Anna N Wilkinson1, Stephen Lam2. 1. Assistant Professor in the Department of Family Medicine at the University of Ottawa in Ontario, a family physician with the Ottawa Academic Family Health Team, a general practitioner oncologist at The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Program Director of PGY-3 FP-Oncology, Chair of the Cancer Care Member Interest Group at the College of Family Physicians of Canada, and Regional Cancer Primary Care Lead for Champlain Region. anwilkinson@toh.ca. 2. Professor of Medicine at the University of British Columbia in Vancouver, a respirologist at BC Cancer, and Distinguished Scientist Leon Judah Blackmore Chair in Lung Cancer Research and Medical Director of the BC Lung Screening Program at the BC Cancer Research Centre.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To review new evidence reported since the 2016 publication of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care recommendations and to summarize key facets of lung cancer screening to better equip primary care providers (PCPs) in anticipation of wider implementation of the recommendations. QUALITY OF EVIDENCE: A new, large randomized controlled trial has been published since 2016, as have updates from 4 other trials. PubMed was searched for studies published between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2020, using search words including lung cancer screening eligibility, lung cancer screening criteria, and lung cancer screening guidelines. All information from peer-reviewed articles, reference lists, books, and websites was considered. MAIN MESSAGE: Lung cancers diagnosed at stage 4 have a 5-year survival rate of only 5% and have a disproportionate impact on those with lower socioeconomic status, rural populations, and Indigenous populations. By downstaging, or diagnosing lung cancers at an earlier and more treatable stage, lung cancer screening reduces mortality with a number needed to screen of 250 to prevent 1 death. Practical aspects of lung cancer screening are reviewed, including criteria to screen, appropriate low-dose computed tomography screening, and management of findings. Harms of screening, such as overdiagnosis and incidental findings, are discussed to allow PCPs to appropriately counsel their patients in the face of ongoing implementation of new lung cancer screening programs. CONCLUSION: Lung cancer screening, with its embedded emphasis on smoking cessation, is an excellent addition to PCPs' preventive health care tools. The implementation of formal and pilot lung cancer screening programs across Canada means that PCPs will be increasingly required to counsel their patients around the uptake of lung cancer screening.
OBJECTIVE: To review new evidence reported since the 2016 publication of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care recommendations and to summarize key facets of lung cancer screening to better equip primary care providers (PCPs) in anticipation of wider implementation of the recommendations. QUALITY OF EVIDENCE: A new, large randomized controlled trial has been published since 2016, as have updates from 4 other trials. PubMed was searched for studies published between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2020, using search words including lung cancer screening eligibility, lung cancer screening criteria, and lung cancer screening guidelines. All information from peer-reviewed articles, reference lists, books, and websites was considered. MAIN MESSAGE: Lung cancers diagnosed at stage 4 have a 5-year survival rate of only 5% and have a disproportionate impact on those with lower socioeconomic status, rural populations, and Indigenous populations. By downstaging, or diagnosing lung cancers at an earlier and more treatable stage, lung cancer screening reduces mortality with a number needed to screen of 250 to prevent 1 death. Practical aspects of lung cancer screening are reviewed, including criteria to screen, appropriate low-dose computed tomography screening, and management of findings. Harms of screening, such as overdiagnosis and incidental findings, are discussed to allow PCPs to appropriately counsel their patients in the face of ongoing implementation of new lung cancer screening programs. CONCLUSION: Lung cancer screening, with its embedded emphasis on smoking cessation, is an excellent addition to PCPs' preventive health care tools. The implementation of formal and pilot lung cancer screening programs across Canada means that PCPs will be increasingly required to counsel their patients around the uptake of lung cancer screening.
Authors: Joshua D Mitchell; Nicole Fergestrom; Brian F Gage; Robert Paisley; Patrick Moon; Eric Novak; Michael Cheezum; Leslee J Shaw; Todd C Villines Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2018-12-25 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Sonya Cressman; Stuart J Peacock; Martin C Tammemägi; William K Evans; Natasha B Leighl; John R Goffin; Alain Tremblay; Geoffrey Liu; Daria Manos; Paul MacEachern; Rick Bhatia; Serge Puksa; Garth Nicholas; Annette McWilliams; John R Mayo; John Yee; John C English; Reka Pataky; Emily McPherson; Sukhinder Atkar-Khattra; Michael R Johnston; Heidi Schmidt; Frances A Shepherd; Kam Soghrati; Kayvan Amjadi; Paul Burrowes; Christian Couture; Harmanjatinder S Sekhon; Kazuhiro Yasufuku; Glenwood Goss; Diana N Ionescu; David M Hwang; Simon Martel; Don D Sin; Wan C Tan; Stefan Urbanski; Zhaolin Xu; Ming-Sound Tsao; Stephen Lam Journal: J Thorac Oncol Date: 2017-05-10 Impact factor: 15.609
Authors: Nikolaus Becker; Erna Motsch; Anke Trotter; Claus P Heussel; Hendrik Dienemann; Philipp A Schnabel; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor; Sandra González Maldonado; Anthony B Miller; Rudolf Kaaks; Stefan Delorme Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2019-06-20 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Denise R Aberle; Amanda M Adams; Christine D Berg; William C Black; Jonathan D Clapp; Richard M Fagerstrom; Ilana F Gareen; Constantine Gatsonis; Pamela M Marcus; JoRean D Sicks Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-06-29 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Alain Tremblay; Niloofar Taghizadeh; Jane Huang; Debra Kasowski; Paul MacEachern; Paul Burrowes; Andrew J Graham; James A Dickinson; Stephen C Lam; Huiming Yang; Rommy Koetzler; Martin Tammemagi; Kathryn Taylor; Eric L R Bédard Journal: J Thorac Oncol Date: 2019-05-08 Impact factor: 15.609
Authors: Martin C Tammemägi; Hormuzd A Katki; William G Hocking; Timothy R Church; Neil Caporaso; Paul A Kvale; Anil K Chaturvedi; Gerard A Silvestri; Tom L Riley; John Commins; Christine D Berg Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2013-02-21 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Joan E Walter; Marjolein A Heuvelmans; Pim A de Jong; Rozemarijn Vliegenthart; Peter M A van Ooijen; Robin B Peters; Kevin Ten Haaf; Uraujh Yousaf-Khan; Carlijn M van der Aalst; Geertruida H de Bock; Willem Mali; Harry J M Groen; Harry J de Koning; Matthijs Oudkerk Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2016-06-06 Impact factor: 41.316