| Literature DB >> 34285785 |
Yunxia Zhao1, Minlin Wan1, Huisong Liu2, Mei Ma1.
Abstract
After rapid development and reform, the health level and medical diagnosis and treatment capabilities of Chinese residents have been significantly improved, and high-quality medical resources have significantly improved the life safety and health of the masses. As the most concentrated area of medical equipment in the hospital, the intensive care unit produces the most alarms during the operation of the equipment. The intensive care unit nurses are responsible for heavier nursing work, and the problem of alarming in other departments is more prominent. Therefore, this paper presents an analysis and research on the current situation and influencing factors of the alarm fatigue of nurse medical equipment in the intensive care unit based on intelligent medicine. This article uses a variety of related methods such as literature data method and questionnaire survey method to deeply study the theoretical knowledge of intelligent medical treatment, medical equipment alarm fatigue device, and so on. The logistic regression analysis method is introduced to classify its influencing factors, and the analysis experiment on the influencing factors of the medical equipment alarm fatigue of nurses in the intensive care unit is designed. The nurses' cognition of clinical alarms and the analysis of clinical alarm fatigue questionnaire data are studied. The alarm fatigue of nurses in the intensive care unit is at a severe level, which needs to be taken seriously in the intensive care unit. Unmarried, high-level positions, long working years, high professional titles, and high education are negatively correlated with alarm fatigue (P < 0.05), and those without an alarm habit are positively correlated with alarm fatigue (P < 0.05), and the number of night shifts per month is related to alarm fatigue. There is no correlation between them (P > 0.05).Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34285785 PMCID: PMC8275382 DOI: 10.1155/2021/9994303
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Healthc Eng ISSN: 2040-2295 Impact factor: 2.682
Figure 1Intensive care unit of a hospital.
Multifactor analysis of nurses' cognition of alarms with different characteristics.
| Project | Alarm sound | Nuisance alarm | Missing the alarm | Clinical policies | Newer monitoring systems | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Male | 3.93 | 4.13 | 3.68 | 3.76 | 4.42 |
| Female | 4.12 | 3.97 | 3.75 | 3.95 | 4.13 | |
|
| ||||||
|
| Married | 4.01 | 3.98 | 4.03 | 4.11 | 3.58 |
| Unmarried | 4.03 | 4.12 | 3.99 | 3.92 | 4.09 | |
|
| ||||||
|
| Junior college | 4.23 | 3.74 | 3.98 | 4.02 | 3.69 |
| Undergraduate | 4.11 | 4.12 | 4.45 | 3.94 | 3.26 | |
| Master degree | 3.72 | 4.11 | 3.97 | 3.85 | 3.33 | |
|
| ||||||
|
| Nurse | 4.04 | 4.15 | 3.42 | 3.95 | 4.53 |
| Group leader | 3.91 | 4.09 | 4.14 | 4.01 | 4.56 | |
| Head nurse | 3.45 | 3.95 | 3.76 | 3.58 | 4.28 | |
|
| ||||||
|
| 1-2 | 4.00 | 4.05 | 3.15 | 4.08 | 3.59 |
| 3–6 | 4.13 | 4.56 | 3.92 | 3.96 | 3.68 | |
| 7–11 | 3.96 | 3.78 | 4.01 | 3.75 | 3.79 | |
| ≥12 | 4.22 | 4.23 | 3.89 | 4.05 | 4.05 | |
|
| ||||||
|
| Yes | 3.57 | 3.59 | 4.12 | 4.08 | 4.19 |
| No | 4.12 | 4.28 | 4.13 | 3.85 | 4.23 | |
Figure 2Multifactor analysis of nurses' cognition of alarms with different characteristics.
Analysis of multi-factor index of alarm cognition.
| Project |
|
|
| CR | AVE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alarm sound | 15.68 | 3.24 | 3.32 | 0.853 | 0.666 |
| Nuisance alarm interferes with patient care | 13.49 | 3.58 | 2.21 | 0.946 | 0.846 |
| The condition of not hearing the alarm and missing the alarm | 16.22 | 2.69 | 2.25 | 0.878 | 0.716 |
| The institution has established effective clinical policies and regulations on alarm management | 9.58 | 4.56 | 3.24 | 0.886 | 0.669 |
| Newer monitoring systems can solve most of the old problems | 12.24 | 4.55 | 3.33 | 0.895 | 0.764 |
Figure 3Analysis of multifactor index of alarm cognition.
