Literature DB >> 34289319

Development and validation of a multiparametric MRI-based radiomics signature for distinguishing between indolent and aggressive prostate cancer.

Liuhui Zhang1,2, Donggen Jiang1, Chujie Chen1, Xiangwei Yang1, Hanqi Lei1, Zhuang Kang3, Hai Huang2, Jun Pang1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a non-invasive MRI-based radiomics signature for distinguishing between indolent and aggressive prostate cancer (PCa) prior to therapy.
METHODS: In all, 139 qualified and pathology-confirmed PCa patients were divided into a training set (n = 93) and a validation set (n = 46). A total of 1576 radiomics features were extracted from the T2WI (n = 788) and diffusion-weighted imaging (n = 788) for each patient. The Select K Best and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression algorithm were used to construct a radiomics signature in the training set. The predictive performance of the radiomics signature was assessed in the training set and then validated in the validation set by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. We computed the calibration curve and the decision curve to evaluate the calibration and clinical usefulness of the signature.
RESULTS: Nine radiomics features were identified to form the radiomics signature. The radiomics score (Rad-score) was significantly different between indolent and aggressive PCa (p < 0.001). The radiomics signature exhibited favorable discrimination between the indolent and aggressive PCa groups in the training set (AUC: 0.853, 95% CI: 0.766 to 0.941) and validation set (AUC: 0.901, 95% CI: 0.793 to 1.000). The decision curve analysis showed that a greater net benefit would be obtained when the threshold probability ranged from 20 to 90%.
CONCLUSION: The multiparametric MRI-based radiomics signature can potentially serve as a non-invasive tool for distinguishing between indolent and aggressive PCa prior to therapy. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: The multiparametric MRI-based radiomics signature has the potential to non-invasively distinguish between the indolent and aggressive PCa, which might aid clinicians in making personalized therapeutic decisions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34289319      PMCID: PMC8978240          DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20210191

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  39 in total

1.  Radiomic features from pretreatment biparametric MRI predict prostate cancer biochemical recurrence: Preliminary findings.

Authors:  Rakesh Shiradkar; Soumya Ghose; Ivan Jambor; Pekka Taimen; Otto Ettala; Andrei S Purysko; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Computed diffusion-weighted imaging of the prostate at 3 T: impact on image quality and tumour detection.

Authors:  Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Hersh Chandarana; Nicole Hindman; Fang-Ming Deng; James S Babb; Samir S Taneja; Christian Geppert
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  mRNA expression signature of Gleason grade predicts lethal prostate cancer.

Authors:  Kathryn L Penney; Jennifer A Sinnott; Katja Fall; Yudi Pawitan; Yujin Hoshida; Peter Kraft; Jennifer R Stark; Michelangelo Fiorentino; Sven Perner; Stephen Finn; Stefano Calza; Richard Flavin; Matthew L Freedman; Sunita Setlur; Howard D Sesso; Swen-Olof Andersson; Neil Martin; Philip W Kantoff; Jan-Erik Johansson; Hans-Olov Adami; Mark A Rubin; Massimo Loda; Todd R Golub; Ove Andrén; Meir J Stampfer; Lorelei A Mucci
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-05-02       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 4.  Early detection of prostate cancer in 2007. Part 1: PSA and PSA kinetics.

Authors:  Fritz H Schröder; H Ballentine Carter; Tineke Wolters; Roderick C N van den Bergh; Claartje Gosselaar; Chris H Bangma; Monique J Roobol
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2007-11-05       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.

Authors:  Freddie Bray; Jacques Ferlay; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Rebecca L Siegel; Lindsey A Torre; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 6.  Molecular Imaging of Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Andreas G Wibmer; Irene A Burger; Evis Sala; Hedvig Hricak; Wolfgang A Weber; Hebert Alberto Vargas
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2015-11-20       Impact factor: 5.333

7.  Computational Radiomics System to Decode the Radiographic Phenotype.

Authors:  Joost J M van Griethuysen; Andriy Fedorov; Chintan Parmar; Ahmed Hosny; Nicole Aucoin; Vivek Narayan; Regina G H Beets-Tan; Jean-Christophe Fillion-Robin; Steve Pieper; Hugo J W L Aerts
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Objective risk stratification of prostate cancer using machine learning and radiomics applied to multiparametric magnetic resonance images.

Authors:  Bino Varghese; Frank Chen; Darryl Hwang; Suzanne L Palmer; Andre Luis De Castro Abreu; Osamu Ukimura; Monish Aron; Manju Aron; Inderbir Gill; Vinay Duddalwar; Gaurav Pandey
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Prostate Cancer Differentiation and Aggressiveness: Assessment With a Radiomic-Based Model vs. PI-RADS v2.

Authors:  Tong Chen; Mengjuan Li; Yuefan Gu; Yueyue Zhang; Shuo Yang; Chaogang Wei; Jiangfen Wu; Xin Li; Wenlu Zhao; Junkang Shen
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 4.813

View more
  5 in total

1.  Innovations in prostate cancer: introductory editorial.

Authors:  Jurgen J Fütterer; Chan Kyo Kim; Daniel J Margolis
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2022-03       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  More than Meets the Eye: Using Textural Analysis and Artificial Intelligence as Decision Support Tools in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis-A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Teodora Telecan; Iulia Andras; Nicolae Crisan; Lorin Giurgiu; Emanuel Darius Căta; Cosmin Caraiani; Andrei Lebovici; Bianca Boca; Zoltan Balint; Laura Diosan; Monica Lupsor-Platon
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-06-16

3.  Utility of Clinical-Radiomic Model to Identify Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Biparametric MRI PI-RADS V2.1 Category 3 Lesions.

Authors:  Pengfei Jin; Liqin Yang; Xiaomeng Qiao; Chunhong Hu; Chenhan Hu; Ximing Wang; Jie Bao
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 4.  Radiomics in prostate cancer: an up-to-date review.

Authors:  Matteo Ferro; Ottavio de Cobelli; Gennaro Musi; Francesco Del Giudice; Giuseppe Carrieri; Gian Maria Busetto; Ugo Giovanni Falagario; Alessandro Sciarra; Martina Maggi; Felice Crocetto; Biagio Barone; Vincenzo Francesco Caputo; Michele Marchioni; Giuseppe Lucarelli; Ciro Imbimbo; Francesco Alessandro Mistretta; Stefano Luzzago; Mihai Dorin Vartolomei; Luigi Cormio; Riccardo Autorino; Octavian Sabin Tătaru
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2022-07-04

5.  Prediction of clinically significant prostate cancer with a multimodal MRI-based radiomics nomogram.

Authors:  Guodong Jing; Pengyi Xing; Zhihui Li; Xiaolu Ma; Haidi Lu; Chengwei Shao; Yong Lu; Jianping Lu; Fu Shen
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 5.738

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.