Literature DB >> 34282214

Low pan-immune-inflammation-value predicts better chemotherapy response and survival in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Ahmet Bilgehan Şahin1, Erdem Cubukcu2, Birol Ocak2, Adem Deligonul2, Sibel Oyucu Orhan2, Sahsine Tolunay3, Mustafa Sehsuvar Gokgoz4, Sibel Cetintas5, Gorkem Yarbas6, Kazım Senol4, Mehmet Refik Goktug6, Zeki Burak Yanasma6, Ulviyya Hasanzade6, Turkkan Evrensel2.   

Abstract

Blood-based biomarkers reflect systemic inflammation status and have prognostic and predictive value in solid malignancies. As a recently defined biomarker, Pan-Immune-Inflammation-Value (PIV) integrates different peripheral blood cell subpopulations. This retrospective study of collected data aimed to assess whether PIV may predict the pathological complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in Turkish women with breast cancer. The study consisted of 743 patients with breast cancer who were scheduled to undergo NAC before attempting cytoreductive surgery. A pre-treatment complete blood count was obtained in the two weeks preceding NAC, and blood-based biomarkers were calculated from absolute counts of relevant cell populations. The pCR was defined as the absence of tumor cells in both the mastectomy specimen and lymph nodes. Secondary outcome measures included disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). One hundred seven patients (14.4%) had pCR. In receiver operating characteristic analysis, optimal cut-off values for the neutrophile-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte (PLR), PIV, and Ki-67 index were determined as ≥ 2.34, ≥ 0.22, ≥ 131.8, ≥ 306.4, and  ≥ 27, respectively. The clinical tumor (T) stage, NLR, MLR, PLR, PIV, estrogen receptor (ER) status, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER-2) status, and Ki-67 index were significantly associated with NAC response in univariate analyses. However, multivariate analysis revealed that the clinical T stage, PIV, ER status, HER-2 status, and Ki-67 index were independent predictors for pCR. Moreover, the low PIV group patients had significantly better DFS and OS than those in the high PIV group (p = 0.034, p = 0.028, respectively). Based on our results, pre-treatment PIV seems as a predictor for pCR and survival, outperforming NLR, MLR, PLR in predicting pCR in Turkish women with breast cancer who received NAC. However, further studies are needed to confirm our findings.
© 2021. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34282214     DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-94184-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  31 in total

Review 1.  Inflammation and cancer: What a surgical oncologist should know.

Authors:  Aurélien Dupré; Hassan Z Malik
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 4.424

Review 2.  Breast Cancer Epidemiology, Prevention, and Screening.

Authors:  Stella Winters; Charmaine Martin; Daniel Murphy; Navkiran K Shokar
Journal:  Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 3.622

Review 3.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: review of literature.

Authors:  Dinesh Chandra Doval; Kumardeep Dutta; Ullas Batra; Vineet Talwar
Journal:  J Indian Med Assoc       Date:  2013-09

Review 4.  Radiological and Pathological Predictors of Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer: A Brief Literature Review.

Authors:  Tejal Parekh; David Dodwell; Nisha Sharma; Abeer M Shaaban
Journal:  Pathobiology       Date:  2015-08-31       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 5.  The systemic inflammation-based neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio: experience in patients with cancer.

Authors:  Graeme J K Guthrie; Kellie A Charles; Campbell S D Roxburgh; Paul G Horgan; Donald C McMillan; Stephen J Clarke
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 6.312

Review 6.  Prognostic role of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in solid tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Arnoud J Templeton; Mairéad G McNamara; Boštjan Šeruga; Francisco E Vera-Badillo; Priya Aneja; Alberto Ocaña; Raya Leibowitz-Amit; Guru Sonpavde; Jennifer J Knox; Ben Tran; Ian F Tannock; Eitan Amir
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 7.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced breast cancer: a review of the literature and future directions.

Authors:  J Mathew; K S Asgeirsson; K L Cheung; S Chan; A Dahda; J F R Robertson
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2008-05-23       Impact factor: 4.424

Review 8.  Breast Cancer Epidemiology and Risk Factors.

Authors:  Kristin Rojas; Ashley Stuckey
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.190

9.  Pathologic Complete Response after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Impact on Breast Cancer Recurrence and Survival: A Comprehensive Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Laura M Spring; Geoffrey Fell; Andrea Arfe; Lorenzo Trippa; Aditya Bardia; Chandni Sharma; Rachel Greenup; Kerry L Reynolds; Barbara L Smith; Brian Alexander; Beverly Moy; Steven J Isakoff; Giovanni Parmigiani
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 10.  Monocyte heterogeneity and functions in cancer.

Authors:  Claire E Olingy; Huy Q Dinh; Catherine C Hedrick
Journal:  J Leukoc Biol       Date:  2019-02-18       Impact factor: 4.962

View more
  8 in total

1.  Metabolic Syndrome Predicts Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Ying Lu; Pinxiu Wang; Ning Lan; Fei Kong; Awaguli Abdumijit; Shiyan Tu; Yanting Li; Wenzhen Yuan
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 5.738

Review 2.  The Association between the Pan-Immune-Inflammation Value and Cancer Prognosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Deniz Can Guven; Taha Koray Sahin; Enes Erul; Saadettin Kilickap; Thilo Gambichler; Sercan Aksoy
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 6.575

3.  A Novel Inflammatory-Nutritional Prognostic Scoring System for Patients with Early-Stage Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Xin Hua; Fangfang Duan; Wenyu Zhai; Chenge Song; Chang Jiang; Li Wang; Jiajia Huang; Huanxin Lin; Zhongyu Yuan
Journal:  J Inflamm Res       Date:  2022-01-16

4.  Pan-Immune-Inflammation Value: A New Prognostic Index in Operative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Fei Lin; Li-Ping Zhang; Shuang-Yan Xie; Han-Ying Huang; Xiao-Yu Chen; Tong-Chao Jiang; Ling Guo; Huan-Xin Lin
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 5.738

5.  A Novel Combined Nomogram Model for Predicting the Pathological Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Invasive Breast Carcinoma of No Specific Type: Real-World Study.

Authors:  Xuelin Zhu; Jing Shen; Huanlei Zhang; Xiulin Wang; Huihui Zhang; Jing Yu; Qing Zhang; Dongdong Song; Liping Guo; Dianlong Zhang; Ruiping Zhu; Jianlin Wu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 5.738

Review 6.  Predictive Biomarkers of Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer: Current and Future Perspectives for Precision Medicine.

Authors:  Françoise Derouane; Cédric van Marcke; Martine Berlière; Amandine Gerday; Latifa Fellah; Isabelle Leconte; Mieke R Van Bockstal; Christine Galant; Cyril Corbet; Francois P Duhoux
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-11       Impact factor: 6.575

7.  Low Pre-ChemoradiotherapyPan-Immune-Inflammation Value (PIV) Measures Predict Better Survival Outcomes in Locally Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinomas.

Authors:  Erkan Topkan; Ugur Selek; Ahmet Kucuk; Berrin Pehlivan
Journal:  J Inflamm Res       Date:  2022-09-18

8.  Pan-immune-inflammation value independently predicts disease recurrence in patients with Merkel cell carcinoma.

Authors:  T Gambichler; S Said; N Abu Rached; C H Scheel; L Susok; R Stranzenbach; J C Becker
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 4.322

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.