Literature DB >> 24923987

Levodopa administration modulates striatal processing of punishment-associated items in healthy participants.

Bianca C Wittmann1, Mark D'Esposito.   

Abstract

RATIONALE: Appetitive and aversive processes share a number of features such as their relevance for action and learning. On a neural level, reward and its predictors are associated with increased firing of dopaminergic neurons, whereas punishment processing has been linked to the serotonergic system and to decreases in dopamine transmission. Recent data indicate, however, that the dopaminergic system also responds to aversive stimuli and associated actions.
OBJECTIVES: In this pharmacological functional magnetic resonance imaging study, we investigated the contribution of the dopaminergic system to reward and punishment processing in humans.
METHODS: Two groups of participants received either placebo or the dopamine precursor levodopa and were scanned during alternating reward and punishment anticipation blocks.
RESULTS: Levodopa administration increased striatal activations for cues presented in punishment blocks. In an interaction with individual personality scores, levodopa also enhanced striatal activation for punishment-predictive compared with neutral cues in participants scoring higher on the novelty-seeking dimension.
CONCLUSIONS: These data support recent indications that dopamine contributes to punishment processing and suggest that the novelty-seeking trait is a measure of susceptibility to drug effects on motivation. These findings are also consistent with the possibility of an inverted U-shaped response function of dopamine in the striatum, suggesting an optimal level of dopamine release for motivational processing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24923987      PMCID: PMC4265314          DOI: 10.1007/s00213-014-3646-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  67 in total

1.  Cerebral correlates of salient prediction error for different rewards and punishments.

Authors:  Elise Metereau; Jean-Claude Dreher
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  L-dopa modulates functional connectivity in striatal cognitive and motor networks: a double-blind placebo-controlled study.

Authors:  Clare Kelly; Greig de Zubicaray; Adriana Di Martino; David A Copland; Philip T Reiss; Donald F Klein; F Xavier Castellanos; Michael P Milham; Katie McMahon
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-06-03       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Enhanced behavioral response to repeated d-amphetamine and personality traits in humans.

Authors:  K W Sax; S M Strakowski
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  1998-12-01       Impact factor: 13.382

Review 4.  A neural substrate of prediction and reward.

Authors:  W Schultz; P Dayan; P R Montague
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-03-14       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Multilocus genetic composite reflecting dopamine signaling capacity predicts reward circuitry responsivity.

Authors:  Eric Stice; Sonja Yokum; Kyle Burger; Leonard Epstein; Andy Smolen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Pramipexole modulates the neural network of reward anticipation.

Authors:  Zheng Ye; Anke Hammer; Estela Camara; Thomas F Münte
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Magnetization transfer contrast (MTC) and tissue water proton relaxation in vivo.

Authors:  S D Wolff; R S Balaban
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  High impulsivity predicts the switch to compulsive cocaine-taking.

Authors:  David Belin; Adam C Mar; Jeffrey W Dalley; Trevor W Robbins; Barry J Everitt
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-06-06       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Impulsive personality predicts dopamine-dependent changes in frontostriatal activity during component processes of working memory.

Authors:  Roshan Cools; Margaret Sheridan; Emily Jacobs; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-05-16       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Dopamine agonist increases risk taking but blunts reward-related brain activity.

Authors:  Jordi Riba; Ulrike M Krämer; Marcus Heldmann; Sylvia Richter; Thomas F Münte
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  10 in total

1.  The effect of dopamine on conditioned placebo analgesia in healthy individuals: a double-blind randomized trial.

Authors:  Matthias Zunhammer; Magnus Gerardi; Ulrike Bingel
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Different brain systems support learning from received and avoided pain during human pain-avoidance learning.

Authors:  Marieke Jepma; Mathieu Roy; Kiran Ramlakhan; Monique van Velzen; Albert Dahan
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 8.713

3.  Stimulus Novelty Energizes Actions in the Absence of Explicit Reward.

Authors:  Raphael Koster; Tricia X Seow; Raymond J Dolan; Emrah Düzel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Neither Cholinergic Nor Dopaminergic Enhancement Improve Spatial Working Memory Precision in Humans.

Authors:  Adeola N Harewood Smith; Jnana Aditya Challa; Michael A Silver
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 3.492

5.  Altered monetary loss processing and reinforcement-based learning in individuals with obesity.

Authors:  Jana Kube; David Mathar; Annette Horstmann; Sonja A Kotz; Arno Villringer; Jane Neumann
Journal:  Brain Imaging Behav       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.978

6.  Dopamine, time perception, and future time perspective.

Authors:  Jennifer M Mitchell; Dawn Weinstein; Taylor Vega; Andrew S Kayser
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 7.  Using pharmacological manipulations to study the role of dopamine in human reward functioning: A review of studies in healthy adults.

Authors:  Heather E Webber; Paula Lopez-Gamundi; Sydney N Stamatovich; Harriet de Wit; Margaret C Wardle
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2020-11-14       Impact factor: 8.989

8.  No effect of a dopaminergic modulation fMRI task by amisulpride and L-DOPA on reward anticipation in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Oliver Grimm; Magdalena Nägele; Lea Küpper-Tetzel; Moritz de Greck; Michael Plichta; Andreas Reif
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Cardiac Concomitants of Feedback and Prediction Error Processing in Reinforcement Learning.

Authors:  Lucas Kastner; Jana Kube; Arno Villringer; Jane Neumann
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  Intrinsically regulated learning is modulated by synaptic dopamine signaling.

Authors:  Pablo Ripollés; Laura Ferreri; Marta Valle; Jordi Riba; Antoni Rodriguez-Fornells; Ernest Mas-Herrero; Helena Alicart; Alba Gómez-Andrés; Josep Marco-Pallares; Rosa Maria Antonijoan; Toemme Noesselt
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-08-30       Impact factor: 8.140

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.