| Literature DB >> 34285303 |
Alice C Copsey1, Mario R O Barsottini1, Benjamin May1,2, Fei Xu1,3, Mary S Albury1, Luke Young1, Anthony L Moore4.
Abstract
Candidemia caused by Candida spp. is a serious threat in hospital settings being a major cause of acquired infection and death and a possible contributor to Covid-19 mortality. Candidemia incidence has been rising worldwide following increases in fungicide-resistant pathogens highlighting the need for more effective antifungal agents with novel modes of action. The membrane-bound enzyme alternative oxidase (AOX) promotes fungicide resistance and is absent in humans making it a desirable therapeutic target. However, the lipophilic nature of the AOX substrate (ubiquinol-10) has hindered its kinetic characterisation in physiologically-relevant conditions. Here, we present the purification and expression of recombinant AOXs from C. albicans and C. auris in a self-assembled proteoliposome (PL) system. Kinetic parameters (Km and Vmax) with respect to ubiquinol-10 have been determined. The PL system has also been employed in dose-response assays with novel AOX inhibitors. Such information is critical for the future development of novel treatments for Candidemia.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34285303 PMCID: PMC8292455 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-94320-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1A proteolipisome system for the measurement of AOX kinetics. (A) PLs suitable for kinetic studies were prepared by inserting Ubiquinone-10 (Q10) and bacterially-expressed AOX proteins into phospholipid vesicles[26]. After PL preparation, NDH-2 was added externally to bind to the membrane of the PLs for oxidation of the electron donor NADH and subsequently Q10. Drawn with Microsoft Powerpoint 2016. (B) AOX and NDH-2 proteins were purified to homogeneity from bacterial membranes. Samples of total protein (1), insoluble (2) and soluble membrane fractions (3) and purified protein (4) were resolved by SDS-PAGE and visualised using immunoblotting (1–4) or coomassie blue staining; NDH-2 (5) TAO (6), C. albicans (7), C. auris (8). (C) Specific activity of membrane-bound AOX was detrmined by measurement of oxygen uptake in a Oroboros Q2k oxygraph. Specific activity of the purified AOX proteins was determined by monitoring the change of absorbance at A278nm on oxidation of 100 nmol Q1H2 by the oxidase and expressed as µmol. Q1H2 min−1 mg−1. The specific activity of NDH-2 was determined by monitoring the change of absorbance at A340nm on oxidation of 1 mM NADH and expressed as µmol. NADH oxidised min−1 mg−1. Note that zero activity for C. albicans and C. auris AOX was detectable (ND). Original gels and blots are shown in Supplementary Fig. 4.
Figure 2Kinetic characterization of AOX proteins incorporated into proteoliposomes with respect to ubiquinol-10 (Q10H2). (A) The rates of Q10H2 oxidation by bacterially-expressed AOX were calculated at increasing NDH-2 concentrations. The reaction was monitored spectrophotometrically by the oxidation of NADH by NDH-2 at A340 nm. Each bar shows the mean value of technical duplicates (diamonds). The point at which TAO AOX becomes rate limiting was determined and this concentration of NDH-2 protein was added to subsequent kinetic assays. (B) Concomitant measurements of oxygen consumption and redox poise of the Q pool in the PL system. PL prepared as described in the Methods section. The traces represent the O2 concentration (dot-dashed blue line) the O2 consumption rate (continuous red line with values in nmol O2 min−1 shown) and the redox poise of the Q pool (dashed black line). Serial additions of NADH, NDH-2, TAO and AF are indicated on top. (C–E) Q10 Michaelis–Menten curve for AOXs. The assay was performed in 200 µL 65 mM MOPS pH 7.5 with a starting concentration of 300 µM NADH. Each point (black dot) represents the mean value of individual PL preparations for which a different amount of Q10 was added. Technical replicates are shown as gray diamonds. The rates of reaction were plotted against the Q10 concentration in the membranes and fit to the Michaelis–Menten equation. Protein and Q10 quantifications were performed as described in the Methods section. (F) Summary of kinetic parameters determined for each AOX shown in panels C–E (mean ± SD).
Figure 3Inhibitor dose response assays for AOX incorporated into proteoliposomes. (A–D) Dose–response assay with AF, CB, CD and SHAM against AOX proteins. The assay was performed in 200 µL 65 mM MOPS pH 7.5 with a starting concentration of 300 µM NADH. Points represent the mean value (darker shading) and individual replicates (lighter shading) of technical measurements and the continuous line is the best fit for a four-parameter sigmoid function. (E) IC50 values determined from the data presented in Panels A–D. All measurements are the average of 3 biological replications ± SD. For each inhibitor, C. albicans and C. auris IC50 values which are significantly different from TAO (i.e., within columns) are marked with asterisks (* p < 0.002 and ** p < 0.001). C. albicans and C. auris differ significantly from each other only for AF (p = 0.013).