Literature DB >> 22591959

A prospective randomized controlled trial of the transobturator tape and tissue fixation mini-sling in patients with stress urinary incontinence: 5-year results.

Ahmet Akin Sivaslioglu1, Eylem Unlubilgin, Serpil Aydogmus, Levent Keskin, Ismail Dolen.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We present the 5-year results of a randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy of a transobturator tape operation with an adjustable mini-sling (tissue fixation system) for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective randomized controlled trial comprised 80 female patients with only urodynamically proven stress urinary incontinence. The participants were randomly allocated to the transobturator tape group or the tissue fixation system group according to a computer program at a maternity research hospital. The patients were reassessed 5 years after surgery. Primary outcome measures were objective and subjective cure rates as well as total failure rate.
RESULTS: Total followup was 64 months (range 58 to 70). The objective cure, subjective cure and failure rates in the tissue fixation system group were 83% (30 cases), 6% (2) and 11% (4), respectively. The objective cure, subjective cure and failure rates in the transobturator tape group were 75% (27 cases), 3% (1) and 22% (8), respectively. The difference in objective cure rates was statistically significant in favor of the tissue fixation system (p = 0.029). The difference in decreased cure rates between 5 and 3 years was 7% (90% to 83%) for the tissue fixation system vs 9% (84% to 75%) for the transobturator tape. The relative decrease in cure rates between the 2 groups was not statistically significant (p = 0.16).
CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to reports in the literature of poor results with mini-slings, the tissue fixation system mini-sling demonstrated a higher cure rate and lower complication rate than the transobturator tape.
Copyright © 2012 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22591959     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.02.2564

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  23 in total

1.  Is there any place for a transobturator approach for minisling surgery?

Authors:  Ahmet Akin Sivaslioglu
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Decreasing transobturator sling groin pain without decreasing efficacy using TVT-Abbrevo.

Authors:  Jonathan S Shaw; Peter C Jeppson; Charles R Rardin
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 3.  Medium-term and long-term outcomes following placement of midurethral slings for stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review and metaanalysis.

Authors:  Giovanni A Tommaselli; Costantino Di Carlo; Carmen Formisano; Annamaria Fabozzi; Carmine Nappi
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Not all minislings are alike.

Authors:  Ahmet Akin Sivaslioglu
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Diagnosis and office-based treatment of urinary incontinence in adults. Part two: treatment.

Authors:  Anne P Cameron; Masahito Jimbo; Joel J Heidelbaugh
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2013-08

Review 6.  Single-incision sling operations for urinary incontinence in women.

Authors:  Arjun Nambiar; June D Cody; Stephen T Jeffery; Patricia Aluko
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-07-26

7.  A cohort study comparing a single-incision sling with a retropubic midurethral sling.

Authors:  Annetta M Madsen; Sherif A El-Nashar; Joshua L Woelk; Christopher J Klingele; John B Gebhart; Emanuel C Trabuco
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 2.894

8.  A randomized comparison of a single-incision needleless (Contasure-needleless®) mini-sling versus an inside-out transobturator (Contasure-KIM®) mid-urethral sling in women with stress urinary incontinence: 24-month follow-up results.

Authors:  Ozan Dogan; Aski Ellibes Kaya; Cigdem Pulatoglu; Alper Basbug; Murat Yassa
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 9.  Safety considerations for synthetic sling surgery.

Authors:  Jerry G Blaivas; Rajveer S Purohit; Matthew S Benedon; Gabriel Mekel; Michael Stern; Mubashir Billah; Kola Olugbade; Robert Bendavid; Vladimir Iakovlev
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 14.432

10.  Safety and efficacy of single-incision sling for female stress urinary incontinence: 3 years' results.

Authors:  Güner Yildiz; Yasin Ceylan; Oktay Ucer; Deniz Arslan; Orçun Çelik; Bülent Gunlusoy
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 2.894

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.