Literature DB >> 34289657

Complement dysregulation is associated with severe COVID-19 illness.

Jia Yu1, Gloria F Gerber1, Hang Chen1, Xuan Yuan1, Shruti Chaturvedi1, Evan M Braunstein1, Robert A Brodsky2.   

Abstract

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) may manifest as thrombosis, stroke, renal failure, myocardial infarction, and thrombocytopenia, reminiscent of other complement- mediated diseases. Multiple clinical and preclinical studies have implicated complement in the pathogenesis of COVID-19 illness. We previously found that the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein activates the alternative pathway of complement (APC) in vitro through interfering with the function of complement factor H, a key negative regulator of APC. Here, we demonstrated that serum from 58 COVID-19 patients (32 patients with minimal oxygen requirement, 7 on high flow oxygen, 17 requiring mechanical ventilation and 2 deaths) can induce complementmediated cell death in a functional assay (the modified Ham test) and increase membrane attack complex (C5b-9) deposition on the cell surface. A positive modified Ham assay (>20% cell-killing) was present in 41.2% COVID-19 patients requiring intubation (n=7/17) and only 6.3% in COVID-19 patients requiring minimal oxygen support (n=2/32). C5 and factor D inhibition effectively mitigated the complement amplification induced by COVID-19 patient serum. Increased serum factor Bb level was associated with disease severity in COVID-19 patients, suggesting that APC dysregulation plays an important role. Moreover, SARS-CoV-2 spike proteins directly block complement factor H from binding to heparin, which may lead to complement dysregulation on the cell surface. Taken together, our data suggest that complement dysregulation contributes to the pathogenesis of COVID-19 and may be a marker of disease severity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34289657      PMCID: PMC9052917          DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2021.279155

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Haematologica        ISSN: 0390-6078            Impact factor:   11.047


Introduction

Complement has emerged as a potential driver of the pathogenesis of severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).[1-3] Clinically, endothelial damage, systemic microvascular thrombosis and recalcitrant hypercoagulability observed in COVID- 19 mirror other disorders of complement regulation, such as atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) and catastrophic antiphospholipid antibody syndrome (CAPS).[1-6] Autopsy studies showed microvascular thrombi and complement deposition in the lungs and kidneys of patients with severe COVID-19.[7,8] Several studies have demonstrated elevated levels of soluble C5a and C5b-9 in COVID-19 patients.[9,10] Further, plasma C3a levels are higher in COVID-19 patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) compared to non-ICU patients.[11] A small number of patients treated with eculizumab, a monoclonal anti-C5 antibody, experienced rapid improvement in hypoxia and inflammatory markers.[12,13] Three patients treated with an upstream complement C3 inhibitor demonstrated reduction in inflammatory markers and improved disease severity within 48 hours of treatment.[14] Clinical trials of complement inhibitors in COVID-19 are ongoing (clinicaltrials gov. Identifier: NCT04355494, NCT04390464). The complement system, a key component of the human innate immune response, is a collection of proteases, receptors and inhibitors that functions to eliminate cellular debris, promote inflammation and defend against pathogens.[15] The system consists of three major pathways – the classical, lectin and alternative pathways (APC). The three pathways converge on the cleavage of C3 and subsequently C5, which produces anaphylatoxins (C3a and C5a, respectively) that are associated with the acute inflammatory response and thrombosis.[16] The membrane attack complex (C5b-9) is the terminal product of complement activation.[15] Evidence for the role of complement in COVID-19 continues to emerge, but understanding of the underlying mechanisms remains incomplete. Recently, we demonstrated that the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (subunits 1 and 2) converts inactivator surfaces into activator surfaces through interference with the function of complement factor H (CFH), a critical negative regulator of APC on host cells.[17] These studies were performed by adding recombinant spike protein to normal human serum (NHS) and measuring complement-mediated killing on the surface of nucleated cells. Complement inhibition with C5 and factor D inhibitors effectively prevented C5b-9 accumulation induced by the SARS-CoV-2 spike proteins.[17] In order to confirm that complement is a rational target for treating COVID-19, it is important to show that serum from patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 also displays complement dysregulation. In this study, we evaluated cell surface C5b-9 deposition and complement-mediated cell killing induced by COVID-19 patient sera in the modified Ham (mHam) test[5,18,19] and showed that impaired complement regulation correlates with COVID-19 disease severity and can be mitigated with complement inhibitors.

Methods

Patients and samples collection

Serum samples and a limited clinical data set were obtained for 58 COVID-19 patients from the Clinical Characterization Protocol for Severe Infectious Diseases repository (clinicaltrials gov. Identifier: NCT04496466), approved by the Johns Hopkins Institutional Review Board. Samples were collected between April and May 2020. One sample collected outside of the patient’s hospitalization for COVID-19 was excluded. We also recruited one COVID-19 patient requiring mechanical ventilation and five healthy individuals who received the Pfizer-BioNTech (BTN162b2) COVID-19 vaccine between November and December 2020. Informed written consent for sample use from the Complement Associated Disorders Registry study was obtained. Blood was collected by venipuncture in serum separator tubes. Date of COVID-19 diagnosis was based on the earliest known positive SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid amplification test from a nasopharyngeal swab or time an infection flag was placed on the patient’s chart. Severity of COVID-19 was graded based on World Health Organization (WHO) eight-point ordinal outcome scale.[20]

The modified Ham test

The mHam test was used to assess complement-mediated cell killing of TF1PIGAnull cells induced by patient serum as previously described.[5,17-19,21] The assay is detailed in the Online Supplementary Appendix.

