| Literature DB >> 34287251 |
Dina Di Giacomo1, Federica Guerra1, Katia Cannita2, Anna Di Profio3, Jessica Ranieri1.
Abstract
One side-effect of oncological treatment is chemotherapy-induced alopecia (CIA), a temporary form of hair loss that could influence patients' mental health. Digitised scalp cooling systems are assuming an important role in the clinical setting during adjuvant treatment, promising hair loss prevention and allowing an efficient procedure to reinforce patients' mental health during chemotherapy by avoiding CIA. The present study was carried out through two research protocols: in Research Protocol 1, we conducted a randomised clinical study to evaluate the emotional impact of using scalp cooling technology in women with BC compared with a traditional chemotherapy setting; in Research Protocol 2, we conducted an observational pre-post study involving women with BC diagnosis being under adjuvant chemotherapy in two experimental conditions: no scalp cooling application and scalp cooling application. Seventy-four women undergoing chemotherapy, aged 30-55 years, were enrolled in both research protocols. We investigated oncological patients' psychological dimensions including body image, body appreciation, expectations, and satisfaction with the scalp cooling treatment, with reference to chemotherapy treatment applying the scalp cooling solution. Our data evidenced the need to implement a supportive clinical approach via brief, tailored psychological intervention addressing patients' progressive adaptation to chemotherapy adverse events and their concerns regarding induced alopecia and the value of the scalp cooling system. Patients receiving the innovative chemotherapy probably coped with it by neglecting its physical impact, instead focusing on avoiding alopecia by using the technological solution and neglecting the emotional impact of chemotherapy as a severe pharmacological treatment.Entities:
Keywords: chemotherapy; clinical psychology; oncological patients; psychological treatment; quality of life; scalp cooling system; well-being
Year: 2021 PMID: 34287251 PMCID: PMC8293253 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol28040224
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Curr Oncol ISSN: 1198-0052 Impact factor: 3.677
Figure 1Study Protocol.
Demographic and clinical data of the sample.
| DEMOGRAPHIC INDEXES | POST CHEMOTHERAPY GROUPING | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| DG GROUP | NDG GROUP | Total | |
| EDUCATION | |||
| NO HIGH SCHOOL | 7.15% | 14.28% | 10% |
| 67.85% | 57.15% | 62% | |
| 25% | 28.57% | 28% | |
| MARITAL STATUS | |||
| MARRIED/LIVING WITH | 78.57% | 57.14% | 67.85% |
| 3.57% | 25% | 14.3% | |
| 17.85% | 17.85% | 17.85% | |
| OCCUPATION | |||
| UNEMPLOYED | 14.29% | 42.85% | 28.57% |
| 60.71% | 53.58% | 57.15% | |
| 25% | 3.57% | 14.28% | |
| TNM | |||
| 0 | 3.58% | 8% | 5.4% |
| 35.71% | 47% | 42% | |
| 35.71% | 22.5% | 29.1% | |
| 25% | 22.5% | 23.5% | |
| LUMINAL TYPE | |||
| A | 10.51% | 26% | 18% |
| 7.42% | 66% | 68% | |
| 7.14% | 0% | 4% | |
| 10.71% | 8% | 10% | |
Figure 2CONSORT Flow diagram for Research Protocol 1.
Figure 3Frequencies of distribution of DG and NDG patients in BDI test.
Raw score and one-way ANOVA for Research Protocol.
| TESTS | POST CHEMOTHERAPY GROUPING | F |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DG | NDG | |||
| PDI | 29.7 (±8.0) | 28.1 (±7.4) | 0.62 | 0.43 |
| BDI | 15.0 (±12.4) | 9.0 (±6.8) | 41.8 | 0.02 * |
* p < 0.05.
Figure 4Descriptive Plot for BDI scoring in Post Chemotherapy evaluation.
Demographic data of participants in Research Protocol 2.
| DEMOGRAPHIC INDEXES | PARTICIPANTS |
|---|---|
| EDUCATION | |
| NO HIGH SCHOOL | 2 (9.1%) |
| HIGH SCHOOL DEGREE | 16 (72.72%) |
| UNDERGRADUATE DEGREE | 4 (18.18%) |
| MARITAL STATUS | |
| MARRIED/LIVING WITH PARTNER | 17 (77.27%) |
| SINGLE | 1 (4.55%) |
| DIVORCED/WIDOWED | 4 (18.18%) |
| OCCUPATION | |
| UNEMPLOYED | 1 (4.55%) |
| EMPLOYED | 19 (86.35%) |
| SELF EMPLOYED | 2 (9.1%) |
| TNM | |
| 0 | 2 (9%) |
| 1 | 9 (40.9%) |
| 2 | 5 (22.77%) |
| 3 | 6 (27.33%) |
| LUMINAL TYPE | |
| A | 1 (4.56%) |
| B | 17 (77.27%) |
| HER2 | 1 (4.56%) |
| TRIPLE NEGATIVE | 3 (13.63%) |
Raw Score of Psychological measurements and Repeated Measures ANOVA for Research Protocol 2.
