Literature DB >> 34287656

Can the mini-sling become the golden standard for treating stress urinary incontinence? Comment: The TFS retropubic tensioned minisling for SUI-a 14 year experience with high long-term RCT cure.

H Inoue1, Y Sekiguchi2, R Nakamura2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34287656      PMCID: PMC8455488          DOI: 10.1007/s00192-021-04922-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN: 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


× No keyword cloud information.
Dear Editor We read the recent article by Cheng-Yu Long et al. with interest [1]. The data since publication of the first midurethral minisling in 2005 by Petros and Richardson [2] support the editorial statement [1]. The first midurethral minisling was, and remains, a tensioned retropubic sling. Since then, it has been validated by a 5-year RCT by Sivaslioglu who compared the TFS minisling with a TOT (transobturator tape) [3] with objective cure rates of 75% and 83% TFS at 5 years. There was one TOT erosion (2.5%) and one TFS anchor displacement in the left side. The anchor was removed under local anesthesia, and the patient remained continent. Since 2006, our Japanese group has performed > 500 TFS minisling operations for stress urinary incontinence (SUI). We reported 90% 3-year SUI cure for TFS minisling with no erosions [4]. Five patients needed indwelling catheters, and all five patients voided without difficulty within 2 days. There were no intraoperative complications and no erosions within the 3 years. We also reported 90.9% cure at 12 months for women with intrinsic sphincter defect (ISD) (patients with maximum urethral closure pressure < 20) [5]. There was one intraoperative bladder perforation, but no erosions. All our operations were performed under local anesthetic (LA)/sedation with same-day discharge. All operations were performed with a third-generation non-stretch lightweight tape. The TFS minisling is unique in that it is retropubic and uses a one-way tensioned tape. As such, it can be tightened millimeter by millimeter to obtain the precise tension required for closure with minimal postoperative urinary retention, an important consideration for ISD [5]. The minimal nature of the operation allows it to be done under LA. Furthermore, reports of a retropubic being superior to TOT for repeat surgery give this method an added advantage over the TOT minislings.
  5 in total

1.  A prospective randomized controlled trial of the transobturator tape and tissue fixation mini-sling in patients with stress urinary incontinence: 5-year results.

Authors:  Ahmet Akin Sivaslioglu; Eylem Unlubilgin; Serpil Aydogmus; Levent Keskin; Ismail Dolen
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Retropubic tissue fixation system tensioned mini-sling carried out under local anesthesia cures stress urinary incontinence and intrinsic sphincter deficiency: 1-year data.

Authors:  Ryoko Nakamura; Masahiro Yao; Yoshiko Maeda; Akiko Fujisaki; Yuki Sekiguchi
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  2017-05-14       Impact factor: 3.369

3.  Can the mini-sling become the golden standard for treating stress urinary incontinence?

Authors:  Cheng-Yu Long; Gin-Den Chen; Rebecca G Rogers
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Midurethral Tissue Fixation System sling -- a 'micromethod' for cure of stress incontinence -- preliminary report.

Authors:  Peter E P Petros; Peter A Richardson
Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.100

5.  Outpatient mid-urethral tissue fixation system sling for urodynamic stress urinary incontinence: 3-year surgical and quality of life results.

Authors:  Ryoko Nakamura; Masahiro Yao; Yoshiko Maeda; Akiko Fujisaki; Yuki Sekiguchi
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 2.894

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.