Detection of complement activity by flow cytometry

C5b-9 and C3c deposition after incubation of TF1PIGAnull cells with COVID-19 patient serum was measured by flow cytometry as previously described.[5,17,21] The assay is detailed in Online Supplementary Appendix.

Complement inhibition in patient serum

Patient serum was incubated with 1 μM factor D inhibitor (ACH145951, Achillion Pharmaceuticals) or 50 μg anti-C5 monoclonal antibody (anti-C5Ab, Alexion pharmaceuticals) and then added to cells. C5b-9 and C3c deposition was measured by flow cytometry.

Quantification of serum factor Bb by enzyme-linked immunosorbant assay

Factor Bb level in patient serum was measured using MicroVue Bb Plus EIA kit (Quidel). NHS preincubated with 20 μg/mL cobra venom factor (Complement Technology) served as a positive control.

Competitive heparin binding assay

Immunoprecipitation of His-tagged SARS-CoV-2 spike protein subunit 1 (S1, RayBiotech) and subunit 2 (S2, RayBiotech) was performed using Heparin-Sepharose beads (BioVision). We incubated 0.2 M S1 or S2 overnight at 4°C with 80 μL beads in the presence and absence of 0.2 M CFH protein (Complement Technology) in phosphate buffered saline. After washing, the beads were denatured with LDS buffer (Invitrogen) and reducing agent (Invitrogen) at 70°C for 15 minutes and then centrifuged. The supernatants were collected for western blotting. We used 10 μL of input protein solution for western blotting. We loaded 10 μL reduced proteins to mini-PROTEIN TGX Gels (Bio-Rad Laboratories) and then transferred to PVDF membranes. The membrane was probed with anti-CFH antibody (1:1,500, Cat. Sc-53073, Santa Cruz Biotechnology) or anti-His antibody (1:2,000, Cat. Sc-53073, Santa Cruz Biotechnology). The blot was incubated with HRP-linked anti-mouse immunoglobulin (Ig) G (1:10,000, Cat. 7076S, Cell Signaling Technology) and imaged with SuperSignal West Femto Maximum Sensitivity Substrate (Thermo Fisher).

Statistical analysis

Data was summarized as mean ± standard error (SE). c[2] test was used to compare the rates of mHam positivity across WHO groups. Student’s t-test was used to evaluate differences between unpaired groups. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Patient characteristics

All 58 patients studied required hospitalization for their COVID-19 illness (WHO score 4-8). Thirty-two patients required minimal oxygen support (WHO score 4), seven required high flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy (WHO score 5), 17 received mechanical ventilation and additional organ support (WHO score 7), and two died (WHO score 8) (Table 1). Five healthy individuals were recruited at the same hospital system and their serum samples post COVID-19 vaccination were tested for complement activation.
Table 1.

COVID-19 patient characteristics.

COVID-19 patient serum induced complement-mediated cell killing

The mHam measures the ability of a nucleated cell to protect itself from complement-mediated cell killing in vitro in the absence of downstream cell-surface complement regulators, CD55 and CD59.[18,21] Thus, mHam exposes defects in complement regulation in patient serum. This assay has been validated in complement-mediated disorders such as aHUS, HELLP and CAPS.[5,18,21,22] The mHam test was positive (> 20% cell killing) in 41.2% (7 of 17) of patients who required intubation (WHO score 7), compared to 6.3% (2 of 32) of those who only needed minimal oxygen support (WHO score 4) (P=0.002) (Figure 1). Serum from COVID-19 patients who required mechanical ventilation induced significantly higher cell killing compared to those on minimal oxygen support (mean 17.3% vs. 7.7%, P<0.01), suggesting that SARS-CoV-2 infection impairs the ability to regulate complement on cells.
Figure 1.

Complement-mediated cell killing induced by COVID-19 patient serum is associated with disease severity. TF1PIGAnull cells were treated with 20% COVID- 19 patient serum, and cell killing was measured using the modified Ham (mHam) test. Complement-mediated cell killing (%) was significantly elevated in COVID-19 patients requiring mechanical ventilation (vent), as compared to pooled normal human serum (NHS) and COVID-19 patients who needed minimal oxygen support (P<0.01). The dotted line at 20% non-viable cells represented the threshold for a positive mHam based on a previously established receiver operator curve. All experiments were run in triplicate. Sia: sialidase (used as a positive control); stx1: Shiga toxin subunit 1 (used as a positive control). Hi-Flow: High-Flow Oxygen.

COVID-19 patient characteristics. Complement-mediated cell killing induced by COVID-19 patient serum is associated with disease severity. TF1PIGAnull cells were treated with 20% COVID- 19 patient serum, and cell killing was measured using the modified Ham (mHam) test. Complement-mediated cell killing (%) was significantly elevated in COVID-19 patients requiring mechanical ventilation (vent), as compared to pooled normal human serum (NHS) and COVID-19 patients who needed minimal oxygen support (P<0.01). The dotted line at 20% non-viable cells represented the threshold for a positive mHam based on a previously established receiver operator curve. All experiments were run in triplicate. Sia: sialidase (used as a positive control); stx1: Shiga toxin subunit 1 (used as a positive control). Hi-Flow: High-Flow Oxygen.

