Literature DB >> 34278544

Implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery program with robotic surgery in high-risk patients obtains optimal results after colorectal resections.

Lidia Cristóbal Poch1, Carmen Cagigas Fernández2, Marcos Gómez-Ruiz2,3, Marta Ortega Roldán4, Ramón Cantero Cid5, Julio Castillo Diego2, Manuel Gómez-Fleitas6.   

Abstract

Enhanced recovery after surgery programs reduce postoperative complications and length of stay after laparoscopic colorectal surgery, but are still under evaluation after robotic colorectal surgery. To evaluate potential benefits in terms of length of stay and complications of an Enhanced recovery after surgery program in colorectal surgery. A subanalysis was performed to assess what combination of surgical approach and perioperative care had better outcomes. Prospective observational cohort study. 300 consecutive colorectal surgery patients: 150 were prospectively included in the enhanced recovery after Surgery program group and 150 retrospectively in the traditional care group, and subdivided according to the type of surgery, in Hospital Marques de Valdecilla, between 2013 and 2016. Postoperative complications decreased significantly (p = 0.002) from 46 to 28% (traditional care vs program group). The length of stay was decreased by 2 days (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis indicated similar effect sizes after adjusting for age, gender, Charlson score, and type of surgery. Type of surgery was an independent predictive factor for postoperative complications and length of stay. Compared to open surgery, postoperative complications decreased by 50% (p < 0.001) after robotic surgery and by 40% (p = 0.01) after laparoscopic surgery, while the median length of stay decreased by three days (p < 0.001) after minimally invasive surgery. Enhanced recovery after surgery program and minimally invasive surgery were associated with decreased morbidity and length of stay after colorectal surgery compared to open surgery and traditional care. An enhanced recovery after surgery program with robotic surgery in high-risk patients might be beneficial.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colorectal surgery; Enhanced recovery after surgery; Laparoscopic; Robotic surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34278544     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-021-01281-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  35 in total

1.  Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes after laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  N S Abraham; J M Young; M J Solomon
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Fast-track surgery: the next revolution in surgical care following laparoscopy.

Authors:  Karem Slim
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.788

3.  Short-term quality-of-life outcomes following laparoscopic-assisted colectomy vs open colectomy for colon cancer: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Jane C Weeks; Heidi Nelson; Shari Gelber; Daniel Sargent; Georgene Schroeder
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-01-16       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  COLOR: a randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open resection for colon cancer.

Authors:  E J Hazebroek
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-03-18       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Laparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: prospective randomised trial.

Authors:  Ka Lau Leung; Samuel P Y Kwok; Steve C W Lam; Janet F Y Lee; Raymond Y C Yiu; Simon S M Ng; Paul B S Lai; Wan Yee Lau
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004-04-10       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial.

Authors:  Antonio M Lacy; Juan C García-Valdecasas; Salvadora Delgado; Antoni Castells; Pilar Taurá; Josep M Piqué; Josep Visa
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-06-29       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial.

Authors:  James Fleshman; Daniel J Sargent; Erin Green; Mehran Anvari; Steven J Stryker; Robert W Beart; Michael Hellinger; Richard Flanagan; Walter Peters; Heidi Nelson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  COLOR II. A randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery for rectal cancer.

Authors:  M Buunen; H J Bonjer; W C J Hop; E Haglind; G Kurlberg; J Rosenberg; A M Lacy; M A Cuesta; A D'Hoore; A Fürst; J F Lange; P Jess; O Bulut; P Poornoroozy; K Juul Jensen; M Mark Christensen; E Lundhus; H Ovesen; D Birch; I Iesalnieks; C Jäger; M Kreis; Y van riet; E van der Harst; M F Gerhards; W A Bemelman; B M E Hansson; P A Neijenhuis; H A Prins; C Balague; E Targarona; J A Luján Mompeán; J D Franco Osorio; F J Garcia Molina; S Skullman; Z Läckberg; U Kressner; P Matthiessen; S H Kim; A Alfredo Poza
Journal:  Dan Med Bull       Date:  2009-05

9.  Effect of Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection vs Open Resection of Stage II or III Rectal Cancer on Pathologic Outcomes: The ACOSOG Z6051 Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  James Fleshman; Megan Branda; Daniel J Sargent; Anne Marie Boller; Virgilio George; Maher Abbas; Walter R Peters; Dipen Maun; George Chang; Alan Herline; Alessandro Fichera; Matthew Mutch; Steven Wexner; Mark Whiteford; John Marks; Elisa Birnbaum; David Margolin; David Larson; Peter Marcello; Mitchell Posner; Thomas Read; John Monson; Sherry M Wren; Peter W T Pisters; Heidi Nelson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group.

Authors:  David G Jayne; Pierre J Guillou; Helen Thorpe; Philip Quirke; Joanne Copeland; Adrian M H Smith; Richard M Heath; Julia M Brown
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-07-20       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  1 in total

1.  Implementation of multi-mode nursing insulation program for patients receiving surgery for spine tumor: a propensity score-matched analysis.

Authors:  Juan Liu; Chunyan Gao; Hailong Fu; Xiaonan Zhou; Li Zhang; Xiaomei Tang; Yanru Wu; Hui Zhu; Sisi Yang; Yafeng Qu; Yajuan Yang; Haiqin Yang
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2022-01-08       Impact factor: 2.102

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.