Perception scale and path coefficient analysis.
| Scale information | Original sample | Sample mean | Standard deviation |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Information quality | −0.451 | −0.452 | 0.066 | 6.695 | ≤0.001 |
| Perceived usefulness | 0.415 | 0.418 | 0.087 | 4.692 | ≤0.001 |
| Perceived risk | 0.057 | 0.054 | 0.081 | 0.675 | 0.501 |
| Willingness to use | −0.163 | −0.163 | 0.632 | 2.596 | 0.010 |
Figure 4Perception scale and path coefficient analysis.
Score of alarm fatigue scale and alarm management disorder score of nurses in intensive care unit.
| Entry | Score | Scoring rate (%) |
|---|---|---|
| The instrument alarm made me feel anxious A1 | 3.02 | 60.21 |
| The instrument alarm makes it difficult for me to concentrate A2 | 2.98 | 59.62 |
| The instrument alarm made me feel terrible A3 | 2.87 | 57.32 |
| The instrument alarm makes it easy for me to forget what I had to do A4 | 2.66 | 53.62 |
| The instrument alarm gives me a headache A5 | 2.53 | 50.41 |
| The instrument alarm made me feel powerless A6 | 2.48 | 49.42 |
| The instrument alarm makes me tired of everything A7 | 2.35 | 47.23 |
| Total score A8 | 18.88 | 53.95 |
| Frequent false alarms reduce nurses' attention and response to alarms B1 | 3.57 | 42.58 |
| Difficult to understand the priority of alarms B2 | 3.98 | 51.36 |
| It is difficult to hear the alarm when an alarm occurs B3 | 4.73 | 54.29 |
| Insufficient number of staff responding to the alarm B4 | 4.78 | 57.83 |
| Difficult to identify the source of the alarm B5 | 5.01 | 55.34 |
| Difficulties in setting the alarm correctly B6 | 5.02 | 56.22 |
| Overreliance on the alarm to draw attention to patient problems B7 | 5.41 | 59.87 |
| Noise competition from nonclinical alarms and pages B8 | 5.98 | 53.91 |
Figure 5Score of alarm fatigue scale and alarm management disorder score of nurses in intensive care unit.
Figure 6Multiple stepwise regression analysis of influencing factors of alarm fatigue of nurses in intensive care unit.
Multiple stepwise regression analysis of influencing factors of alarm fatigue of nurses in intensive care unit.
| Variable |
| SE |
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constant | 6.533 | 2.936 | — | 19.257 | <0.001 |
| Marital status | −1.635 | 0.792 | −0.881 | −2.068 | 0.051 |
| Job title | −8.384 | 0.758 | −0.429 | −10.782 | <0.001 |
| Working years | −3.435 | 0.524 | −0.336 | −6.654 | <0.001 |
| Job title | −3.233 | 0.587 | −0.235 | −5.158 | <0.001 |
| Do you have a habit of setting up medical equipment alarms? | 4.865 | 0.936 | 0.191 | 5.256 | <0.001 |
| Education | −5.231 | 1.289 | −0.158 | −4.087 | <0.001 |
| Number of night shifts per month | <0.001 | 0.387 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 1.000 |
The characteristic value of each factor and the percentage explaining the total variation.
| Factor | Eigenvalues | The total variation | Accumulation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Positive attitude to the police, C1 | 3.943 | 15.766 | 15.766 |
| Alarm positive behavior, C2 | 2.922 | 11.651 | 27.427 |
| Alarm negative behavior, C3 | 2.419 | 9.647 | 37.055 |
| Basic knowledge of ECG monitor alarm status, C4 | 1.765 | 7.055 | 44.118 |
| Alarm fatigue reason, C5 | 1.448 | 5.756 | 49.862 |
| Basic knowledge of ventilator alarm status, C6 | 1.223 | 4.852 | 54.724 |
| Alarm parameters, C7 | 1.156 | 4.601 | 59.325 |
Figure 7The characteristic value of each factor and the percentage explaining the total variation.
The influence of ICU working years and occupational satisfaction on the overall score of alarm response fatigue.
| Project | Knowledge standard score | Belief standard score | Behavior standard score |
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| <5 | 59.58 | 74.48 | 76.23 | 15.129 | <0.001 |
| 5–10 | 62.01 | 76.37 | 75.27 | 2.284 | 0.114 | |
| >11 | 85.15 | 79.74 | 85.23 | 8.031 | <0.001 | |
|
| ||||||
|
| Satisfaction | 63.58 | 80.77 | 82.23 | 0.161 | 0.853 |
| General | 62.73 | 74.41 | 75.72 | 7.622 | 0.001 | |
| Dissatisfied | 32.01 | 71.63 | 71.53 | 9.871 | <0.001 | |
Figure 8The influence of ICU working years and occupational satisfaction on the overall score of alarm response fatigue.