COVID-19 patient serum increased C5b-9 and C3c deposition on cell surface

C3c and C5b-9 deposition, biomarkers for complement activation, on the surface of TF1PIGAnull cells after exposure to COVID-19 patient serum was evaluated. All complement pathway buffer (GVB++) and alternative pathway specific buffer (GVB0 MgEGTA) were used. In all pathway buffer, C5b-9 deposition was increased compared to control normal human serum in virtually all COVID-19 patients regardless of WHO score (Figure 2A). In APC specific buffer, the deposition of C5b-9 was significantly elevated in patients requiring minimal oxygen support, intubation and those who died (Figure 2B) compared to control serum. C3c deposition was significantly increased in all patient groups in APC specific buffer (Figure 2D) but not in all complement pathway buffer (Figure 2C).
Figure 2.

COVID-19 patient serum induces C5b-9 and C3c deposition on the cell surface. COVID-19 patient serum led to increased cell surface C5b-9 deposition in all complement pathway buffer (A) and alternative pathway specific buffer (B). C3c deposition was increased compared to control normal human serum (NHS) in all complement pathway buffer (C) and alternative pathway specific buffer (D). Statistical significance was calculated between each disease group and the NHS control group. EDTA: ethylenediaminetetraacetic (used as a negative control); Sia: sialidase (used as a positive control for alternative pathway of complement [APC] activation); stx1: Shiga toxin subunit 1 (used as a positive control for all complement pathways activation). Vent: ventilation.

We selected patient samples with positive mHam and increased C5b-9 deposition to perform blocking experiments. Representative examples of blocking with the complement inhibitors in two patient sera are shown in Figure 3. C5b-9 deposition was completely inhibited by blocking the terminal complement pathway with an anti- C5 antibody. The factor D inhibitor (ACH145951), an APC-specific inhibitor, partially reduced C5b-9 deposition induced by serum from patient 2 and achieved complete inhibition in patient 1 (Figure 3A). In addition, the factor D inhibitor was more effective than anti-C5 antibody in inhibiting C3c deposition triggered by COVID-19 patient sera (Figure 3B), since it targets upstream of the anti-C5 monoclonal antibody.
Figure 3.

C5 and factor D inhibition block complement activation induced by COVID-19 patient serum. Flow cytometry demonstrated increased C5b-9 (A) and C3c (B) deposition in two representative COVID-19 patients. C5b-9 deposition was completely blocked in the presence of 50 μg anti-C5 antibody. 1 μM factor D inhibitor (ACH145951) partially reduced the C5b-9 deposition in patient 2 and achieved complete inhibition in patient 1 (A). Factor D inhibitor also effectively decreased C3c accumulation induced by both patients’ sera, whereas anti-C5 antibody did not appreciably prevent C3c deposition (B). SSCH: side scatter; ACH145951: factor D inhibitor; Anti- C5 Ab: anti-C5 monoclonal antibody. NHS: normal human serum; EDTA: ethylenediaminetetraacetic.

COVID-19 patient serum induces C5b-9 and C3c deposition on the cell surface. COVID-19 patient serum led to increased cell surface C5b-9 deposition in all complement pathway buffer (A) and alternative pathway specific buffer (B). C3c deposition was increased compared to control normal human serum (NHS) in all complement pathway buffer (C) and alternative pathway specific buffer (D). Statistical significance was calculated between each disease group and the NHS control group. EDTA: ethylenediaminetetraacetic (used as a negative control); Sia: sialidase (used as a positive control for alternative pathway of complement [APC] activation); stx1: Shiga toxin subunit 1 (used as a positive control for all complement pathways activation). Vent: ventilation. C5 and factor D inhibition block complement activation induced by COVID-19 patient serum. Flow cytometry demonstrated increased C5b-9 (A) and C3c (B) deposition in two representative COVID-19 patients. C5b-9 deposition was completely blocked in the presence of 50 μg anti-C5 antibody. 1 μM factor D inhibitor (ACH145951) partially reduced the C5b-9 deposition in patient 2 and achieved complete inhibition in patient 1 (A). Factor D inhibitor also effectively decreased C3c accumulation induced by both patients’ sera, whereas anti-C5 antibody did not appreciably prevent C3c deposition (B). SSCH: side scatter; ACH145951: factor D inhibitor; Anti- C5 Ab: anti-C5 monoclonal antibody. NHS: normal human serum; EDTA: ethylenediaminetetraacetic. The Bb level is increased in COVID-19 patient serum and associated with disease severity. Serum Bb level was significantly elevated in COVID-19 patients who required minimal oxygen support, high flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy (Hi-Flow oxygen) and mechanical ventilation (Vent) as compared to pooled normal human serum (NHS) and healthy controls (healthy ctrl). Patients requiring mechanical ventilation also had significantly higher serum Bb level than patients with minimal oxygen support (P<0.05), suggesting greater alternative pathway of complement dysregulation. All experiments were run in duplicate. CVF: cobra venom factor (used as a positive control).

Increased alternative pathway of complement activation is associated with COVID-19 disease severity

We utilized standard enzyme-linked immunosorbant assay (ELISA) to measure the factor Bb level in COVID-19 patient serum. Factor Bb, which results from cleavage of factor B by factor D, is a biomarker of APC activation. Regardless of disease severity, the serum level of Bb was significantly higher in COVID-19 patients compared to the healthy controls. We also found that COVID-19 patients requiring intubation (WHO score 7) had significantly higher Bb levels than those requiring minimal oxygen support (WHO score 4) (Figure 4). These observations suggested that increased APC activation is associated with disease severity in COVID-19.
Figure 4.

The Bb level is increased in COVID-19 patient serum and associated with disease severity. Serum Bb level was significantly elevated in COVID-19 patients who required minimal oxygen support, high flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy (Hi-Flow oxygen) and mechanical ventilation (Vent) as compared to pooled normal human serum (NHS) and healthy controls (healthy ctrl). Patients requiring mechanical ventilation also had significantly higher serum Bb level than patients with minimal oxygen support (P<0.05), suggesting greater alternative pathway of complement dysregulation. All experiments were run in duplicate. CVF: cobra venom factor (used as a positive control).

