Literature DB >> 34287702

How 3D printing can boost advances in analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.

Adriano Ambrosi1, Alessandra Bonanni2,3.   

Abstract

3D printing fabrication methods have received lately an enormous attention by the scientific community. Laboratories and research groups working on analytical chemistry applications, among others, have advantageously adopted 3D printing to fabricate a wide range of tools, from common laboratory hardware to fluidic systems, sample treatment platforms, sensing structures, and complete fully functional analytical devices. This technology is becoming more affordable over time and therefore preferred over the commonly used fabrication processes like hot embossing, soft lithography, injection molding and micromilling. However, to better exploit 3D printing fabrication methods, it is important to fully understand their benefits and limitations which are also directly associated to the properties of the materials used for printing. Costs, printing resolution, chemical and biological compatibility of the materials, design complexity, robustness of the printed object, and integration with commercially available systems represent important aspects to be weighted in relation to the intended task. In this review, a useful introductory summary of the most commonly used 3D printing systems and mechanisms is provided before the description of the most recent trends of the use of 3D printing for analytical and bioanalytical chemistry. Concluding remarks will be also given together with a brief discussion of possible future directions.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D printing; Additive manufacturing; Analytical chemistry; Biosensing; Electrochemistry; Electrode printing; Microfluidics; Optical sensing

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34287702     DOI: 10.1007/s00604-021-04901-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mikrochim Acta        ISSN: 0026-3672            Impact factor:   5.833


  47 in total

Review 1.  The upcoming 3D-printing revolution in microfluidics.

Authors:  Nirveek Bhattacharjee; Arturo Urrios; Shawn Kang; Albert Folch
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 6.799

2.  Recent Advances in Analytical Chemistry by 3D Printing.

Authors:  Bethany Gross; Sarah Y Lockwood; Dana M Spence
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 6.986

3.  Polymer Coatings in 3D-Printed Fluidic Device Channels for Improved Cellular Adherence Prior to Electrical Lysis.

Authors:  Bethany C Gross; Kari B Anderson; Jayda E Meisel; Megan I McNitt; Dana M Spence
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 6.986

4.  Evaluation of 3D printing and its potential impact on biotechnology and the chemical sciences.

Authors:  Bethany C Gross; Jayda L Erkal; Sarah Y Lockwood; Chengpeng Chen; Dana M Spence
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 6.986

5.  3D-printing technologies for electrochemical applications.

Authors:  Adriano Ambrosi; Martin Pumera
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 54.564

Review 6.  3D printed microfluidic devices: enablers and barriers.

Authors:  Sidra Waheed; Joan M Cabot; Niall P Macdonald; Trevor Lewis; Rosanne M Guijt; Brett Paull; Michael C Breadmore
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 6.799

7.  Comparing Microfluidic Performance of Three-Dimensional (3D) Printing Platforms.

Authors:  Niall P Macdonald; Joan M Cabot; Petr Smejkal; Rosanne M Guijt; Brett Paull; Michael C Breadmore
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 6.986

8.  [Prognostic value of bad distal irrigation incides, revealed by irrigraphy in arteritis of the lower limbs (author's transl)].

Authors:  P Langeron; J Harle; F Asseman-Leclercq
Journal:  J Mal Vasc       Date:  1981

9.  Fused Deposition Modeling 3D Printing for (Bio)analytical Device Fabrication: Procedures, Materials, and Applications.

Authors:  Gert Ij Salentijn; Pieter E Oomen; Maciej Grajewski; Elisabeth Verpoorte
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 6.986

10.  Revealing interactions of layered polymeric materials at solid-liquid interface for building solvent compatibility charts for 3D printing applications.

Authors:  Kirill S Erokhin; Evgeniy G Gordeev; Valentine P Ananikov
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-27       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  1 in total

1.  3D printed spinning cup-shaped device for immunoaffinity solid-phase extraction of diclofenac in wastewaters.

Authors:  Enrique Javier Carrasco-Correa; José Manuel Herrero-Martínez; Ernesto Francisco Simó-Alfonso; Dietmar Knopp; Manuel Miró
Journal:  Mikrochim Acta       Date:  2022-04-02       Impact factor: 6.408

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.