Literature DB >> 34288760

Binocular Accommodation and Vergence Dysfunction in Children Attending Online Classes During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Digital Eye Strain in Kids (DESK) Study-2.

Amit Mohan, Pradhnya Sen, Chintan Shah, Krashan Datt, Elesh Jain.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To subjectively evaluate the degree of visual fatigue in children attending online classes during the coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and objectively evaluate accommodation and vergence dysfunction in these children.
METHODS: Children aged between 10 and 17 years with recent onset of asthenopia symptoms were included. Symptoms were evaluated using the Convergence Insufficiency Symptom Survey (CISS) questionnaire. A CISS score of 16 or greater was considered symptomatic. Binocular vergence and accommodation parameters were objectively evaluated. For ease of comparison, children were divided into two groups: children using digital devices for less than 4 hours/day and children using digital devices for 4 hours/day or more.
RESULTS: A total of 46 children with a mean age of 14.47 ± 1.95 years were evaluated. The mean duration of online classes during the COVID-19 pandemic was 3.08 ± 1.68 hours/day, which is higher than before the COVID-19 pandemic (0.58 ± 0.71 hours/day, P < .00001). The mean CISS scores were 21.73 ± 12.81 for children using digital devices less than 4 hours/day and 30.34 ± 13.0 for children using digital devices for 4 hours/day or more (P = .019). Mean near exophoria (P = .03), negative fusional vergence (P = .02), negative relative accommodation (P = .057), and accommodation amplitude (P = .002) were different between the two groups. The Spearman correlation between the symptomatic CISS score and the duration of online classes showed a linear association (coefficient rs = 0.39; P = .007). In the multivariate analysis, only the duration of online classes longer than 4 hours was a significant risk factor (P = .07) for the symptomatic CISS score.
CONCLUSIONS: Online classes longer than 4 hours were more detrimental to abnormal binocular vergence and accommodation parameters than online classes shorter than 4 hours. [J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2021;58(4):224-231.].

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34288760     DOI: 10.3928/01913913-20210217-02

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus        ISSN: 0191-3913            Impact factor:   1.402


  5 in total

1.  Binocular vision findings in normally-sighted school aged children who used digital devices.

Authors:  Urusha Maharjan; Sujata Rijal; Ashutosh Jnawali; Sanjeeta Sitaula; Sanjeev Bhattarai; Gulshan Bahadur Shrestha
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Digital Eye Strain Caused by Online Education Among Children in Qassim Region, Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Abdulrhman Aldukhayel; Samah M Baqar; Fatimah K Almeathem; Fatimah S Alsultan; Ghadah A AlHarbi
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-04-04

3.  Effects of remote learning during the COVID-19 lockdown on children's visual health: a systematic review.

Authors:  María Camila Cortés-Albornoz; Sofía Ramírez-Guerrero; William Rojas-Carabali; Alejandra de-la-Torre; Claudia Talero-Gutiérrez
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 3.006

Review 4.  Digital Eye Strain- A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  Kirandeep Kaur; Bharat Gurnani; Swatishree Nayak; Nilutparna Deori; Savleen Kaur; Jitendra Jethani; Digvijay Singh; Sumita Agarkar; Jameel Rizwana Hussaindeen; Jaspreet Sukhija; Deepak Mishra
Journal:  Ophthalmol Ther       Date:  2022-07-09

Review 5.  Can Nutrition Play a Role in Ameliorating Digital Eye Strain?

Authors:  Drake W Lem; Dennis L Gierhart; Pinakin Gunvant Davey
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-09-27       Impact factor: 6.706

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.