SARS-CoV-2 spike proteins compete with complement factor H for cell surface heparan sulfate binding

We previously demonstrated that SARS-CoV-2 spike proteins (both subunit 1 and 2) bind heparan sulfate on the cell surface.[17] Heparan sulfate also serves as a necessary cofactor for binding of SARS-CoV-2 spike proteins to the angiotensin receptor 2 (ACE2).[23] CFH, a negative regulator of APC, also utilizes glycosaminoglycans, such as heparan sulfate, and a2,3 N-linked sialic acid residues for binding to nucleated cells; thus, we hypothesized that SARS-CoV-2 spike protein competes with CFH for binding to heparan sulfate and its tissue specific, more highly-sulfated variant, heparin. In order to evaluate whether SARS-CoV-2 spike proteins block CFH from binding to heparan sulfate, we compared the heparin-binding activity of CFH in the presence and absence of the SARS-CoV-2 spike proteins using heparin-linked beads. CFH alone bound to the heparinbeads with high affinity (Figure 5A, lane 1). In the presence of SARS-CoV-2 S1 and S2, binding of CFH to the heparinbeads was markedly reduced (Figure 5A, lanes 2 and 3).
Figure 5.

SARS-CoV-2 spike proteins compete with complement factor H for the same binding sites on heparin. (A) The binding of complement factor H (CFH) to heparin-linked beads was markedly reduced in the presence of SARSCoV- 2 spike protein subunit 1 (S1) and subunit 2 (S2). The western blot was performed using anti-CFH antibody. (B) S1 and S2 retained similarly high binding affinity to heparin-linked beads in the presence and absence of CFH. The western blot was performed using anti-His antibody. The input is the protein solution that is used to incubate with the beads. S: SARS-CoV-2 spike protein; S1: SARSCoV- 2 spike protein subunit 1; S2: SARS-CoV-2 spike protein subunit 2.

We also compared the heparin-binding ability of SARSCoV- 2 spike proteins in the presence and absence of CFH. S1 alone showed strong binding to heparin-beads and retained high heparin-binding activity in the presence of CFH (Figure 5B). S2 bound to heparin-beads with similarly high efficiency under both conditions (Figure 5C). These results indicated the SARS-CoV-2 spike proteins have higher binding affinity for heparin than CFH and interfere with the binding of CFH to heparin.

SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine does not markedly increase complement activity in healthy individuals

The mRNA COVID-19 vaccines employ the SARS-CoV- 2 spike protein as an immunogenic target. Given that SARS-CoV-2 spike proteins activate complement in vitro, concern arises whether the COVID-19 vaccine could also trigger transient complement dysregulation in vivo through generation of the spike protein. In order to test this, we obtained serum samples from five healthy individuals who received both doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech (BTN162b2) COVID-19 vaccine at three time points: before the vaccine (baseline), 24 to 48 hours after receiving the first vaccine dose, and 24 to 48 hours after the second dose. We measured the serum level of factor Bb in these individuals pre- and post-COVID-19 vaccination. Two of five individuals showed significantly higher serum Bb levels from their baseline after receiving the COVID-19 vaccine (Figure 6). Notably, these two individuals experienced side effects post vaccination including fever, headache and fatigue. We next performed functional assays to assess for cell surface complement amplification post-vaccination. On average, serum collected after the first vaccine dose did not lead to increased C5b-9 deposition on the surface of TF1PIGAnull cells compared to the individual’s serum pre-vaccination. The second dose of the vaccine led to an 11% increase in the C5b-9 deposition. All individuals had negative mHam results at baseline, which remained negative after receiving the COVID-19 vaccine (data not shown). These results from the functional assays demonstrate that the Pfizer-BioNTech SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine does not sufficiently alter complement regulation in healthy individuals.
Figure 6.

SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine minimally induces cell surface C5b-9 deposition but increases serum Bb level in healthy individuals. Sera from five healthy individuals were collected before they received the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine, 24-48 hours after their first vaccine dose and 24-48 hours after their second dose. (A) On average, the first vaccine dose did not lead to elevation in C5b-9 deposition from the individual’s baseline, whereas the second dose increased cell surface C5b-9 deposition by 11%. (B) Two of five healthy individuals (Ctrl) had markedly increased serum Bb level post vaccination as compared to baseline, which correlated with their vaccine side effects including headache, fatigue and fever.