| TEST | TIMEPOINT | RAW SCORE DG | F |
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| χ | sd | |||||
| PDI | T0 | 28.2 | ±7.46 | 0.74 | 0.39 | - |
| T1 | 29.4 | ±8.72 | ||||
| BDI | T0 | 9.7 | ±6.98 | 12.65 | 0.001 * | 0.11 |
| T1 | 17.0 | ±13.13 | ||||
| ESDQ | T0 | 16.0 | ±3.39 | 1.42 | 0.24 | - |
| T1 | 17.0 | ±3.13 | ||||
| MBA (TOTAL) | T0 | 15.5 | ±5.19 | 2.70 | 0.11 | - |
| T1 | 18.0 | ±4.71 | ||||
| MBA (PA INDEX) | T0 | 9.4 | ±3.23 | 1.69 | 0.20 | - |
| T1 | 10.0 | ±2.84 | ||||
| MBA (BI INDEX) | T0 | 7.0 | ±2.80 | 1.08 | 0.31 | - |
| T1 | 7.9 | ±2.68 | ||||
| BIS | T0 | 9.0 | ±8.32 | 4.22 | 0.05 | - |
| T1 | 11.1 | ±8.10 | ||||
| DASS-A | T0 | 9.5 | ±9.19 | 0.05 | 0.81 | - |
| T1 | 9.1 | ±6.80 | ||||
* p < 0.05.
Figure 5Diagram of test-retest evaluation and scatter plot of depression measure for Research Protocol 2.
I-CADS raw score of sample after chemotherapy treatment and t-test one sample.
| Tests | χ | sd |
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I-CADS Self-perception | 16.1 | ±5.72 | 13.2 | 0.01 | 2.82 |
| I-CADS Emotionality | 5.5 | ±2.32 | 11.82 | 0.01 | 2.36 |
| I-CADS Social Engagement | 7.2 | ±3.23 | 10.4 | 0.01 | 2.17 |
| I-cads | 28.8 | ±9.81 | 13.7 | 0.01 | 2.88 |
Correlation Matrix (Pearson’s r) of emotional dimensions of sample at T1.
| ESDQ T1 | DASS-A T1 | BDI - T1 | PDI T1 | MBA T1 | MBA IA T1 | MBA IBI T1 | I-CADS SP | I-CADS E | I-CADS- SE | I-CADS Tot | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESDQ T1 | Pearson's | — | ||||||||||
| — | ||||||||||||
| DASS-A T1 | Pearson's | −0.412 | — | |||||||||
| 0.057 | — | |||||||||||
| BDI - T1 | Pearson's | −0.339 | 0.311 | — | ||||||||
| 0.122 | 0.159 | — | ||||||||||
| PDI T1 | Pearson's | −0.42 | 0.408 | 0.613 ** | — | |||||||
| 0.052 | 0.06 | 0.002 | — | |||||||||
| MBA T1 | Pearson's | −0.591 ** | 0.413 | 0.235 | 0.624 ** | — | ||||||
| 0.004 | 0.056 | 0.292 | 0.002 | — | ||||||||
| MBA IA T1 | Pearson's | −0.568 ** | 0.23 | 0.038 | 0.43 * | 0.86 *** | — | |||||
| 0.006 | 0.302 | 0.867 | 0.046 | <0 .001 | — | |||||||
| MBA IBI T1 | Pearson's | −0.435 * | 0.48 * | 0.372 | 0.637 ** | 0.842 *** | 0.45 * | — | ||||
| 0.043 | 0.024 | 0.088 | 0.001 | <0 .001 | 0.036 | — | ||||||
| I-CADS SP | Pearson's | −0.495 * | 0.482 * | 0.629 ** | 0.639 ** | 0.621 ** | 0.397 | 0.669 *** | — | |||
| 0.019 | 0.023 | 0.002 | 0.001 | 0.002 | 0.067 | < 0.001 | — | |||||
| I-CADS E | Pearson's | −0.276 | 0.08 | 0.585 ** | 0.79 *** | 0.466 * | 0.417 | 0.375 | 0.566 ** | — | ||
| 0.213 | 0.723 | 0.004 | < 0.001 | 0.029 | 0.054 | 0.086 | 0.006 | — | ||||
| I-CADS- SE | Pearson's | −0.369 | 0.234 | 0.314 | 0.418 | 0.5 * | 0.52 * | 0.325 | 0.648 ** | 0.526 * | — | |
| 0.091 | 0.295 | 0.154 | 0.053 | 0.018 | 0.013 | 0.139 | 0.001 | 0.012 | — | |||
| I-CADS Tot | Pearson's | −0.478 * | 0.379 | 0.617 ** | 0.7 *** | 0.652 ** | 0.512 * | 0.6 ** | 0.938 *** | 0.743 *** | 0.827 *** | — |
| 0.024 | 0.082 | 0.002 | <0 .001 | 0.001 | 0.015 | 0.003 | <0 .001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | — |
Note. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.