Literature DB >> 3428308

Bioavailability of L-dopa after Madopar HBS administration in healthy volunteers.

C Crevoisier1, B Hoevels, G Zürcher, M Da Prada.   

Abstract

Eight healthy male and fasted volunteers received alternatively either one HBS capsule of Madopar 125 or two HBS capsules of Madopar 125 or one standard capsule of Madopar 125 at weekly intervals with and without benserazide pretreatment (50 mg t.i.d. for 6 days). In this trial the Madopar formulations were administered 9.5 h after the last dose of benserazide. Serial blood samples were collected at various time intervals up to 12 h after Madopar dosing. Levodopa plasma concentrations were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection. After Madopar HBS without benserazide pretreatment the peak concentration (Cmax) of levodopa was lower and occurred at later times (tmax) than after standard Madopar. The mean values for tmax were 2.4, 2.8 and 0.8 h, whereas those for Cmax were 0.25, 0.56 and 1.38 micrograms/ml for one HBS capsule, two HBS capsules and standard Madopar, respectively. The mean relative bioavailability (versus standard Madopar) was 58 and 67% (value normalized to dose) for one and two HBS capsules, respectively. The parameter of half-value duration (= time span where plasma concentrations are equal to or higher than the half Cmax) was on average 3.5, 3.8 and 0.8 h for one HBS capsule, two HBS capsules and standard Madopar, respectively. Following benserazide pretreatment the mean tmax values for levodopa were 2.8, 2.3 and 0.8 h and the mean Cmax values were 0.35, 0.60 and 1.33 micrograms/ml, respectively, for one HBS capsule, two HBS capsules and standard Madopar. The relative bioavailability (versus standard Madopar) was 57 +/- 14 and 63 +/- 21% (value normalized to dose) for one and two HBS capsules, respectively. The mean values of the half-value duration were 3.6, 4.2 and 1.3 h for one HBS capsule, two HBS capsules and standard Madopar, respectively. For most of the parameters measured, the interindividual variability after Madopar HBS was less pronounced than after standard Madopar. In conclusion, according to these kinetic data, Madopar HBS shows the characteristics of a controlled-release formulation. The reduced bioavailability of the HBS form (60% of that of the standard form) suggests that a higher daily dose of Madopar HBS should be used for clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3428308     DOI: 10.1159/000116173

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Neurol        ISSN: 0014-3022            Impact factor:   1.710


  13 in total

Review 1.  Floating drug delivery systems: a review.

Authors:  Shweta Arora; Javed Ali; Alka Ahuja; Roop K Khar; Sanjula Baboota
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2005-10-19       Impact factor: 3.246

2.  Sustained-release of levodopa: single dose study of a new formulation.

Authors:  M Gerlach; W Kuhn; T Müller; P Klotz; H Przuntek
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.575

3.  Pharmacological mechanisms of interhemispheric signal propagation: a TMS-EEG study.

Authors:  Jeanette Hui; Reza Zomorrodi; Pantelis Lioumis; Bahar Salavati; Tarek K Rajji; Robert Chen; Daniel M Blumberger; Zafiris J Daskalakis
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 7.853

4.  Levodopa administration modulates striatal processing of punishment-associated items in healthy participants.

Authors:  Bianca C Wittmann; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2014-06-13       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Madopar HBS and the decompensated phase of Parkinson disease.

Authors:  T Caraceni; N Nordera; E Lamperti; A Lorizio
Journal:  Ital J Neurol Sci       Date:  1989-08

6.  A comparison of the effects of controlled-release levodopa (Madopar CR) with conventional levodopa in late Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  D G MacMahon; D Sachdev; H G Boddie; C J Ellis; B R Kendal; N A Blackburn
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 10.154

7.  Auditory mismatch responses are differentially sensitive to changes in muscarinic acetylcholine versus dopamine receptor function.

Authors:  Lilian Aline Weber; Sara Tomiello; Dario Schöbi; Katharina V Wellstein; Daniel Mueller; Sandra Iglesias; Klaas Enno Stephan
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 8.713

8.  Defining small differences in efficacy between anti-parkinsonian agents using gait analysis: a comparison of two controlled release formulations of levodopa/decarboxylase inhibitor.

Authors:  C Weller; C J O'Neill; A Charlett; S G Bowes; A Purkiss; P W Nicholson; R J Dobbs; S M Dobbs
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 9.  Pharmacokinetic optimisation in the treatment of Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  M Contin; R Riva; F Albani; A Baruzzi
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 6.447

10.  Assaying the effect of levodopa on the evaluation of risk in healthy humans.

Authors:  Mkael Symmonds; Nicholas D Wright; Elizabeth Fagan; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.