Discussion

Previously, we showed that the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein dysregulates the alternative complement pathway in vitro by interfering with CFH function on the cell.[17] Here, we extend these findings and demonstrate that the SARSCoV- 2 spike protein directly competes with CFH for binding to heparan sulfate. In addition, we demonstrate, for the first time, that COVID-19 patient serum induces complement dysregulation on the cell surface using a functional assay (the mHam). Moreover, a positive mHam is highly associated with disease severity in COVID-19 patients, and C5b-9 cell deposition induced by patient sera is blocked by factor D and C5 inhibitors. Our finding that complement dysregulation is inherent to the pathogenesis of COVID-19 is in agreement with existing preclinical and clinical data. Autopsy studies revealed depositions of complement proteins in lung and other tissues co-localize with the SARS-CoV-2 spike proteins. [8,24] Markers of complement activation in sera from COVID-19 hospitalized patients are associated with respiratory failure. Specifically, markers of classical/lectin (C4d), alternative (C3bBbP) and common pathway (C3bc, sC5b-9) amplification were increased in COVID-19 patient sera throughout hospitalization, indicative of sustained activation of all complement pathways.[9-11,25] Sinkovits et al.[26] showed that complement overactivation and consumption is predictive of in-hospital mortality in SARS-CoV-2 infection. Specifically, these authors reported consumption of C3 in the serum of patients with severe COVID-19 disease. This is consistent with our finding of increased C3c deposition on TF1PIGAnull cells. In transcriptome analysis, expression of multiple complement genes such as C2, C3, CFB and CFH were upregulated in COVID-19 patients.[27,28] Gavriilaki et al.[29] analyzed genetic and clinical data from 97 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 and found an increase in rare variants associated with thrombotic microangiopathies (several involving the alternative pathway of complement) in patients with severe COVID-19 disease. SARS-CoV-2 spike proteins compete with complement factor H for the same binding sites on heparin. (A) The binding of complement factor H (CFH) to heparin-linked beads was markedly reduced in the presence of SARSCoV- 2 spike protein subunit 1 (S1) and subunit 2 (S2). The western blot was performed using anti-CFH antibody. (B) S1 and S2 retained similarly high binding affinity to heparin-linked beads in the presence and absence of CFH. The western blot was performed using anti-His antibody. The input is the protein solution that is used to incubate with the beads. S: SARS-CoV-2 spike protein; S1: SARSCoV- 2 spike protein subunit 1; S2: SARS-CoV-2 spike protein subunit 2. SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine minimally induces cell surface C5b-9 deposition but increases serum Bb level in healthy individuals. Sera from five healthy individuals were collected before they received the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine, 24-48 hours after their first vaccine dose and 24-48 hours after their second dose. (A) On average, the first vaccine dose did not lead to elevation in C5b-9 deposition from the individual’s baseline, whereas the second dose increased cell surface C5b-9 deposition by 11%. (B) Two of five healthy individuals (Ctrl) had markedly increased serum Bb level post vaccination as compared to baseline, which correlated with their vaccine side effects including headache, fatigue and fever. Complement amplification in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 is multifactorial. Our previous data adding recombinant spike protein to normal human serum showed that complement-mediated cell killing was almost entirely through the alternative complement pathway.[17] Here, using serum from patients with COVID-19, we find additional contributions from the non-APC pathways. This may be because serum samples in this study were obtained a median of 7 days after testing positive for COVID-19, at a time when the SARS-CoV-2 viral load is decreasing,[3,31] as opposed to measuring cell surface C5b-9 deposition within minutes after adding spike protein to normal human serum. We also demonstrated that mHam positivity (measuring the activation of all complement pathways) from SARS-CoV-2 infected patients is associated with the need for mechanical ventilation; however, we did not find as strong a correlation between cell surface C5b-9 and the mHam as we did after supplementing normal human serum with the spike protein. Proposed model for complement dysregulation in SARS-CoV-2 infection. Early in infection, the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein binds heparan sulfate on the endothelial cell surface and interferes with the inhibitory function of complement factor H (CFH), leading to alternative pathway of complement dysregulation. Suppression of CFH binding results in increased cleavage of factor B by factor D and generation of Bb. Factor Bb binds to C3b to form the alternative pathway C3 convertase (C3bBb), leading to the cleavage of C3 and generation of the C5 convertase (C4b2a3b or C3bBb3b). The C5 convertase cleaves C5 to generate C5a and C5b, which complexes with C6-9 to form the membrane attack complex (C5b-9). C3a and C5a are anaphylatoxins that recruit inflammatory cells and upregulate the expression of acute phase proteins, such as C-reactive protein. Complement amplification from the classical and lectin pathways follows subsequent tissue damage, secondary infections and thromboses. Formation of antibody-antigen complexes can activate the classical complement pathway by binding to the C1 complex and cleaving C4 and C2 to form the classical C3 convertase (C4b2a). In the lectin pathway, MBL-MASP binds to carbohydrates on the surface of microbes and mediates the cleavage of C2 and C4, to generate the C3 convertase (C4b2a). Preconditions that enhance inflammation (e.g., obesity, diabetes, and vascular disease) or contribute to complement activation (e.g., third-trimester pregnancy) or dysregulation (age-related macular degeneration and other germline complement mutations) may contribute to a severe phenotype through upregulation of these pathways. HS: heparan sulfate; MBL-MASP: mannose-binding protein-mannose-binding lectin serine protease; CRP: C-reactive protein. Virtually all patients had elevated levels of Bb in their serum, even two of the healthy subjects after COVID-19 mRNA vaccination, suggesting that APC activation is an early event in the pathogenesis of SARS-CoV-2 infection. This is in agreement with the prominent role for APC found in proteomics studies, which showed increased complement factor B (CFB) levels in serum from severe COVID-19 patients.[32] CFB deposition was also observed in the lung tissue of COVID-19 patients, and a CFB inhibitor blocked the C3a generated by infection of respiratory epithelial cells with SARS-CoV-2.[33,34] Pekayvaz et al.[35] further showed upregulation of complement factor D (CFD), produced mainly in adipocytes, in monocytes of severe COVID-19 patients. Ma et al.[36] demonstrated that enhanced activation of the APC is associated with markers of endothelial injury and hypercoagulability in severe COVID-19 patients as compared to other non-COVID-19 patients admitted to the intensive care unit with acute respiratory failure. C5b-9 deposition induced by COVID-19 patient serum is blocked by both a terminal complement inhibitor (anti- C5 antibody) and an alternative pathway specific inhibitor (factor D inhibitor, ACH145951). The factor D inhibitor was more effective in blocking C3c deposition induced by COVID-19 patient serum as compared to the anti-C5 antibody. These results are supported by observations from case series of eculizumab, a monoclonal anti-C5 antibody, in which treated COVID-19 patients showed significant improvements in clinical parameters.[12,13] However, the phase III trial of eculizumab (clinicaltrials gov. Identifier: NCT04355494) in COVID-19 patients on mechanical ventilation was paused due to interim analysis of 122 patients showing that the drug did not meet its prespecified efficacy outcome of survival on day 29. Final results from this trial are eagerly anticipated as are those for COVID-19 patients who are hospitalized but not on mechanical ventilation. COVID-19 patients may derive benefit from complement inhibition early in their disease course or from more proximal complement inhibition. A comparative study of eculizumab versus AMY-101, an upstream C3 inhibitor, in a small number of patients showed that both decreased inflammatory markers and led to improvements in lung functions. The three patients who received AMY-101 demonstrated greater reduction in plasma levels of C3a, sC5b-9 and CFB as compared to patients who received eculizumab.[37] This limited clinical data in addition to our in vitro results suggests that proximal complement inhibitors may be more effective than terminal inhibitors in reducing COVID-19 disease severity. Notably, treatment of six severely ill COVID-19 patients with Narsoplimab, a monoclonal antibody against MASP-2 inhibiting lectin-pathway activation, showed rapid reduction in serum inflammatory markers and survival in all patients.[38] In addition to the COVID-19 infection itself, there are likely multifactorial contributions from tissue damage, secondary infections, and thrombosis, leading to complement activation from all pathways. Further studies comparing different complement inhibitors would be valuable to identify the most appropriate therapeutic targets. The SARS-CoV-2 spike protein interferes with the function of CFH and this is likely an early event in the pathogenesis of COVID-19. In our prior work, we found that addition of purified CFH protein to serum treated with the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein decreased C3c and C5b-9 deposition on the cell surface.[17] Here, we used competitive immunoprecipitation experiments to show that the SARSCoV- 2 spike protein directly blocks CFH from binding to heparin, which may explain the APC dysregulation observed in COVID-19 infection (Figure 5). When binding to glycosaminoglycans on cell surface, including heparan sulfate, and a2-3 N-linked sialic acid residues, CFH achieves a more active conformation that allows for C3b binding.[39] Interestingly, genetic variants in CFH, that occur in the same region where factor H binds heparan sulfate, have been identified as an important risk factor for morbidity and mortality from COVID-19.[27] COVID-19 vaccines lead to the transient expression of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and are effective in preventing severe infection.[40,41] Our vaccine studies (Figure 6) are reassuring that mRNA vaccines should not induce clinically significant complement amplification in healthy individuals, as suggested by the negative results from our functional assays; however, more data is necessary in patients with disorders of complement regulation, such as paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH), aHUS, CAPS, HELLP and cold agglutinin disease.[42] Relapse of aHUS has been reported in patients with COVID-19 infection, [43] and PNH patients have experienced adverse reactions to COVID-19 vaccines including severe hemolysis and need for blood transfusions even while on a C5 inhibitor.[44] This evidence suggests that although complement activation induced by COVID-19 vaccines is wellcontrolled in healthy individuals, patients with disorders of complement regulation could be at higher risk for adverse reactions to vaccine. Limitations of our study are that we received a limited amounts of patient serum for experiments and were unable to test other complement markers such as C4d deposition on the cell surface. We also had limited access to clinical information from which to draw robust conclusions regarding the association of complement activation with clinical parameters. Further, serum sample collection was not standardized and occurred at different time points from the initial diagnosis of COVID-19 and hospital admission. For example, in one of the two patients who died due to multiorgan failure from COVID-19, serum was collected near the end of his clinical course, at which point peak amplification of complement may have passed. Finally, we do not have serial samples from patients to estimate the persistence of complement activation over time. In future studies, it will be important to do serial mHam, Bb, and surface C5b-9 deposition studies starting soon after infection and correlating with SARS-CoV-2 viral load. In summary, we showed that COVID-19 patient serum can induce complement dysregulation on cell surfaces that tracks with disease severity. Our previous data showed that the SARS-CoV-2 spike proteins convert inactivator surfaces to activator surfaces. Taken together, we postulate that dysregulation of the APC is likely an early event after SARS-CoV-2 infection. Complement amplification from classical and lectin pathways following tissue damage, secondary infections, and thrombosis likely exacerbate end-organ damage similar to severe forms of aHUS and CAPS (Figure 7). Preconditions that lead to inflammation (e.g., obesity, diabetes and vascular disease) or contribute to complement activation (e.g., third-trimester pregnancy) or dysregulation (age-related macular degeneration and other germline complement mutations) may contribute to a severe phenotype. Indeed, components of the APC (CFB, CFD, and C3) are elevated in patients with obesity and insulin resistance.[45] Prospective studies correlating SARS-CoV-2 viral load to complement-mediated cell damage over the course of infection and additional genetic studies probing for rare variants in complement regulatory genes are needed. Our data also suggest that for complement inhibitors to be most effective, they should be initiated early in the disease process, but this too requires prospective study, as is the subject of the ongoing TACTIC-R study (clinical trials gov. Identifier: NCT04390464).[46]
Figure 7.

