from a prospective study of 561 patients with breast cancer to train a neural network. The model explained 79% of interindividual variability in CYP2D6 activity compared to 54% with the conventional *-allele approach, assigned enzyme activities to known alleles with previously reported effects, and predicted the activity of previously uncharacterized combinations of variants. The results were replicated in an independent cohort of tamoxifen-treated patients (model R 2 adjusted = 0.66 versus *-allele R 2 adjusted = 0.35) and a cohort of patients treated with the CYP2D6 substrate venlafaxine (model R 2 adjusted = 0.64 versus *-allele R 2 adjusted = 0.55). Human embryonic kidney cells were used to confirm the effect of five genetic variants on metabolism of the CYP2D6 substrate bufuralol in vitro. These results demonstrate the advantage of a continuous scale and a completely phased genotype for prediction of CYP2D6 enzyme activity and could potentially enable more accurate prediction of individual drug response.
Copyright © 2021 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34290055     DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.abf3637

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Transl Med        ISSN: 1946-6234            Impact factor:   17.956


  10 in total

Review 1.  Keeping pace with CYP2D6 haplotype discovery: innovative methods to assign function.

Authors:  Karen E Brown; Jack W Staples; Erica L Woodahl
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 2.533

Review 2.  Why We Need to Take a Closer Look at Genetic Contributions to CYP3A Activity.

Authors:  Qinglian Zhai; Maaike van der Lee; Teun van Gelder; Jesse J Swen
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 5.988

3.  Application of long-read sequencing to elucidate complex pharmacogenomic regions: a proof of principle.

Authors:  Maaike van der Lee; William J Rowell; Roberta Menafra; Henk-Jan Guchelaar; Jesse J Swen; Seyed Yahya Anvar
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2022-02       Impact factor: 3.550

4.  Methodology for clinical genotyping of CYP2D6 and CYP2C19.

Authors:  Beatriz Carvalho Henriques; Avery Buchner; Xiuying Hu; Yabing Wang; Vasyl Yavorskyy; Keanna Wallace; Rachael Dong; Kristina Martens; Michael S Carr; Bahareh Behroozi Asl; Joshua Hague; Sudhakar Sivapalan; Wolfgang Maier; Mojca Z Dernovsek; Neven Henigsberg; Joanna Hauser; Daniel Souery; Annamaria Cattaneo; Ole Mors; Marcella Rietschel; Gerald Pfeffer; Stacey Hume; Katherine J Aitchison
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2021-11-22       Impact factor: 6.222

Review 5.  From pharmacogenetics to pharmaco-omics: Milestones and future directions.

Authors:  Chiara Auwerx; Marie C Sadler; Alexandre Reymond; Zoltán Kutalik
Journal:  HGG Adv       Date:  2022-03-16

6.  Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling to Describe the CYP2D6 Activity Score-Dependent Metabolism of Paroxetine, Atomoxetine and Risperidone.

Authors:  Simeon Rüdesheim; Dominik Selzer; Thomas Mürdter; Svitlana Igel; Reinhold Kerb; Matthias Schwab; Thorsten Lehr
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 6.525

7.  The Polymorphic Nuclear Factor NFIB Regulates Hepatic CYP2D6 Expression and Influences Risperidone Metabolism in Psychiatric Patients.

Authors:  Hasan Çağın Lenk; Katharina Klöditz; Inger Johansson; Robert Løvsletten Smith; Marin M Jukić; Espen Molden; Magnus Ingelman-Sundberg
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2022-03-20       Impact factor: 6.903

8.  Cas9 targeted nanopore sequencing with enhanced variant calling improves CYP2D6-CYP2D7 hybrid allele genotyping.

Authors:  Kaat Rubben; Laurentijn Tilleman; Koen Deserranno; Olivier Tytgat; Dieter Deforce; Filip Van Nieuwerburgh
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 6.020

9.  Developing CIRdb as a catalog of natural genetic variation in the Canary Islanders.

Authors:  Ana Díaz-de Usera; Luis A Rubio-Rodríguez; Adrián Muñoz-Barrera; Jose M Lorenzo-Salazar; Beatriz Guillen-Guio; David Jáspez; Almudena Corrales; Antonio Íñigo-Campos; Víctor García-Olivares; María Del Cristo Rodríguez Pérez; Itahisa Marcelino-Rodríguez; Antonio Cabrera de León; Rafaela González-Montelongo; Carlos Flores
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-27       Impact factor: 4.996

10.  Influence of probenecid on endoxifen systemic exposure in breast cancer patients on adjuvant tamoxifen treatment.

Authors:  Stefan A J Buck; C Louwrens Braal; Maaike M Hofman; Esther Oomen-de Hoop; Peter de Bruijn; Inge M Ghobadi Moghaddam-Helmantel; Koen G A M Hussaarts; Mijntje B Vastbinder; Quirine C van Rossum-Schornagel; Ron H N van Schaik; Agnes Jager; Stijn L W Koolen; Ron H J Mathijssen
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 8.168

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.