Literature DB >> 34286373

Assessing trainee performance: ensuring learner control, supporting development, and maximizing assessment moments.

Daniel J Schumacher1, Pim W Teunissen2, Benjamin Kinnear3, Erik W Driessen4.   

Abstract

In this article, the authors provide practical guidance for frontline supervisors' efforts to assess trainee performance. They focus on three areas. First, they argue the importance of promoting learner control in the assessment process, noting that providing learners agency and control can shift the stakes of assessment from high to low and promote a safe environment that facilitates learning. Second, they posit that assessment should be used to support continued development by promoting a relational partnership between trainees and supervisors. This partnership allows supervisors to reinforce desirable aspects of performance, provide real-time support for deficient areas of performance, and sequence learning with the appropriate amount of scaffolding to push trainees from competence (what they can do alone) to capability (what they are able to do with support). Finally, they advocate the importance of optimizing the use of written comments and direct observation while also recognizing that performance is interdependent in efforts to maximize assessment moments.
Conclusion: Using best practices in trainee assessment can help trainees take next steps in their development in a learner-centered partnership with clinical supervisors. What is Known: • Many pediatricians are asked to assess the performance of medical students and residents they work with but few have received formal training in assessment. What is New: • This article presents evidence-based best practices for assessing trainees, including giving trainees agency in the assessment process and focusing on helping trainees take next steps in their development.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical teaching; Competence; Trainee assessment

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34286373     DOI: 10.1007/s00431-021-04182-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Pediatr        ISSN: 0340-6199            Impact factor:   3.183


  10 in total

1.  Broadening perspectives on clinical performance assessment: rethinking the nature of in-training assessment.

Authors:  Marjan J B Govaerts; Cees P M van der Vleuten; Lambert W T Schuwirth; Arno M M Muijtjens
Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract       Date:  2006-11-10       Impact factor: 3.853

Review 2.  The self critical doctor: helping students become more reflective.

Authors:  Erik Driessen; Jan van Tartwijk; Tim Dornan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-04-12

3.  What is wrong with assessment in postgraduate training? Lessons from clinical practice and educational research.

Authors:  Erik Driessen; Fedde Scheele
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 3.650

4.  Developing the master learner: applying learning theory to the learner, the teacher, and the learning environment.

Authors:  Daniel J Schumacher; Robert Englander; Carol Carraccio
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 6.893

5.  Programmatic assessment: From assessment of learning to assessment for learning.

Authors:  Lambert W T Schuwirth; Cees P M Van der Vleuten
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 3.650

6.  Staging a performance: learners' perceptions about direct observation during residency.

Authors:  Kori A LaDonna; Rose Hatala; Lorelei Lingard; Stephane Voyer; Christopher Watling
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 6.251

Review 7.  Using In-Training Evaluation Report (ITER) Qualitative Comments to Assess Medical Students and Residents: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Rose Hatala; Adam P Sawatsky; Nancy Dudek; Shiphra Ginsburg; David A Cook
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 6.893

8.  The false dichotomy of quality and quantity in the discourse around assessment in competency-based education.

Authors:  Olle Ten Cate
Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract       Date:  2014-06-08       Impact factor: 3.853

9.  Stakes in the eye of the beholder: an international study of learners' perceptions within programmatic assessment.

Authors:  Suzanne Schut; Erik Driessen; Jan van Tartwijk; Cees van der Vleuten; Sylvia Heeneman
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2018-03-24       Impact factor: 6.251

10.  Patterns of direct observation and their impact during residency: general practice supervisors' views.

Authors:  Chris B T Rietmeijer; Daniëlle Huisman; Annette H Blankenstein; Henk de Vries; Fedde Scheele; Anneke W M Kramer; Pim W Teunissen
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 6.251

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.