Proposed model for complement dysregulation in SARS-CoV-2 infection. Early in infection, the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein binds heparan sulfate on the endothelial cell surface and interferes with the inhibitory function of complement factor H (CFH), leading to alternative pathway of complement dysregulation. Suppression of CFH binding results in increased cleavage of factor B by factor D and generation of Bb. Factor Bb binds to C3b to form the alternative pathway C3 convertase (C3bBb), leading to the cleavage of C3 and generation of the C5 convertase (C4b2a3b or C3bBb3b). The C5 convertase cleaves C5 to generate C5a and C5b, which complexes with C6-9 to form the membrane attack complex (C5b-9). C3a and C5a are anaphylatoxins that recruit inflammatory cells and upregulate the expression of acute phase proteins, such as C-reactive protein. Complement amplification from the classical and lectin pathways follows subsequent tissue damage, secondary infections and thromboses. Formation of antibody-antigen complexes can activate the classical complement pathway by binding to the C1 complex and cleaving C4 and C2 to form the classical C3 convertase (C4b2a). In the lectin pathway, MBL-MASP binds to carbohydrates on the surface of microbes and mediates the cleavage of C2 and C4, to generate the C3 convertase (C4b2a). Preconditions that enhance inflammation (e.g., obesity, diabetes, and vascular disease) or contribute to complement activation (e.g., third-trimester pregnancy) or dysregulation (age-related macular degeneration and other germline complement mutations) may contribute to a severe phenotype through upregulation of these pathways. HS: heparan sulfate; MBL-MASP: mannose-binding protein-mannose-binding lectin serine protease; CRP: C-reactive protein.

