Literature DB >> 24848464

Painful cutaneous laser stimuli induce event-related oscillatory EEG activities that are different from those induced by nonpainful electrical stimuli.

J H Chien1, C C Liu1, J H Kim2, T M Markman1, F A Lenz3.   

Abstract

The non-phase-locked EEG response to painful stimuli has usually been characterized as decreased oscillatory activity (event-related desynchronization, ERD) in the alpha band. Increased activity (event-related synchronization, ERS) in the gamma band has been reported more recently. We have now tested the hypothesis that the non-phase-locked responses to nonpainful electric cutaneous stimuli are different from those to painful cutaneous laser stimuli when the baseline salience of the two stimuli is the same and the salience during the protocol is modulated by count laser and count electric tasks. Both of these stimuli were presented in random order in a single train at intensities that produced the same baseline salience in the same somatic location. The response to the laser stimulus was characterized by five windows (designated windows I-V) in the time-frequency domain: early (200-400 ms) and late (600-1,400 ms) delta/theta ERS, 500-900 ms alpha ERD, 1,200-1,600 ms beta ERS (rebound), and 800-1,200 ms gamma ERS. Similar ERS/ERD windows of activity were found for the electric stimulus. Individual participants very commonly had activity in windows consistent with the overall analysis. Linear regression of ERS/ERD for parietal channels was most commonly found for sensory (pain or unpleasantness)- or attention (salience)-related measures. Overall, the main effect for modality was found in window I-delta/theta and window V-gamma, and the Modality with Task interaction was found in all five windows. All significant interaction terms included Modality as a factor. Therefore, Modality was the most common factor explaining our results, which is consistent with our hypothesis.
Copyright © 2014 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EEG; attention; cortex; event-related synchronization; human; pain

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24848464      PMCID: PMC4122748          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00209.2014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  53 in total

1.  Oscillatory gamma activity in humans and its role in object representation.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Event-related desynchronization: the effects of energetic and computational demands.

Authors:  F Boiten; J Sergeant; R Geuze
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1992-04

3.  Attention to a painful cutaneous laser stimulus modulates electrocorticographic event-related desynchronization in humans.

Authors:  S Ohara; N E Crone; N Weiss; F A Lenz
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.708

4.  Attention to painful stimulation enhances gamma-band activity and synchronization in human sensorimotor cortex.

Authors:  Michael Hauck; Jürgen Lorenz; Andreas K Engel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-08-29       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Nociceptive laser-evoked brain potentials do not reflect nociceptive-specific neural activity.

Authors:  A Mouraux; G D Iannetti
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 6.  Across-trial averaging of event-related EEG responses and beyond.

Authors:  A Mouraux; G D Iannetti
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-05-13       Impact factor: 2.546

7.  Post-movement synchronization of beta rhythms in the EEG over the cortical foot area in man.

Authors:  C Neuper; G Pfurtscheller
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1996-09-20       Impact factor: 3.046

8.  Imaging how attention modulates pain in humans using functional MRI.

Authors:  Susanna J Bantick; Richard G Wise; Alexander Ploghaus; Stuart Clare; Stephen M Smith; Irene Tracey
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 13.501

9.  Discrimination between phase-locked and non-phase-locked event-related EEG activity.

Authors:  J Kalcher; G Pfurtscheller
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1995-05

10.  Pain perception, hypnosis and 40 Hz oscillations.

Authors:  Rodney J Croft; John D Williams; Corinna Haenschel; John H Gruzelier
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.997

View more
  9 in total

1.  Functional role of induced gamma oscillatory responses in processing noxious and innocuous sensory events in humans.

Authors:  C C Liu; J H Chien; Y W Chang; J H Kim; W S Anderson; F A Lenz
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 3.590

2.  Oscillatory EEG activity induced by conditioning stimuli during fear conditioning reflects Salience and Valence of these stimuli more than Expectancy.

Authors:  J H Chien; L Colloca; A Korzeniewska; J J Cheng; C M Campbell; A E Hillis; F A Lenz
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2017-01-08       Impact factor: 3.590

3.  Cortical interaction of bilateral inputs is similar for noxious and innocuous stimuli but leads to different perceptual effects.

Authors:  Stéphane Northon; Zoha Deldar; Mathieu Piché
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Haptic exploration attenuates and alters somatosensory cortical oscillations.

Authors:  Max J Kurz; Alex I Wiesman; Nathan M Coolidge; Tony W Wilson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Induced oscillatory signaling in the beta frequency of top-down pain modulation.

Authors:  Martin Diers; Cecile C de Vos; Wiebke Gandhi; Marie E Hoeppli; Susanne Becker; Elisabeth Bock; Sylvain Baillet; Petra Schweinhardt
Journal:  Pain Rep       Date:  2020-01-17

6.  Commentary: Differential Cerebral Response to Somatosensory Stimulation of an Acupuncture Point vs. Two Non-Acupuncture Points Measured with EEG and fMRI.

Authors:  Yiu Ming Wong
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 7.  Behavioral, Physiological and EEG Activities Associated with Conditioned Fear as Sensors for Fear and Anxiety.

Authors:  Jui-Hong Chien; Luana Colloca; Anna Korzeniewska; Timothy J Meeker; O Joe Bienvenu; Mark I Saffer; Fred A Lenz
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 3.576

8.  Neuronal Oscillations in Various Frequency Bands Differ between Pain and Touch.

Authors:  Georgios Michail; Christian Dresel; Viktor Witkovský; Anne Stankewitz; Enrico Schulz
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Vigilance behaviors and EEG activity in sustained attention may affect acute pain.

Authors:  J H Chien; A Korzeniewska; A E Hillis; J H Kim; N Emerson; J D Greenspan; C M Campbell; T J Meeker; T M Markman; F A Lenz
Journal:  J Syst Integr Neurosci       Date:  2017-12-02
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.