Literature DB >> 34289983

Contemporary issues in the implementation of lung cancer screening.

Stephen Lam1,2, Martin Tammemagi3.   

Abstract

Lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography can reduce death from lung cancer by 20-24% in high-risk smokers. National lung cancer screening programmes have been implemented in the USA and Korea and are being implemented in Europe, Canada and other countries. Lung cancer screening is a process, not a test. It requires an organised programmatic approach to replicate the lung cancer mortality reduction and safety of pivotal clinical trials. Cost-effectiveness of a screening programme is strongly influenced by screening sensitivity and specificity, age to stop screening, integration of smoking cessation intervention for current smokers, screening uptake, nodule management and treatment costs. Appropriate management of screen-detected lung nodules has significant implications for healthcare resource utilisation and minimising harm from radiation exposure related to imaging studies, invasive procedures and clinically significant distress. This review focuses on selected contemporary issues in the path to implement a cost-effective lung cancer screening at the population level. The future impact of emerging technologies such as deep learning and biomarkers are also discussed.
Copyright ©The authors 2021.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34289983     DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0288-2020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Respir Rev        ISSN: 0905-9180


  7 in total

1.  Lung cancer screening primer: Key information for primary care providers.

Authors:  Anna N Wilkinson; Stephen Lam
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2021-11       Impact factor: 3.275

2. 

Authors:  Anna N Wilkinson; Stephen Lam
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2021-11       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 3.  Implementing Lung Cancer Screening in Europe: Taking a Systems Approach.

Authors:  Suzanne Wait; Arturo Alvarez-Rosete; Tasnime Osama; Dani Bancroft; Robin Cornelissen; Ante Marušić; Pilar Garrido; Mariusz Adamek; Jan van Meerbeeck; Annemiek Snoeckx; Olivier Leleu; Ebba Hallersjö Hult; Sébastien Couraud; David R Baldwin
Journal:  JTO Clin Res Rep       Date:  2022-04-22

4.  Lung cancer in Europe: The way forward.

Authors:  Monica Racovita; Eleanor Wheeler; Suzanne Wait; Dani Bancroft; Rowan Eastabrook; Tit Albreht; Anne-Marie Baird; Jacek Jassem; Aoife McNamara; Silvia Novello; Cornel Radu-Loghin; Jan P van Meerbeeck
Journal:  Tob Prev Cessat       Date:  2022-02-15

5.  Risk Assessment of Early Lung Cancer with LDCT and Health Examinations.

Authors:  Hou-Tai Chang; Ping-Huai Wang; Wei-Fang Chen; Chen-Ju Lin
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 4.614

6.  Lung cancer: progress with prognosis and the changing state of play.

Authors:  Fraser J Brims; Annette McWilliams; Susan V Harden; Ken O'Byrne
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 12.776

Review 7.  Socio-Economic Inequalities in Lung Cancer Outcomes: An Overview of Systematic Reviews.

Authors:  Daniel Redondo-Sánchez; Dafina Petrova; Miguel Rodríguez-Barranco; Pablo Fernández-Navarro; José Juan Jiménez-Moleón; Maria-José Sánchez
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 6.639

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.