  44 in total

Review 1.  Analysis of the Complement System in the Clinical Immunology Laboratory.

Authors:  Morris Ling; Mandakolathur Murali
Journal:  Clin Lab Med       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 1.935

Review 2.  Complementopathies and precision medicine.

Authors:  Eleni Gavriilaki; Robert A Brodsky
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 14.808

3.  Germline mutations in the alternative pathway of complement predispose to HELLP syndrome.

Authors:  Arthur J Vaught; Evan M Braunstein; Jagar Jasem; Xuan Yuan; Igor Makhlin; Solange Eloundou; Andrea C Baines; Samuel A Merrill; Shruti Chaturvedi; Karin Blakemore; C John Sperati; Robert A Brodsky
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2018-03-22

4.  Ex vivo assays to detect complement activation in complementopathies.

Authors:  Xuan Yuan; Jia Yu; Gloria Gerber; Shruti Chaturvedi; Michael Cole; Hang Chen; Ara Metjian; C John Sperati; Evan M Braunstein; Robert A Brodsky
Journal:  Clin Immunol       Date:  2020-10-24       Impact factor: 3.969

5.  The first case of COVID-19 treated with the complement C3 inhibitor AMY-101.

Authors:  Sara Mastaglio; Annalisa Ruggeri; Antonio M Risitano; Piera Angelillo; Despina Yancopoulou; Dimitrios C Mastellos; Markus Huber-Lang; Simona Piemontese; Andrea Assanelli; Cecilia Garlanda; John D Lambris; Fabio Ciceri
Journal:  Clin Immunol       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 3.969

6.  Complement Activation in the Disease Course of Coronavirus Disease 2019 and Its Effects on Clinical Outcomes.

Authors:  Aline H de Nooijer; Inge Grondman; Nico A F Janssen; Mihai G Netea; Loek Willems; Frank L van de Veerdonk; Evangelos J Giamarellos-Bourboulis; Erik J M Toonen; Leo A B Joosten
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 5.226

7.  Chromosome 3 cluster rs11385942 variant links complement activation with severe COVID-19.

Authors:  Luca Valenti; Samantha Griffini; Giuseppe Lamorte; Elena Grovetti; Sara Colonia Uceda Renteria; Francesco Malvestiti; Luigia Scudeller; Alessandra Bandera; Flora Peyvandi; Daniele Prati; Pierluigi Meroni; Massimo Cugno
Journal:  J Autoimmun       Date:  2021-01-09       Impact factor: 7.094

8.  Viral kinetics of SARS-CoV-2 over the preclinical, clinical, and postclinical period.

Authors:  Sukbin Jang; Ji-Young Rhee; Yu Mi Wi; Bo Kyeung Jung
Journal:  Int J Infect Dis       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 3.623

9.  Complement C3 vs C5 inhibition in severe COVID-19: Early clinical findings reveal differential biological efficacy.

Authors:  Dimitrios C Mastellos; Bruno G P Pires da Silva; Benedito A L Fonseca; Natasha P Fonseca; Maria Auxiliadora-Martins; Sara Mastaglio; Annalisa Ruggeri; Marina Sironi; Peter Radermacher; Akrivi Chrysanthopoulou; Panagiotis Skendros; Konstantinos Ritis; Ilenia Manfra; Simona Iacobelli; Markus Huber-Lang; Bo Nilsson; Despina Yancopoulou; E Sander Connolly; Cecilia Garlanda; Fabio Ciceri; Antonio M Risitano; Rodrigo T Calado; John D Lambris
Journal:  Clin Immunol       Date:  2020-09-19       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  SARS-CoV-2 Infection Depends on Cellular Heparan Sulfate and ACE2.

Authors:  Thomas Mandel Clausen; Daniel R Sandoval; Charlotte B Spliid; Jessica Pihl; Hailee R Perrett; Chelsea D Painter; Anoop Narayanan; Sydney A Majowicz; Elizabeth M Kwong; Rachael N McVicar; Bryan E Thacker; Charles A Glass; Zhang Yang; Jonathan L Torres; Gregory J Golden; Phillip L Bartels; Ryan N Porell; Aaron F Garretson; Logan Laubach; Jared Feldman; Xin Yin; Yuan Pu; Blake M Hauser; Timothy M Caradonna; Benjamin P Kellman; Cameron Martino; Philip L S M Gordts; Sumit K Chanda; Aaron G Schmidt; Kamil Godula; Sandra L Leibel; Joyce Jose; Kevin D Corbett; Andrew B Ward; Aaron F Carlin; Jeffrey D Esko
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 41.582

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  The state of complement in COVID-19.

