| Literature DB >> 34286127 |
D T Abeysinghe1, K A H Kumara1, K A D Kaushalya1, U G Chandrika2, D D D H Alwis1.
Abstract
The use of plant materials in traditional medicine as a significant ingredient in synthesizing drugs in the form of decoctions had played a vital role due to their potential therapeutic action. The curry leaves, Murraya koenigii, and Micromelum minutum are two most common aromatic herbs widespread in Sri Lanka and many other Asian countries. They are rich in nutrition and exert several medicinal properties such as antidiabetic, antioxidant, antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, and anti-carcinogenic due to various essential phytochemicals, minerals, and trace minerals. In this study, we determined the proximate composition, in vitro antioxidant activity, total phenol (TPC), flavonoid content (TFC), and antibacterial activity in both species using standard methods. Results showed that both species varied greatly in nutritional composition, antioxidant, and antibacterial activities. The nutrient composition in terms of ash, crude protein, and fat was significantly high in M. koenigii based on dry weight basis. In vitro antioxidant potential of M. koenigii and M. minutum was evaluated by means of the DPPH radical scavenging assay, and the IC50 values of M. koenigii and M. minutum were 107 ± 2 μg/mL and 208 ± 4 μg/mL, respectively. The TPC and TFC of M. koenigii were 101 ± 1 mg GAE/g and 9.75 ± 0.05 mg QE/g, and M. minutum were 80 ± 2 mg GAE/g and 9.16 ± 0.02 mg QE/g respectively. The antibacterial study was assessed against three bacterial strains. The study showed the highest inhibitory activity for M. koenigii and M. minutum against Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli, respectively at 1.0 mg/mL concentration. The study indicated that M. koenigii possessed a significantly high TPC, and TFC correlated with higher antibacterial and antioxidant activity than M. minutum.Entities:
Keywords: Antibacterial activity; Flavonoid content; IC50; In vitro antioxidant activity; Micromelum minutum; Murraya koenigii; Proximate composition; Total phenol content
Year: 2021 PMID: 34286127 PMCID: PMC8273414 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07449
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
Nutritional composition of M. koenigii and M. minutum leaves.
| Moisture content (g/100 g) | Ash content (g/100 g) | Protein content (g/100 g) | Fat content (g/100 g) | Carbohydrate content (g/100 g) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 69.4 ± 0.7a | 2.75 ± 0.05a | 15.6 ± 0.4a | 11 ± 3a | 2.3 ± 0.4a | |
| 70.4 ± 0.8a | 2.0 ± 0.1b | 14 ± 1b | 2.3 ± 0.6b | 11 ± 1b |
All data are presented as mean ± SD of the three replicates. Mean followed by a different letter in the same column differs significantly (p ≤ 0.05).
Phytochemical screening of M. koenigii and M. minutum.
| Phytochemical | ||
|---|---|---|
| Alkaloids | + | + |
| Flavonoids | + | + |
| Unsaturated steroids | + | + |
| Triterpenes | + | + |
| Saponins | - | - |
| Tannins | + | + |
Determination of total polyphenol content (TPC) and total flavonoid content (TFC) of M. koenigii and M. minutum leaf extracts.
| Species | TPC mg GAE/g of extract | TFC mg QE/g of extract |
|---|---|---|
| 101 ± 1a | 9.75 ± 0.05a | |
| 80 ± 2b | 9.16 ± 0.02b |
All the data is presented as mean ± SD of the three replicates. Mean followed by a different letter in the same column differs significantly (p ≤ 0.05).
Figure 1DPPH scavenging activity of curry leaves and Trolox standard. (O = Trolox standard, = M. koenigii, X = M. minutum).
Determination of the antioxidant activity of M. koenigii and M. minutum leaf extracts by DPPH free radical scavenging assay.
| Species | IC50 ± SD (μg/mL) |
|---|---|
| 107 ± 2a | |
| 208 ± 4b | |
| Trolox standard | 11.5 ± 0.4c |
All the data is presented as mean ± SD of the three replicates. Mean followed by a different letter in the same column differs significantly (p ≤ 0.05).
Zone of inhibition affected by M. koenigii and M. minutum plant leaf extracts using the Disc Diffusion method.
| Plant species/Standard | Concentration mg/μL | Zone of inhibition (DIZ)/(mm) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SA | PA | EC | ||
| 0.2 | 7.4 ± 0.2a | 5.7 ± 0.2b | 5.8 ± 0.2b | |
| 0.6 | 9.7 ± 0.4a | 5.9 ± 0.2b | 6.0 ± 0.0b | |
| 1.0 | 11.9 ± 0.3a | 7.1 ± 0.3b | 6.2 ± 0.2c | |
| 0.2 | 6.1 ± 0.3a | 5.9 ± 0.2a | 5.8 ± 0.3a | |
| 0.6 | 6.6 ± 0.3a | 5.9 ± 0.2b | 6.4 ± 0.2a’b | |
| 1.0 | 6.8 ± 0.3a | 6.0 ± 0.0b | 7.7 ± 0.3c | |
| Ciprofloxacin (μg/mL) | 100 | 18.0 ± 0.2a | 27.0 ± 0.0b | 29.1 ± 0.3c |
SA – S. aureus, PA – P. aeruginosa, EC – E. coli, DIZ – Diameter of Inhibitory Zone.
All the data is presented as mean ± SD of the three replicates. Mean followed by a different letter in the same row differs significantly (p ≤ 0.05).
Figure 2Agar plates for Murraya koenigii (MK) and Micromelum minutum (MM), SA – S. aureus, PA – P. aeruginosa, EC – E. coli. (A-1.0 mg/μL, B- 0.6 mg/μL, C- 0.2 mg/μL, D-negative control (DMSO) S - Ciprofloxacin.
Antibiotic susceptibility pattern of bacteria species.
| Extract/Antibiotic | Concentration (μg/mL) | DIZ (mm) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SA | PA | EC | ||
| Ciprofloxacin | 100 | 18.0 ± 0.2a | 27.0 ± 0.0b | 29.1 ± 0.3c |
| 1000 | 11.9 ± 0.3a | 7.1 ± 0.3b | 6.2 ± 0.2c | |
| 1000 | 6.8 ± 0.3a | 6.0 ± 0.0b | 7.7 ± 0.3c | |
SA – S. aureus, PA – P. aeruginosa, EC – E. coli, DIZ – Diameter of Inhibitory Zone.
All the data is presented as mean ± SD of the three replicates. Mean followed by a different letter in the same row differs significantly (p ≤ 0.05).