Authors:  Behdad Afzali; Marina Noris; Bart N Lambrecht; Claudia Kemper
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 108.555

2.  Fatal thrombotic microangiopathy with rhabdomyolysis as an initial symptom after the first dose of mRNA-1273 vaccine: A case report.

Authors:  Yuya Kamura; Toshiki Terao; Satoshi Akao; Yumi Kono; Koichi Honma; Kosei Matsue
Journal:  Int J Infect Dis       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 12.074

Review 3.  Complement-mediated microvascular injury and thrombosis in the pathogenesis of severe COVID-19: A review.

Authors:  Panagiota Gianni; Mark Goldin; Sam Ngu; Stefanos Zafeiropoulos; Georgios Geropoulos; Dimitrios Giannis
Journal:  World J Exp Med       Date:  2022-07-20

Review 4.  Complement activation in COVID-19 and targeted therapeutic options: A scoping review.

Authors:  Endry Hartono Taslim Lim; Rombout Benjamin Ezra van Amstel; Vieve Victoria de Boer; Lonneke Alette van Vught; Sanne de Bruin; Matthijs Christian Brouwer; Alexander Petrus Johannes Vlaar; Diederik van de Beek
Journal:  Blood Rev       Date:  2022-07-30       Impact factor: 10.626

5.  Serum Proteome Signatures of Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Vaccinated Healthcare Workers in Greece Associated with Their Prior Infection Status.

Authors:  Eleni Stamoula; Eleana Sarantidi; Vasilis Dimakopoulos; Alexandra Ainatzoglou; Ioannis Dardalas; Georgios Papazisis; Konstantina Kontopoulou; Athanasios K Anagnostopoulos
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-09-05       Impact factor: 6.208

6.  Combining Deep Phenotyping of Serum Proteomics and Clinical Data via Machine Learning for COVID-19 Biomarker Discovery.

Authors:  Antonio Paolo Beltrami; Maria De Martino; Emiliano Dalla; Matilde Clarissa Malfatti; Federica Caponnetto; Marta Codrich; Daniele Stefanizzi; Martina Fabris; Emanuela Sozio; Federica D'Aurizio; Carlo E M Pucillo; Leonardo A Sechi; Carlo Tascini; Francesco Curcio; Gian Luca Foresti; Claudio Piciarelli; Axel De Nardin; Gianluca Tell; Miriam Isola
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-08-15       Impact factor: 6.208

7.  Genetic and immunologic evaluation of children with inborn errors of immunity and severe or critical COVID-19.

Authors:  Hassan Abolhassani; Samaneh Delavari; Nils Landegren; Sima Shokri; Paul Bastard; Likun Du; Fanglei Zuo; Reza Hajebi; Farhad Abolnezhadian; Sara Iranparast; Mohammadreza Modaresi; Ahmad Vosughimotlagh; Fereshte Salami; Maribel Aranda-Guillén; Aurélie Cobat; Harold Marcotte; Shen-Ying Zhang; Qian Zhang; Nima Rezaei; Jean-Laurent Casanova; Olle Kämpe; Lennart Hammarström; Qiang Pan-Hammarström
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2022-09-13       Impact factor: 14.290

8.  Genetic prediction of ICU hospitalization and mortality in COVID-19 patients using artificial neural networks.

Authors:  Panagiotis G Asteris; Eleni Gavriilaki; Tasoula Touloumenidou; Evaggelia-Evdoxia Koravou; Maria Koutra; Penelope Georgia Papayanni; Alexandros Pouleres; Vassiliki Karali; Minas E Lemonis; Anna Mamou; Athanasia D Skentou; Apostolia Papalexandri; Christos Varelas; Fani Chatzopoulou; Maria Chatzidimitriou; Dimitrios Chatzidimitriou; Anastasia Veleni; Evdoxia Rapti; Ioannis Kioumis; Evaggelos Kaimakamis; Milly Bitzani; Dimitrios Boumpas; Argyris Tsantes; Damianos Sotiropoulos; Anastasia Papadopoulou; Ioannis G Kalantzis; Lydia A Vallianatou; Danial J Armaghani; Liborio Cavaleri; Amir H Gandomi; Mohsen Hajihassani; Mahdi Hasanipanah; Mohammadreza Koopialipoor; Paulo B Lourenço; Pijush Samui; Jian Zhou; Ioanna Sakellari; Serena Valsami; Marianna Politou; Styliani Kokoris; Achilles Anagnostopoulos
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2022-01-22       Impact factor: 5.310

9.  Is Better Standardization of Therapeutic Antibody Quality in Emerging Diseases Epidemics Possible?

Authors:  Sanda Ravlić; Ana Hećimović; Tihana Kurtović; Jelena Ivančić Jelečki; Dubravko Forčić; Anamarija Slović; Ivan Christian Kurolt; Željka Mačak Šafranko; Tatjana Mušlin; Dina Rnjak; Ozren Jakšić; Ena Sorić; Gorana Džepina; Oktavija Đaković Rode; Kristina Kujavec Šljivac; Tomislav Vuk; Irena Jukić; Alemka Markotić; Beata Halassy
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 7.561

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.